Hello, Gavin99799, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page HMS Queen Elizabeth (R08) have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. BilCat (talk) 23:17, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Someone keeps changing the HMS Queen Elizabeth page
The ship is under testing and trials, yesterday it started a fast cruise which is just before sailing
The status fitting out means fitting out, it's complete and now about to sail in a few weeks
How can u stop people from changing back
Gavin99799, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Royal Navy. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 10:20, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- To second BilCat's comment, edit warring is considered disruptive editing. You should go to the article's talk page and discuss why you believe your edits are constructive, and if you reach consensus that they should be included. (Also, please note that it appears you have been editing while logged out on this article; that is frowned upon, as editing the same article while logged out and logged in can be seen as an attempt to appear as multiple editors supporting your position. - The Bushranger One ping only 10:36, 10 December 2017 (UTC)