User talk:FunkyFly

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

/Archive1 /Archive2 /Archive3 /Archive4 /Archive5 /Archive6

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36]

Cuisine[edit]

It has no Bulgarian influences, until you prove otherwise with references. Respect other people's hard work. --Bonina 22:59, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but do you have a source to prove it does not? You are the one claiming it.   /FunkyFly.talk_  23:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, if something is not referenced it should be omitted. Your logic is non existent. Sure they are similar, but both Macedonian and Bulgarian cuisines were influenced by others. Not by each other. --Bonina 23:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No really. There are no sources for any influences, it does not mean that they should be omitted. You claim something - present a source, otherwise the consensus version is restored.   /FunkyFly.talk_  23:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lookup consensus. It's not a consensus because I do not consent. Now, all of a sudden I want Macedonian cuisine to be influenced by Japanese, Yemenite, and Sudanese cuisine. Wanna go with that? --Bonina 23:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The world does not revolve around you.   /FunkyFly.talk_  23:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Bonina, I don't understand why you find saying that FYROM's cookery programs have been influenced by their counterparts in Bulgaria so objectionable.--Domitius 23:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All mutual Macedonian and Bulgarian foods are either Turkish (which in turn is Middle Eastern influenced) or they are all over the Balkans and we can fight for ages over who invented them. Its accurate to say that it is similar, but not influenced. Take your nationalist tendencies elsewhere please. --Bonina 23:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As mention before, provide sources that there is no influence between the two national cuisines.   bout /FunkyFly.talk_  23:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You provide that there is, otherwise it should be omitted. By the way, how come you did not write that there is a Serbian influence. They have all the same food as we do? Or you wouldnt know anything about Macedonian cuisine? --Bonina 23:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you are arguing in circles. This discussion is over. Further comments will be removed.   /FunkyFly.talk_  23:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bonaparte edits[edit]

Thanks for support. -- AdrianTM 19:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Христос Воскресе![edit]

Truly He has! Thank you Funky, and many happy returns! NikoSilver 11:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sveti Kliment[edit]

My edits about Sveti Kliment are sourced, see the discussion page of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin taleski (talkcontribs)

Not really. Read Wikipedia:Reliable sources.   /FunkyFly.talk_  19:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No sources for bulgarian origin as well!

Martin taleski 20:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plenty.   /FunkyFly.talk_  20:01, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Then be polite enough to show them Martin taleski 20:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I will, while your are enduring your block and are unable to revert them.   /FunkyFly.talk_  20:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strangely, but i do not seem to be getting a block... Martin taleski 20:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, and your patience will be rewarded.   /FunkyFly.talk_  20:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but no patience... i am going out to a gig, and when i come back please let me see some sources. Have a pleasant evening! Martin taleski 20:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, it should be done by then.   /FunkyFly.talk_  20:42, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Абре, блгарче ште мора да се нагодиме според западно-европејските стандарди и да ги решиме нашите несогласенија... И сам знaиш да Блгарија е сега в`в европејскија сајуз и не бива вака по балкански да си ја тераме, зашчо и двајцата ште кркаме блок. И моља ти да ми простиш за мојо Блгарски, оти ја сум отаде Пирин, ама гољам мерак ми е да си лафам по нашки... обаче, нија и вака и така сме един народ в`в две држави, зарем не?


ајде те молам прими топли поздрави од Вардарска с`с песната:
Минаха години, без да те забравам ас
Чакам те да дојдиш, чакам те с`с бујна страс
Спомена по тебе никогаш не ште изгасне
Многу дни ште минат, маката ште ми порасне...
62.162.187.37 11:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You continue to edit war despite prior blocks for the problem. Furthermore, six reverts in two days, three each in 15 minute spurts, at Clement of Ohrid, indicates not just an unwillingness to pursue dispute resolution rather than fighting, but also an attempt to game the WP:3RR. You must engage in polite discussion and mediation in future conflicts, or the blocks will escalate. Dmcdevit·t 09:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't like your sig[edit]

Just a quick note to say I don't like your sig. Too garish and aggressive, result is too outstanding on the page. My POV, of course. --maf 02:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Clement of Ohrid, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

Request for Mediation[edit]

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Clement of Ohrid.
For the Mediation Committee, ^demon[omg plz]
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.
This message delivered: 18:34, 23 April 2007 (UTC).

Debate on the correct adjective for Kosovo[edit]

Hi! Based on your interest in the Balkans, you may be interested in the currently ongoing debate on whether we should be using Kosovo or Kosovar/Kosovan as the adjective for Kosovo. —Nightstallion 15:15, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:FunkyStalin.gif listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:FunkyStalin.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:42, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Prespa e Vogël and Golloborda. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prespa e Vogël and Golloborda. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kniga donski.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kniga donski.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:22, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Aleksandar Donski, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksandar Donski. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 01:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]