- 1 The Signpost: 28 October 2018
- 2 You meant well, of course...
- 3 Special:Contributions/126.96.36.199
- 4 Andre Drummond semi
- 5 Vandalism
- 6 ArbCom 2018 election voter message
- 7 Page protection
- 8 size estimates
- 9 A question about an IP block
- 10 Hypernova's comments
- 11 Repeat offender
- 12 The Signpost: 1 December 2018
- 13 Reliable source?
- 14 Patton
- 15 Deletion of User talk page
- 16 A brownie for you!
- 17 Special:Contributions/2600:1003:B469:8E44:0:4D:B0E3:F201
- 18 Persistent vandal 188.8.131.52
The Signpost: 28 October 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
- News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
- In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
- Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
- Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
- Technology report: Bots galore!
- Special report: NPP needs you
- Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six
- In focus: Alexa
- Gallery: Out of this world!
- Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion
- Humour: Talk page humour
- Opinion: Strickland incident
- From the archives: The Gardner Interview
Regarding cleaning up sandbox
Respected Gilliam sir, I have written an article in the sandbox and moved it to the mainstream. But still, my sandbox shows the link. Can you guide me on how to clean up my sandbox space? So, that I can work on my new article without affecting the article which has been moved to the mainstream.--Maverickindian (talk) 10:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
You meant well, of course...
In Spacetime, user:Mariah100000 was a user account set up solely for performing vandalism. The anonymous IP, whom you reverted, was actually undoing Mariah's vandalism. See User talk:Mariah100000 to see repeated warnings given to Mariah.
Now I have to fix User:Purgy Purgatorio's fix. He always means well and often makes good points, but English is not his native language. (sigh) Prokaryotic Caspase Homolog (talk) 08:04, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed you just warned them so I thought that I'd tell you that it's a sock of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shingling334, fresh back from a block (see their block log, the block expired yesterday, and their behaviour makes it obvious it's still the same person using the IP...). Cheers, - Tom | Thomas.W talk 19:43, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Andre Drummond semi
Hello, I'm wondering if you would consider this user to be using his account merely for vandalism purposes? As you can see on this page, he appears to be here solely to vandalise Wikipedia pages. Do you agree with this sentiment, and if so, should he be banned? RussianAfroMan (talk) 22:51, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Dear Gillian, the information I added to the page about Pseudocyon was added because, on the internet, there are alot of accounts of Pseudocyon growing to these size, as this genus is very unknown, I know that any size estimate can be proven wrong.
http://www.prehistoric-wildlife.com/species/p/pseudocyon.html https://everipedia.org/wiki/lang_en/Pseudocyon/ plus other sources that may be considered unreliable.
Yours Sincerely, Wolfyx10. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 18:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
A question about an IP block
Hello, Gilliam. I am puzzled by an IP block that you placed. The IP address is 220.127.116.11, and the block log is here). When you placed the block there had been no edits from that IP address for 6 days, and the last edits which, as far as I can see, could possibly be regarded as vandalism or in any way abusive were just over a month before the block. Was the block a mistake? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:16, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for bringing this block to my attention. I can't explain why I blocked 18.104.22.168, and will unblock immediately. The block in question was placed in the same minute when I blocked another IP, so perhaps it was a glitch.– Gilliam (talk) 18:45, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Despite continual warnings and a recent block, User:22.214.171.124 continues with disruptive editing. In fact the account has never been used for anything other than vandalization. Would you please consider a much longer (if not indefinite) block? Sweetpool50 (talk) 20:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- I blocked for longer duration and added IP talk page to my watchlist.– Gilliam (talk) 20:05, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 December 2018
- From the editor: Time for a truce
- Special report: The Christmas wishlist
- Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
- Arbitration report: A long break ends
- Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
- Gallery: Intersections
- From the archives: Ars longa,vita brevis
On the page We Are The Normal I added this as a source. However the source looks more like a blog to me, and I only sdded it since I thought it was better than just keeping the page info totally unsourced. Can you check if this is a valid source?Ving Jol-ik (talk) 06:22, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- My guess is that avclub.com is an acceptable source. A google search reveals that many other Wikipedia articles cite it.– Gilliam (talk) 06:36, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks - wolf 18:29, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Deletion of User talk page
A brownie for you!
|sup bruh Coltonp738 (talk) 18:14, 12 December 2018 (UTC)|
- I mistook it for a vandalism-only account. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.– Gilliam (talk) 09:14, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Persistent vandal 126.96.36.199
Hi, Gilliam, I've checked every edit from the above account thru 2017-18 and there hasn't been one that wasn't disruptive vandalism. I notice on the talk page that there has been warning after warning since the account was created. Please consider an indefinite block and, if this is a school, check the whole range to see if there has been the same pattern of behaviour. Thanks, Sweetpool50 (talk) 13:45, 14 December 2018 (UTC)