User talk:Glaisher

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Glaisher, i want to know why you just deleted my page, it is an art and architecture project introduction, I am a new user, if it is not allowed to leave contact information, u can just delete the contact information, why you delete everything, pls give me a reason? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BambooCommune (talkcontribs) 08:45, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Glaisher, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Glaisher! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

A Question[edit]

Hello Glaisher, my name is Howicus. Aplolgies if this is a bit forward, but what inspired you to edit Wikipedia? I'm asking because I've been noticing a lot of editors like you recently, who create accounts and then start reverting a ton of vandalism by IPs. I was just wondering if there was some reason behind it, or if I'm just seeing patterns that were always there. Keep up the vandal fighting! Howicus (talk) 16:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Adam Mansbach[edit]

i'm going to revert your reversion. adding an infobox and isbn numbers to list of works is quite constructive. if you could be more specific as to what you thought was unconstructive, then we might have something to talk about. (talk) 17:40, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Great Answer[edit]

Great Answer Badge Great Answer Badge
Awarded to those who have given a great answer on the Teahouse Question Forum.

A good answer is one that fits in with the Teahouse expectations of proper conduct: polite, patient, simple, relies on explanations not links, and leaves a talkback notification.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Great Answer the one you gave to FGuerino
Miss Bono (zootalk) 17:59, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Miss Bono (zootalk) clearly beat me to this! However, here's my pasting of the badge, both, to show my appreciation and to actually practice your answer!
Great Answer Badge This user got the Great Answer Badge.
Earn one at: Teahouse Badges
My Best,
Frank --FGuerino (talk) 18:08, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks both of you, FGuerino & Miss Bono. --Glaisher (talk) 18:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you! Miss Bono (zootalk) 19:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Barrylb's page[edit]

Hello Glashier, Thanks for undoing that thing on Barrylb's page — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 06:42, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

If you won't stop this nonsense, you could get blocked. --Glaisher (talk) 06:45, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

I meant it sincerley, thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 06:47, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

User pages are not used for test edits and is usually only edited by the user themself. If you were assuming good faith I'm sorry if I have been harsh. --Glaisher (talk) 06:50, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Your request for rollback

Wikipedia Rollbacker.svg

Hi Glaisher. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! -- Mentifisto 00:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

People from the website: are mocking the book 1984 with a dead-horse joke about the upcoming Xbox One. They are being disruptive, not me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pooonme69 (talkcontribs) 11:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you!![edit]

For your help with my silly user page :) Miss Bono (zootalk) 17:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited YONAS (hip-hop artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

No Spam Barnstar Hires.png The No Spam Barnstar
Thanks for helping me revert the edits by that IP who was adding spam about a career website! GorillaWarfare (talk) 12:47, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! --Glaisher (talk) 12:56, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to STiki![edit]

Hello, Glaisher, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and -- t numbermaniac c 07:09, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

STiki logo.png


I reblocked this user as a spam-only account. They will not be posting any more ads under that account. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013[edit]

Information icon Hi Glaisher. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Ahmedabad Heart Hospital, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. I declined it because the basic information was there, though well concealed. I tidied the article, but have put a PROD on it. It may or may not be notable Fiddle Faddle 10:35, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Wow, that template looks heavy! Forts time I've used it! Fiddle Faddle 10:37, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
@User:Timtrent Meh. That wasn't me [1] --Glaisher [talk] 10:38, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
That has happened to me before. I am 100% sure it wasn't my finger trouble, but a wikiglitch! ~embarrassing~ in a way. Feel free to delete this lot! Fiddle Faddle 10:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Now I am less certain. I was certain once of certainty, but that has certainly changed. Fiddle Faddle 10:45, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Reg: KnowYourStar article deletion! == ==Speedy deletion nomination of KnowYourStar[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on KnowYourStar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Anjali Reddy J (talk) 05:23, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello Glaisher,

This is the website created by a group of engineers which features the interviews of the well known people in different fields which inspires the youth today. I have provided the external reference links also. Could you please guide me if anything needs to be done.

Thanks & Regards Anjali Reddy J — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anjali Reddy J (talkcontribs) 05:06, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Ailsapan[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User talk:Ailsapan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Glaisher [talk] 09:42, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your query as to whether my user page displays correctly now[edit]

YEEEESSSSSSSSSS! Thanks so much. (But how did you fix it?) Lawikitejana (talk) 12:59, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

As simple as that?! Wow. I'll have to look into that command/template when I'm not late for dinner at the folks' house. :) Thanks again! :) Lawikitejana (talk) 22:33, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

STiki emergency[edit]

Re: No need[edit]

See my edit summary. Graham87 13:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

CSD declined[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your vigilance. However, I'm just letting you know that I have declined your CSD on User talk:Creosma. We do not generally delete user talk pages. It is sufficient to simply remove any vandalism or spam, and warn the user if appropriate. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:52, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

