User talk:Gary Dee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Thank you[edit]

Modest Barnstar.png The Modest Barnstar
Thanks for your recent contributions! - (talk) 18:57, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Thx too. ;) --Gary Dee (talk) 19:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Gary Dee. You have new messages at Talk:Saturn.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I Strongly agree with the link removal. Thanks for being bold and removing them.--Anderson I'm Willing To Help 21:43, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Thx. ;) --Gary Dee 17:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you![edit]

Erdbeerteller01.jpg For your malware edits particularly Huge-LQG Martin451 (talk) 21:57, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Thx. :) --Gary Dee 17:53, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

twitter blogs pictures[edit]

are not reputable sources. I sail my ship in that area, it does not mean I am involved in the search.Cantab1985 (talk) 12:11, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Again not a reputable source[edit]

HMS Defender is not a cruiser. And you are not discussing.Cantab1985 (talk) 12:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello. Now i am: As you showed a compromise, i take this as done. Thanks therefor. The following answer was just about to cross my lips:

You are clearly trying to provoke an Editwar. The last Reference is reputable. Why ?

So stop denying every References, Stop making points as a comma. ETC. And by the way: Better read this:

- I will revert this once more, and your next step will be obvious an EditWar. All links together say it clearly that the HMS Defender was involved in the search. Period. STOP it here. Please. Thx & Regards.

So, as said, thank you for your comprehension. --Gary Dee 13:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

HMS Defender[edit]

Hi Gary,

I just want to explain why I removed the MarineTraffic link. One, as we discussed yesterday that page has some serious errors on it and would confuse a non-ship specialist as to which ship that page is actually talking about. Therefore, the link cannot be considered a reliable source. Aside from that, Defender being in that area might not have anything to do with the search. That destroyer could be tracking Russian air movement over Syria, or Turkish air movement over the Greek border. We don't know unless there is an official announcement saying that the ship is participating in the search. Just want to clarify my position. Have a good day. Llammakey (talk) 12:54, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi Llammakey

Thats the way i like it to start a discussion, as you show manners. I accept your explaining now (about the MarineTraffic Link). Thank you for your explanation. I will as well reply to cantab1985 after this ;) --Gary Dee 13:08, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Hey Gary. I just went through all the other sources you've posted. They all seem to be copypastes of the Fox News article you posted yesterday. However the Fox News article has since been updated and corrected while the other sites are still using the alpha version of the report. From what I understand of Defender's mission in the area, it was deployed to the Middle East to monitor Russian air movement. It later deployed to escort RMS Queen Mary 2 when that ship transited the Gulf of Oman according to meretmarine in April. That's what I can find on Defender's mission so far.
I know. I was also checking the waybackmachine, but nothing found there. I know exactly that Fox had it written there. And i know that you checked it to verify. Next time i should better save the page first @ Waybackmachine. :( --Gary Dee 13:20, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Been there before ;) Llammakey (talk) 14:28, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Walter Rhodes (disambiguation)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Walter Rhodes (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 18:23, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Igfxtray.exe[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Igfxtray.exe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet software notability requirements: WP:NOTE. It is simply a small component of a third-party driver, and seems to have no coverage except in "what is this file?" listings.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 12:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)