User talk:Gabriel Yuji

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

WP:Fancruft[edit]

Please note that WP:Fancruft is an essay, and therefore can not be used as a valid reason for removing content from articles. If you wish to cite a policy or a guideline when doing so, feel free, but doing this gives the impression that WP:Fancruft is a policy or guideline, and it is not likely to ever attain that status. Thanks for all your hard work! ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 23:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Guilty Gear Xrd Revelator discussion[edit]

Hello! You're invited to express your opinion in the following discussion from an article you've recently edited: Talk:Guilty Gear Xrd#New Article for Revelator? Jotamide (talk) 20:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Allen Walker[edit]

Allen Walker became a GA! I couldn't have done it without you. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 18:46, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Speaking of GAs, sorry about any overlinking on Halden Prison. It's a serious addiction, you know :) GABgab 23:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Haha, GeneralizationsAreBad, just fine! At least, it's a unharmful addiction (except for GA reviewers :P). Gabriel Yuji (talk) 23:25, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey[edit]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

  • Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

A, A Prime[edit]


FF: Spirit Within edit[edit]

No problem! Thanks for the heads up. Andrzejbanas (talk) 06:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A, A Prime[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A, A Prime you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Narutolovehinata5 -- Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 22:20, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A, A Prime[edit]

The article A, A Prime you nominated as a good article has failed Symbol oppose vote.svg; see Talk:A, A Prime for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Narutolovehinata5 -- Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 23:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Halden Prison[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Halden Prison you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 02:21, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Halden Prison[edit]

The article Halden Prison you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Halden Prison for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 08:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Islamo-Leftism[edit]

Hi. You removed a reference from the article with the edit summary "not appropriate per WP:EL". Leaving aside the fact that WP:EL doesn't apply to citations, I don't understand why a professor's faculty page is inappropriate under WP:EL. Could you please explain? Thank you. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 18:47, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Hey, MShabazz, it was not being used as a reference; the reference to that Fraser's statement is this one and I've removed a link to his profile which isn't necessary to support anything there. I've removed it mainly because of WP:ELPOINTS #2: "External links should not normally be used in the body of an article" (though it's my fault that I was not precisely enough in my summary). Thanks, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:56, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation. I thought the website was being used as a source for his being a professor. There was a time when many articles used raw links like that as sources, but thankfully that's no longer the case. Thanks again for the explanation. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 19:05, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Oh, I see your point, MShabazz; but I agree with you that's not necessary (the paper itself describes Fraser). Regards, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 19:09, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Yu Kanda[edit]

I think I found that Graphic source when searching key words "Kanda" and "Willingham" using the engine to find reliable sources from the project. I've hidden that source for now. About nominating it to GA, I'll try doing once it gets copy-edited. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:28, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Berserk 2016[edit]

Thanks for your editing on Berserk 2016 episodes - I've given up. Ozflashman (talk) 13:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Oh, Ozflashman, I hope I haven't done you give up because I'd very much like all help as possible. A co-work is always better and I don't have too much time recently to edit, my English is not the best, and of course I can always miss something important. Cheers, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 15:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The First President of Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karel Kosík, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magnum opus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:List of Brave Witches episodes#Episode summaries[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of Brave Witches episodes#Episode summaries. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 10:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Gabriel Yuji. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Rozen Maiden straw vote[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your input at the AFD. If possible, could you drop by for a straw vote to determine if the article should be redirected (linked here)? Thanks. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 08:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:List of Brave Witches episodes#Lead paragraph[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of Brave Witches episodes#Lead paragraph. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 20:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC)


Merry, merry![edit]

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:08, 26 December 2016 (UTC) Lights ablaze.JPG

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film#"Lists" vs. prose about lists[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film#"Lists" vs. prose about lists. Pyxis Solitary (talk) 11:14, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
(Notification per WP:CAN.)

Trying another FA[edit]

I'm currently working in nominating the GA D.Gray-man to FA but I requested a copyedit and a peer review. The peer review seems to be doing fine, so I wonder if you could you give a look through that also. Also, nice work in the wikipedia articles. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 13:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Also, I don't know if you are aware but I have been working a bit on Yoh Asakura. I'm pretty sure it passes notability, but I've just realized the appearances section is incomplete with both the manga and anime series. It is potentially a GA if it also referenced too but I don't what to do with the techniques section. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 13:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Yes, Tintor2, I saw your changes since I watch this page; nice job. I would just remove techniques for containing too much WP:IN-U and/or try to incorporate the most relevant parts into the appearance section. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 00:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

"White Bear" copyedit[edit]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article "White Bear" (Black Mirror) has been completed.

You might want to give some thought to shortening the Themes and Reception sections. I'm sure a GA reviewer will point out that a lot of the reviews/comments are repetitive. The most important review vehicles are probably the ones to leave in.

You will notice that I archived one of the article’s citations (#3). I suggest you archive the rest of the article’s URLs as time allows. This ensures that the article's references are available "forever" and that it doesn’t develop "dead links" over time. The site I use is https://archive.org/web/. Simply copy the URL in the citation and paste it in the "Save Page Now" box on the archive.org site and click "Save". This creates a copy of the original page and provides you with a new URL to add to the original citation. If you look at the URL I've archived you'll see the syntax. You add the new URL to the end of the original citation like this: |archiveurl=http etc|archivedate=28 February 2017}}. Not all websites allow archiving, so there's not much you can do about that unless there is an alternate citation you could use.

Good luck with the GAN

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)