User talk:Gigitoe

Welcome!

Hello, Gigitoe, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 23:10, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Top of the world

Hmm. It seems to me that your top of the world designation for so many mountains might be WP:OR. Can you add citations for this designation for each mountain? Maybe take a break from editing so many mountains and see what others think before making so many edits? Cxbrx (talk) 05:06, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. You're completely correct in emphasizing the importance of including citations for each mountain, particularly considering that this is a relatively recent concept. I will make sure to add them.

Additionally, I agree that we should take a break for a bit and see how well-received the concept is before adding more. Currently, it's seen interest among members of the prominence community on groups.io - the individuals who initially developed the concept of topographic prominence. It's also seen public interest through Reddit posts discussing the concept, where many people have expressed interest in knowing more about the locations of such mountains in a particular region. However, I fully acknowledge that Wikipedia presents a unique environment and audience and I will be respectful of this. Gigitoe (talk) 06:14, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reasoned response and taking a break from the edits. I'm not so sure that Reddit would be considered a WP:RS. Cxbrx (talk) 13:58, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of On top of the world (topography) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article On top of the world (topography) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On top of the world (topography) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Imaginatorium (talk) 07:34, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 12:16, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:On-top-of-the-world mountain

Hello, Gigitoe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "On-top-of-the-world mountain".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]