This user is an Indian at heart.
This user is a member of the OTRS response team and has a page on Wikimedia OTRS-wiki.
This user repairs links to disambiguation pages
This user is registered on the Access to nonpublic information policy noticeboard.
This user has page mover rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has new page reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has extended confirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has autoconfirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has autopatrolled rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has AutoWikiBrowser permissions on the English Wikipedia.
This user uses Huggle to fight vandalism.
This user uses Twinkle to fight vandalism.
This user uses HotCat to work with categories.
Trout this user

User talk:GSS

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:GSS-1987)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Contents

Sudeep Karat[edit]

Please check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sudeep_Karat I have provided enough references. https://g.co/kgs/ermCSR — Preceding unsigned comment added by K2share (talkcontribs) 10:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC) Please check added some more references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by K2share (talkcontribs) 11:11, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Nitin Passi[edit]

Further update: Hi GSS, removed Proposed for Deletion tag, and edited to answer concerns about number of references. Added The Times, The Telegraph, The Mirror, The Financial Times, amongst others. Very interested to have a discussion about where the line lies on notability, but I think Passi falls on the side of notability -- if anything because he appears notable enough for The Sunday Times, Drapers, etc, to publish personal reporting. ScepticalChymist (talk) 13:12, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi GSS, I have reverted Nitin Passi, and put up a flag for notability to encourage discussion. Argument for notability is his contributions / profile within the UK fashion industry. Feel merit is accorded from the third guideline from WO:BIO, ie, "The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field." Given that he founded -- and continues to run -- probably the fast growing fashion company in the UK, I think it is didficult not to qualify on that criteria. He also have a substantial media presence. Added a notability tag to encourage debate / discussion. ScepticalChymist (talk) 11:40, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

The Iyer Project[edit]

Hi GSS, I see that you have moved the page The Iyer Project into the draft section. I have submitted it for review and will wait for it. While you are right that I am involved with the band, however, I have specifically tried to keep the language neutral. The sources mentioned are authentic and credible. Let me know your views and let me know how it can be improved. Cheers (Moulisekaran (talk) 04:48, 5 February 2019 (UTC))

Deleterion of David Demola[edit]

Dear Vinay Gowda,

The subject is notable and featured on Christian networks. He has been accredited by Creflo Dollar and preaches to the 38th largest megachurch in the country as of 2017. Please do not mess with articles on prominent Christian leaders. May I have the original work for self-review and I will redo this article with sources for credibility? This will be redone neutrally and in an encyclopedic way.
Yours truly, John1427 (talk) 17:08 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Created Wikipedia page for actor Siddharth Mahesh[edit]

Hi Vinay Gowda created but he is not updated anything on the page, so please guide me how to verify wikipedia page and also uploading profile photo to the page

Deletion Discussion : Anil K Reji[edit]

Hey

The page Anil K Reji has been nominated for deletion. Kindly let me know what can be done to prevent the deletion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anil_K_Reji

Valid sources and news articles have been included as references in the article. But it still has been nominated for deletion. Kindly assist me through the walkthrough process of preventing the deletion.

Thanks.

Repeated Reverting on article on "Samiksha Jaiswal".[edit]

Respected Sir/Madam,

Please tell why are you repeatedly reverting the article on Samiksha Jaiswal to #Redirect Zindagi Ki Mehek?

@Helpful14: As Barkeep49 mentioned in the edit summary that the subject not yet demonstrated to be notable per WP:NACTOR so please do not revert as it's WP:TOOSOON for this actress to have a separate article. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em)

Edits made in Ram Awana Page[edit]

hi, Thank you for your reply. Whatever changes I made, have video references on youtube or some other sites. Can I not add such references? as Ram Awana is an actor internet is providing only video references. Please suggest what can I do. User:Gazal288 (talk) Thank you, Gazal288

Note[edit]

You may be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Conflict_of_interest#Must_COI_authors_out_their_new_page_through_AfC?; I think one of your interactions with Barkeep49 spurred them to begin the aforementioned thread. SamHolt6 (talk) 06:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

A brownie for you![edit]

Brownie transparent.png Jesus loves you! He is the WORD that gives life! John1427 (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Kitten in a helmet.jpg

Jesus loves you

John1427 (talk) 22:12, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Notice[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Contentious_Deletion_Discussions_of_EverlyWell_and_Draft:EverlyWell_and_User:Mohamed_Ouda. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:48, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Pages by Paid Editors, and Other Troublesome Pages[edit]

Please do not draftify a page more than once, even if it is undersourced or paid editing or otherwise should not be in article space. Draftifying a page more than once is move-warring, and is just as disruptive as the move to article space more than once by the proponent is. Please take such pages to Articles for Deletion instead. As you have seen, repeated draftification or other move-warring not only divides the Wikipedia community but divides the community of honest editors who oppose paid editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:59, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks and noted. I can understand the situation but it sounds like we are giving more wings to paid editors by allowing them to move their article back to mainspace and then stay in peace. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:39, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
User:GSS - I understand your concern, but if a paid editor is willing to promote a paid article more than once, is there any reason to think that demoting (draftifying) it more than once will finalize its status? If you demote an article a second time, then please nominate it for deletion from draft space, or nominate it for deletion from article space when it is promoted a second or third time. Move-warring is disruptive, and it doesn't result in a win. Please. Don't just move-war. We "give more wings" to them just as much by sinking to their level and move-warring as we would by leaving their spam in article space. Getting rid of spam is one of the reasons why we have XFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:49, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

You've got mail![edit]

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, GSS. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 19:40, 19 January 2019 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

TonyBallioni (talk) 19:40, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Add one from me.WBGconverse 18:26, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Those Who Inspire Ltd[edit]

Paid editing - Those Who Inspire Ltd.

Hello GSS. This is the reply to your message left on my talk page.

Kindly allow me to share with you that I am not paid by anyone to create the small article for Those Who Inspire. As explained to Victor as well, I am a young person who has been following Those Who Inspire for years. Thanks to them I found some of the most valuable mentors I could ever have. I think this entry on wiki is just a means to share with more people the work done by this organisation. Therefore, I do not understand why it is considered as promotional... for example, as this is the first time I am creating an article from scratch, I checked the entry of Ted Talks... why is the entry of Those Who Inspire so different and promotional from the one of Ted Talk?

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicoleta1992 (talkcontribs) 08:43, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

@Nicoleta1992: well an advertisement on upwork.com seems enough to confirm paid editing and you were clearly promoting the subject here on Wikipedia. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:13, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
@GSS: I have no idea what is upwork.com, I have never used this plaltform. In what sense I was promoting the subject on Wikipedia if you could be more specific please? Nicoleta1992 (talk) 12:11, 21 January 2019 (CET)

A barnstar for you![edit]

WikiDefender Barnstar Hires.png The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Reckon you're owed this; your hard work helping to keep Wikipedia free of black-hat SEO is appreciated. Yunshui  09:04, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Face-smile.svg Thank you very much! GSS (talk|c|em) 10:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Artcontrarian name[edit]

Thank you for leaving a note about my username in possible conflict because it appears to represent a website - just googled it and found a blogger in Seattle... I'm in Washington, DC (the other Washington :-), but I get your point and I don't want to erroneously be associated with whoever that gent in Seattle is, so will ask for a name change request and be safe ---- Appreciate suggestion!

Not "that" Art Contrarian--Artcontrarian (talk) 20:50, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

[edit]

Hi GSS, I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. So far I have only contributed 2 entries, both on subjects of particular interest to me. In the case of the digital marketing canvas one (still in draft category) I have received other comments concerning style, references and context so I will be making further edits. Anyway, I thank you for pointing out wikipedia policies on the matter. Coquemp (talk) 23:25, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

@Coquemp: while the assumption of good faith is a key policy on Wikipedia, credible evidence seems to contradict your statement. Please clarify your status at the earliest possible convenience, and note that undisclosed paid editors are prohibited from editing Wikipedia. SamHolt6 (talk) 00:01, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Coquemp has been blocked for violating terms of use. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:08, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of Vijay Kalvani[edit]

Hello, respected Sir/Ma'am

Mr. Vijay Kalvani has been named on Forbes celebrity list 2015 , he has been part of several television shows and also a couple of films.

I think Forbes is a pretty good reliable source.

Please let me know your take on that.

