User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive
Archives


Not so urgent

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, Future Perfect at Sunrise. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Proto-greek language

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, Future Perfect at Sunrise. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Yo Ho Ho

Discussion to move "String" to "String (disambiguation)"

In order to make way for moving Draft:String to article space to take the place as the primary topic, I've posted a proposal at Talk:String#Requested move 16 January 2017 to move the disambiguation page currently at "String" to "String (disambiguation)". Your input would be helpful to establish a common consensus on whether or not this move, or something else, should be done. I look forward to your thoughts on the matter.

Based upon your concern that one of the other articles named "string" might have a stronger claim to the primary topic, I've posted notices at Talk:String (music), Talk:String (computer science), Talk:String (physics), and Talk:Strings (tennis), to give the editors there a chance to weigh in. If you think notices should be posted elsewhere as well, please let me know, and I'll be happy to oblige. The Transhumanist 23:02, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

AN/I deletion

Hello FPAS, with great hesitation and reluctance I'm asking if you'd reconsider this [1]. As far as I know there's no requirement to have an account to comment on AN/I, much as I'd encourage everyone to create one. Even if you think the comment was in some way trolling or malicious, it was expressed calmly and if you disagree with it then either reply or (preferably) ignore it. Would you consider reverting your deletion? If you're unwilling to do so, I'll do it myself if I can work out how to do so without totally messing up the page.... Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 13:47, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @Kim Dent-Brown: I reckon loads of people think it's this LTA. So I reckon loads of people will WP:DENY. Cheers! O Fortuna!...Imperatrix mundi. 14:01, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
No, I don't think it's that particular creep (although Vote X was previously also active in the same thread and they are from the same geolocation). I do think though it's the same anon that first created the thread, and who has been harassing Wtshymansky for months and got repeatedly blocked for it. We should treat any attempt of him reinserting himself in this matter as an instance of ban evasion. Fut.Perf. 14:10, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Well I wish to god somebody would close that discussion up instead of letting it fester. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 14:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
I second that. Couldn't you close it, for instance? Fut.Perf. 14:27, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
I could, and I have. How long before the first com plaint on my talk page? Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 15:02, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, good job. Fut.Perf. 16:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC)