Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
Your submission at Articles for creation: CP-6 (October 17)
Personally I like your work on CP-6. I disagree with the powers-that-be that it doesn't deserve a separate article (for what that's worth). The amount of material probably overwhelms UTS in the existing article. A lot of what you say might be considered "original research"' but it's certainly interesting. Maybe when you're done make a proposal on the talk page to split the articles. Peter Flass (talk) 00:05, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
- I want to second what Peter said. In the Teahouse I always try to put forward a unified front with other editors as much as possible and in any case the Teahouse wasn't the right forum to have a long debate on it but I definitely think the CP6 content merits it's own page. If I were you I would ignore the whole issue of folding the CP6 content into UTSS and just focus on making the CP6 article worth standing on its own merit. RedDog (talk) 15:10, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Universal Time-Sharing System may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- In the fall of 1975, Honeywell accepted a proposal from Hank Hoagland and Shel Klee to form LADC (in an old Xerox office building rented for 50 cents a square foot(about 20% of the market rate at
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CP-6, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.