Thank you very much. Mortalrahu (talk) 17:13, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Not according to the citation given. There's a Vijay Kalwani (notice the different spelling) listed as nominated, but anyone can be nominated. Arguably, a person who was one of the 100 chosen might be notable (but, probably that alone wouldn't be enough), but just nominated? No. I could be nominated and I don't even live in India, nor am I Indian or a celebrity. --Yamla (talk) 17:44, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Changes on Dubai Multi Commodities Centre[edit]

Hi GSS,

I noted that you have reverted my edits on Dubai Multi Commodities Centre. I have removed promotional content from the page and have disclosed the paid contribution on the talk page of the article. Request you to please put my edits back on the page. Thanks.

27.106.115.131 (talk) 15:48, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

@27.106.115.131: Can you please disclose all accounts you created, regardless of whether you used them or we know about them. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:55, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

DMCC page edits[edit]

Hi GSS,

thanks for your comments on the DMCC page. I work with DMCC and they have an issue with their wiki page since November as they someone was asked to go in and update old information and inadvertently added copy that was then tagged as promo/advertising content.

Please can you advise what needs to be done to remove the tags while also having the latest information on the page?

I've been through and added the relevant citations, I've removed the promo copy and cleaned up to comply with policies.

FYI edits made by 94.200.47.110 are also mine.

Would it be possible to revert to this version and I can then suggest some edits? - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dubai_Multi_Commodities_Centre&oldid=863194937 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phoenixfrom1973 (talkcontribs) 07:00, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Many thanks.

Robert

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Phoenixfrom1973 (talkcontribs) 06:32, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

The tags must stay until it meets the standard of WP:NPOV and WP:V. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:14, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

I have edited the copy to align from NPOV and all relevant citations are included. If you feel that the text is still not NPOV compliant and further citations are needed, then can you please let me know which text and where citations are requirted and I will propose edits accordingly.

User:27.106.115.131 has also made edits aligned with NPOV, but you rolled those back. Paid contribution was disclosed as part of the edits.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Phoenixfrom1973 (talkcontribs) 07:18, 6 February 2019 (UTC) 
First of all, COI and paid editors are not allowed to edit affected articles directly, but they can propose changes on article talk pages instead. The article reads like a corporate profile than an encyclopedia entry and the source you added here wasn't reliable. The 3rd, 4th and 5th section lacks inline citations.


GSS (talk|c|em) 07:31, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Have added citations as requested and removed promotional sounding copy as directed. Have proposed these changes on the article talk page as you instructed. Please advise if any additional issues.

Many thanks. Robert

@Phoenixfrom1973: I know I personally learn best by example, so I tried to make some changes as an example edit. I'm not willing to spend more time sprucing up the article because I have no interest in the subject. However, I do have an interest in the quality of this encyclopedia. GSS is right to warn you about COI and paid editing; it's a thorny subject on a website that purportedly aggregates notable content from a neutral standpoint backed by reliable, third-party sources (again, as GSS pointed out earlier, see WP:NPOV and WP:V). Airplaneman 08:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Can you check the tags at Novita article?[edit]

Hi there! You added some warnings at Novita_(company) in October. Can you check now if they can be removed? Jjanhone (talk) 18:21, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Ramvir_(singer) and Tom Coleman (fitness model)[edit]

Hi GSS, first of all thank you for reviewing the articles I recently submitted. Unfortunately both of the articles I submitted has been moved to draft space. However I did not lose hope and will try to make the articles better and try to move it to main space. I would really appreciate if you please put some light on how I should improve these articles before I submit it to AFC. Thank you in advance Sumitpatelster (talk) 18:01, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

As per Wikipedia's 'golden rule' the subject of an article needs multiple independent, reliable sources that talk about the subject in-depth. So you need to provide some reliable sources that are independent of the subject and submit it for a review once you are done. Please don't move it back to mainspace yourself until you get a second opinion as to whether it is ready for article space. GSS (talk|c|em) 02:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi, you have asked me to add more references to the articles. I added a lot of references to Tom Coleman's page, still it has been decline by you without leaving any comment? Did you see those references? What else I can add or remove? Could you please suggest. Waiting for your reply. Sumitpatelster (talk) 04:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Arthur Chang[edit]

User:GSS, I can see that you have reverted edits. Can you tell me how to solve UDP issue on this page or what else it still left to clean this page? 157.47.139.29 (talk) 08:35, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

SPI behavior diff[edit]

Can you please take a look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Harsh7agl and compare the behavior of this suspect. Asking you since you had filed other cases on this user. the admin wants some diff to go ahead. regards. --DBigXray 06:24, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

