User talk:George Ho

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

I must confess that I am mostly inept at social communications and may not understand "nuances of a conversation", quote by Magog the Ogre. I am mentored by those below. Please be cautious before posting messages to me.

"Unilaterally opposed"[edit]

Thank you for your work on the ITN page. I thought I might mention that I believe you are inadvertently misusing the word "unilaterally." A "unilateral" decision is one made by just one person or just one side of an argument. In this context, when you post "Unilaterally opposed," that could be misread to mean that you, by yourself, are closing the discussion because you oppose. If what you mean is that everyone has opposed, then a better wording would be "Unanimously opposed" or "Uniformly opposed". (Although even that would probably be wrong as the proposer probably wouldn't oppose, so the more conventional wording "No consensus to post" might be better still.) Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 16:21, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2015 Hong Kong protests (July 2)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:57, 2 July 2015 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! George Ho, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:57, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

RfC: Jimi Hendrix[edit]

Hi! Would you care to comment at this RfC regarding the article Jimi Hendrix? It is about whether "acid rock" belongs in the infobox or not. Dan56 (talk) 22:23, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Shooting of Walter Scott[edit]

Do try and pass this thank you on. Thanks. Victuallers (talk) 00:11, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Curtis Culwell Center attack[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

ITN for Saud bin Faisal bin Abdulaziz Al Saud[edit]

--SpencerT♦C 12:31, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Please[edit]

Do not insert your signature, inside others posts - it is not good form, and very confusing.

Also on western australian railway articles, you have inserted inside block socks posts.

Please do separate posts, so that your signature is outside of the blocked socks posts.

Thank you. JarrahTree 10:47, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Well so much for reminding, the bot is dumb and should be re-designed to put the rm sig outside, it needs changing JarrahTree 23:29, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Brad Carter (actor)[edit]

Hello George! I saw you doing some corrections on Brad Carter (actor). Can you please do a little more copy-edit and a rewrite where I used bad wordings? And after you are done with that please inform the copy-edit at Template:Did you know nominations/Brad Carter (actor). Thanks. --Captain Assassin! «TCG» 13:07, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Intelius/inome[edit]

I think the consensus is clear that it should be Intelius. I was the one that questioned the move, but we've pretty much figured out what happened: inome filed a dba that basically undid their rename, so inome and Intelius are the same company. No one is contesting this. The only bit missing is exactly when the dba was filed, but we know it was within the past year from what sources we have. --Ronz (talk) 16:26, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Hey[edit]

I'm sorry I didn't respond, real life is exploding and I've got some wiki harassment. I can't close anything because I'm not an admin AFAIK. I'm just a wikignome (despite years and years of service) and I never had a mentor, so if that is incorrect, let me know and I'll look into the procedure. Ogress smash! 01:41, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Hexaquark[edit]

What bot could possibly require someone to stick a comment in the middle of someone else's comment? Primefac (talk) 14:26, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

See WP:RM. And also User:RM bot. --George Ho (talk) 14:26, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Ah, thank you. I guess I've just never seen a move proposal relisted. Primefac (talk) 14:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:I'm coming out diana ross US single.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:I'm coming out diana ross US single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for 2015 Baltimore protests[edit]

Materialscientist (talk) 01:22, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know/Preparation area 5[edit]

Thank you for fixing the template. Now, how do I reduce the size of the image to 100x100px? Yoninah (talk) 22:29, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Ask them at WT:DYK. --George Ho (talk) 22:30, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Edward Ryan relist[edit]

Please undo your relist at Talk:Edward Ryan (disambiguation). There is no opposition to the move and there is clear agreement for what the disambiguation will be. Adding another week is pointless. Jenks24 (talk) 16:51, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

One guy said "lawyer"; other said "barrister". We can't just supervote and close. --George Ho (talk) 16:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
He said lawyer before the relevant convention was pointed out and saying it "would be fine" is noncommittal. In addition, there are three users supporting barrister. To say moving it to barrister would be a supervote is borderline ridiculous. Please undo the relist. Jenks24 (talk) 17:03, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Counting you would be unfair to the results. How about one "lawyer" and two "barrister"? To me, more votes are needed. Two over one? George Ho (talk) 17:06, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
How on earth is counting me, one of the participants in the discussion, unfair? The opinion of the nominator is just as valid as anyone else. Please undo the relist. Jenks24 (talk) 17:09, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
I can't do that. I have standards, okay? --George Ho (talk) 20:41, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

1st Indian Cavalry Brigade[edit]

George, I requested a move of 1st Indian Cavalry Brigade to 1st (Risalpur) Cavalry Brigade. I see that you have "relisted" it. Am I right in thinking that this pushes the request back a week? Hamish59 (talk) 14:52, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

The bot relisted it to another week, but be patient. There should be votes. --George Ho (talk) 22:25, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the explanation: I did not realise a bot was at work. With regard to votes, can I assume that if no one objects, then it will be moved? Hamish59 (talk) 08:04, 29 July 2015 (UTC)