@DBigXray: Take a look at this and this (note the infobox) and I guess we have WorkPKG (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) as well see this. GSS (talk|c|em) 07:55, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Indeed, this is obvious, specially the infobox layout. Please post this on the SPI page. --DBigXray 08:19, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Working on it. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:20, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Wrong Thought Process[edit]

There is no financial stake process. I earn more than what people can offer me for creating an article here. Please don't give me that blame. You might be an admin. I respect you for that. But, please don't say things which you don't know. I help people. That's the end of the it. You require more citations, resources, I will help you with that.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suryasankarroy (talkcontribs) 18:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

@Suryasankarroy: Thank you for responding. Do you know "Krishnendu Chatterjee" personally? GSS (talk|c|em) 05:40, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Yes sir. That is the reason I am creating it. I have submitted an email to OTRS but I have asked him to drop an email as well for any copyright issues. There is no monetary involvement here. If you need further clarification, do let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suryasankarroy (talkcontribs) 19:31, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
@Suryasankarroy: Please see WP:COI, WP:PAID and disclose your conflict of interest on your user page per WP:DISCLOSE. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 05:52, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

I am NOT A PAID EDITOR OR WHATSOEVER! Now, you are annoying me with your words! Are you from India? No, Are you from West Bengal India? No! Then, how would you know about the people living here? Please excuse me. If I get paid for any wikipedia article ever, I will mention that. Thank you and have a nice day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suryasankarroy (talkcontribs) 12:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Mirror Khabar[edit]

Hello GSS. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mirror Khabar, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: previously declined. Please be aware that re-tagging might be considered forum-shopping. Thank you. SoWhy 14:00, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Didn't notice it was previously declined, but anyways thanks for your notification. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:04, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Combinatorial chemistry[edit]

Hi. You removed images I uploaded to the Combinatorial Chemistry article because of your concern that they were not original creations. In fact, the content comes from published articles (as referenced) but the images were created by me for the purpose of addition to the article. I would like you to revert the deletion. Let me know if you have any questions.- AWCzarnik (talk) 06:18, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Dino James[edit]

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, GSS. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

or

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, GSS. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--Priyanka Bhambhani (talk) 18:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Please Remove the Move Protection Block and then Move Draft:Dj Goz page back to Dj Goz in the Article Namespace[edit]

Hi GSS,

I created an article about this artist/producer known as "Dj Goz" that i saw perform a couple of years ago when i visited the university of Idaho. I then did some research to learn more about him, liked what he has done for other artists in Idaho and in Africa, and wanted to write an article about him to let the world know about him and his work.

I am not directly or indirectly being compensated by him or anyone on his behalf, i just want to share this article with the world.

Please remove the block and publish the oage in the Article namespace. I provided the references about him and citations that i have been able to gather so far, for notability, and i am sure other people will add more as they find the article about him.

Thank you for your understanding and sorry for the confusion.

Best Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by GreatMagOBI (talkcontribs) 06:30, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi GSS,

I created an article about this artist/producer known as "Dj Goz" that i saw perform a couple of years ago when i visited the university of Idaho. I then did some research to learn more about him, liked what he has done for other artists in Idaho and in Africa, and wanted to write an article about him to let the world know about him and his work.

I am not directly or indirectly being compensated by him or anyone on his behalf, i just want to share this article with the world.

Please remove the block and publish the page in the Article main space. I provided references about him and citations that i have been able to gather so far, for notability, and i am sure other people will add more about him as they find the article about him online.

Thank you for your understanding and sorry for the confusion.

Looking forward to seeing the article about Dj Goz moved from the draft space and published in the main space.

Best Regards,

©Magellan 07:50, 23 February 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GreatMagOBI (talkcontribs)

A beer for you![edit]

Export hell seidel steiner.png India Iamzine13 (talk) 17:54, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Want to learn About Wikipedia Editing & Restrictions[edit]

Hi, I'm very much Curious about wikipedia editing & creating clean articles, and also prevent getting blocked. I want to contribute to wikipedia for India. I'm interested in learning it from you. Can you please give me your email so that we can probably talk over there? Or here is mine (akshayzine@icloud.com) I want learn safe & correct editing so that no vandalism or unwanted articles would get created. Iamzine13 (talk) 18:01, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Merit Leighton[edit]

I see you move the page I created to draft. Can you explain why you did that? I also saw a message saying I am a paid editor, this is totally untrue and I challenge you to prove it. Merit Leighton is very notable considering the roles she has played in award winning films/tv shows. Why will you suggest that I am a paid editor. Is Wikipedia not a place for information anymore? Kindly take it back to mainspaceLaboj (talk) 12:03, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

@Laboj: Please see my message on your talk page to know why I draftified your article, and regarding paid editing can you please explain where did you get this image from? Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:12, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Re-submission of page, Tushar Pandey[edit]

Hi, We have made changes as per requested by Mr.Tushar Pandey, request you to kindly approve it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheRock171 (talkcontribs) 13:09, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Frank Fitzpatrick[edit]

Hey there. I noticed you put a paid edit as part of the issues on the Frank Fitzpatrick Article. I do not believe this is necessary now, given the Talk page now has the full and proper disclosure linking back to my Userpage, and that such declarations do not exist on other pages I have been paid for, such as Amit Sharma (director), Health Australia Party, and Autotrader.com. It'd be great to know what the difference is here, as I do not believe the article is written from an non-NPOV - like the others - although I would appreciate a second pair of eyes. Thanks. MrMarkBGregory (talk) 10:47, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

@MrMarkBGregory: Both templates are different. The article sounds promotional to me, and I feel a number of references are also not reliable. Pinging @Winged Blades of Godric and SamHolt6: who I believe have very good knowledge on paid editing. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:01, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Excellent, thank you. I'm very happy to discuss this issue further and remedy. Feel free to transfer this discussion to the article's talk page. MrMarkBGregory (talk) 11:19, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
@MrMarkBGregory:@GSS: I am inclined to maintain the template in question. The article has several issues with it that should be addressed. For one, the primary sources from Huffpost ([1], [2]) need to be replaced or the content they are supporting removed; the same goes for the PRWeb source and IMDB, as the former is unreliable and the latter's bio entry was written by one of Fitzpatrick's companies. Furthermore, some of the article's content seems to be somewhat superfluous namedropping—the single-sentence "early life" subheading and the first sentence under the "Songwriter and Music Producer" subheading are the worst culprits from what I can see. Lastly, a neutral editor should commence a cleanup of the article and search for more sources so that article provides neutral view of the subject; looking at the history of the article, every single major addition of content has been done by either an SPA or a paid editor, and as such the article may be unbalanced by virtue of purposely-excluded coverage; this last point is secondary to the previous points, but should still be entertained. Best.--SamHolt6 (talk) 15:10, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
@GSS and SamHolt6: Thanks for your honest and thorough feedback. Many of the concerns you have raised I had also raised with Fitzpatrick while we were working on the article; I had suggested a much cleaner version of the page which I may now revert back to. For the record, I have already been paid, so any further edits to make this article as reliable and useful as possible are done from my own desire to have a good quality article here, so I hope we can assume good faith from here on in that regard. I will address the issues raised above, and examine the sources once again to see if it can be further tidied. Thanks again. MrMarkBGregory (talk) 16:58, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Shaktimaan (TV Series) Moved back to Shaktimaan[edit]

Hello @GSS:, I made that move but I didn't mean to vandalize the article, all I was wanted that Shaktimaan deserves a separate article than just the TV show as other superheroes have their own individual fictional character article so I moved the original article to new page with redirect because I don't know how to move without leaving redirect. you did moved back but you didn't revert my edits so I did that now. Shaktimaan please check it's Biography section that was remained undone because I created a separate article for Fictional Biography of the character. -- MrZINE | talk 09:28, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

@Iamzine13: Thank you for undoing your edit. If you wish to create a separate page for the fictional character, please follow the article for creation process. The draft is located at Draft:Shaktimaan (fictional character). GSS (talk|c|em) 09:41, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Sanjay Chhimpa[edit]

why are you decline this draft ......Verify all the facts of the draft I wrote, it is not worth it to return Please verify — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:118A:FC6A:181A:3AC:9DD8:A4C8 (talk) 12:36, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Reversion of Article "SmartBuyGlasses Optical Group" to draft[edit]

 Hello, GSS I am aware of the WP:3RR and I want to just clearly understand what's wrong with the article mentioned. You made the first reversion without any comment and on our discussion you only raised the issue about my disclosure of whether I had been compensated for the piece and I cleared the issue. The second reversion you just mentioned the draft is not ready and requested me to follow the AfC submission process. I just want to clearly understand what needs to be done or whats missing.
 --Mwangi2017 (talk) 15:34, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

deleting a page[edit]

please look into this matter Anadika Guleria Azaad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Syedishujaat (talkcontribs) 21:11, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

@Syedishujaat: Do you know "Anadika Guleria Azaad" personally? Who asked you to create her page? This looks like undiclosed paid editing so please read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID and as previously advised, you must disclose who asked you to edit which pages. GSS (talk|c|em) 03:26, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
This is not the way you talk i dont know anadika personally but she is notable women in india. Not every notables information are on web sometime you need to check offline and stop calling me paid editor shujaat (talk) 14:34, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
@Syedishujaat: Where did you get File:Anadika1100.jpg and File:Anadika110.jpg from? GSS (talk|c|em) 14:41, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
i click these pictures myself i didnt got it from somewhere its my own work you won't find these images anywhere on the internet shujaat (talk) 18:15, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
@Syedishujaat: But didn't you say that you don't know her personally, but you somehow took the pictures yourself... DrumSalad (talk) 18:45, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
@Syedishujaat: FYI these are selfies and you can't fool us like this. GSS (talk|c|em) 04:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

New pages[edit]

Hello! I recently created a couple pages (Sabrina Kemeny, Paul Outlaw, and Nightfood). I was wondering if you could look them over and give me some feedback or pointers. I have a few more that I'm planning to write, but I want to make sure that I'm choosing notable enough subjects and I'm going in the right direction. Thanks a lot! DrumSalad (talk) 15:06, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Deleting the page[edit]

So what have you decided shujaat (talk) 09:54, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

@Syedishujaat: You need to disclose your relationship with "Anadika Guleria Azaad" and others you have written about or else you will be reported at WP:COIN for not following the terms of uses. See WP:DISCLOSE. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:25, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Relationship with anadika[edit]

Well i am his friend and i have took the picture shujaat (talk) 18:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Rose Funja[edit]

Hello GSS. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Rose Funja, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not completely promotional (can be cleaned up without a substantial rewrite) / claims significance. Thank you. SoWhy 15:37, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Please participate to the talk pages consultation[edit]

Hello

Our team at the Wikimedia Foundation is working on a project to improve the ease-of-use and productivity of wiki talk pages. As a Teahouse host, I can imagine you’ve run into challenges explaining talk pages to first-time participants.

We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis – to ask questions, to resolve differences, to organize projects and to make decisions. Communication is essential for the depth and quality of our content, and the health of our communities. We're currently leading a global consultation on how to improve talk pages, and we're looking for people that can report on their experiences using (or helping other people to use) wiki talk pages. We'd like to invite you to participate in the consultation, and invite new users to join too.

We thank you in advance for your participation and your help.

Trizek (WMF), 08:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Please participate to the talk pages consultation - link update[edit]

The previous message about the talk pages consultation has a broken link.

The correct link has been misinterpreted by the MassMessage tool. Please use the following link: Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019.

Sorry for the inconvenience, Trizek (WMF), 08:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Pailwaan page redirect revert request[edit]

FreeVoicer (talk) 07:33, 12 March 2019 (UTC) The page "Pailwaan" is redirected to another page because it was created during pre production stage. I apologise for overlooking the norms. Now that the film is in post production stage, it could go live. Kindly help me through this process. Thank You.

Regarding Aravindante Athidhikal[edit]

Now what did you find in this? AhamBrahmasmi (talk) 07:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.17[edit]

Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Hello GSS,

News
Discussions of interest
  • Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
  • {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
  • A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
  • There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.
Reminders
  • NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
NPP Tools Report
  • Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
  • copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
  • The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.


Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

following up on your message[edit]

Hi GSS, I'm following up on the message you left on my talk page. Do you know what has become/will become of the article I wrote about Natalie Brown (Author)? As I stated, this wasn't a paid job for me. I am just a fan and was motivated to start a page about something I like. I'd be grateful for your follow-up and/or advice. Anna.Ablin22 (talk) 18:09, 4 April 2019 (UTC)


Helloooo there :) Gss how can i put my article under review? dont want to post it and get denied I want to be crystal clear first — Preceding unsigned comment added by SergioGonza13 (talkcontribs) 16:44, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.18[edit]

Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Hello GSS,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

  • Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
  • Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News
Discussions of interest

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250


Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)


Cite error: There are <ref group=Note> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=Note}} template (see the help page).