@Kudpung. I remember tagging talk pages for deletion a lot and most of them are deleted . At least you could have blocked the user per {{Uw-softerblock}} or {{Uw-uhblock}}. --Glaisher [talk] 06:27, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Different admins have different ways of interpreting and/or implementing the policies and guidelines while some admins (regrettably) may not even be aware of all the 100s of guidelines and pmolicies. I cite a policy or a guideline when I do an action, give advice, or warn. Some admins are quicker than others on the block button - that's their freedom of choice, nothing here is graven in stone. I have that user on my watchlist and you can rest assured that if s/he breaches a policy again, I will most certainly take what I consider to be appropriate action. When you have gained a little more experience, you will appreciate these things. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:44, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
True. Different admins have different ways of interpreting or implementing policies. I don't mind about that. --Glaisher [talk] 06:50, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Ramin Cabbarli[edit]

Trophy.png Ramin Cabbarli
Hi! Why you are deleting my page? Please do not do it. I want enrich Wikipedia and love Ram5ninc (talk) 09:51, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:AlexanderBull[edit]

Hello Glaisher, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:AlexanderBull, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: It's just a new editor saying who they are. Delete the blog post link if you want, but if you do, say why you did it. . You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 13:15, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Shirt58, that account is an account used by a cross-wiki spambot. See m:NTSAMR. In fact, the account has been globally locked already. Special:CentralAuth/AlexanderBull. Regards, --Glaisher [talk] 15:41, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi again. My apologies - obvious mistake, completely my fault. Thank you for letting me know - I'll be more careful in future! Pete aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:11, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Niamh baker[edit]

Hello Glaisher, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I deleted Niamh baker, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow and specific, and the process is more effective if the correct criterion is used. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Coffee // have a cup // essay // 12:31, 2 November 2013 (UTC)


Hi Glaisher, we created a page by the name Discovery and development of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors. Now we have a article ready in sandbox and we want to publish it by the same name. How do we do that? 5 November 2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by ExtraChem (talkcontribs) 12:40, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

precisely when did I vandalize[edit]

You have no proof that I vandalized wikipedia. I was simply giving people awards to encourage them to edit!Banaster Giver Extra Polite (talk) 11:57, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

@Banaster Giver Extra Polite, Vandalism comes in all forms. Please stop trolling (= giving out barnstars in random). --Glaisher [talk] 11:58, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Random, more like selecting the most active people and then ENCOURAGING them.Banaster Giver Extra Polite (talk) 11:59, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
@User:Banaster Giver Extra Polite What about Special:Permalink/580884535 & Special:Permalink/580884545? And some people don't like it. [2] --Glaisher [talk] 12:04, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
That person simply archived the award to his barnstars page. [3]. Cheers. Collect (talk) 12:50, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. --Glaisher [talk] 16:43, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
I rewarded myself for giving the banasters. Plus, they even said than you (the ones that didn't like it).Anyway, only one per user.Banaster Giver Extra Polite (talk) 12:05, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:Banaster Giver Extra Polite. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Wikipedia:Vandalism is quite clear: "Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia." and "Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism." This is your only warning; if you continue to misuse vandalism warning templates, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:10, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Alright. Cool. --Glaisher [talk] 16:43, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
I sort of agree with the note, but I don't see why Guy Macon had to leave a template instead of a hand-typed note. We don't really do paper trails with warnings, unless there's real disruption. Carry on, Drmies (talk) 16:47, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Blargh --Glaisher [talk] 16:50, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
The Banaster Giver Extra Polite clearly failed the Duck Test would not have a list of established users right from first edit to give Barnstars and his been blocked indef for sock of TechnicalEngineerA3Further feel the Warning to Glaisher was uncalled for.He joined the Project in May 2013 and has been outstanding user.Feel it was wrong as WP:DTTR and feel it needs to be removed as WP:AGF.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:52, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Blargh^2. Nothing needs to be removed. I'm not new to Wikipedia. --Glaisher [talk] 16:56, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the Gander
Pharaoh, While I am sure that Glaisher is a fine human being and an outstanding Wikipedian (and I strongly suspect that he understood my good-natured nose tweaking above), the fact remains that he used a vandalism template in response to something that WP:VANDALISM specifically says is not vandalism, and he gave a final warning in a situation where an initial warning was appropriate. I agree that the barnstars are undesirable, but calling them vandalism when they clearly are not vandalism is not the answer. These are really minor issues not even worthy of a WP:TROUT, which is why I responded with the above "sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander" post. Lighten up, please. It's just a joke -- the kind of good-natured pseudocriticism that you often see among people who like and respect each other -- much like Template:Uw-dttr.
Also, if you read WP:DTTR and WP:TTR, you will see that the arguments in the TTR essay are far more compelling than the arguments in the DTTR essay. I have yet to see anyone read them both and conclude that the arguments in DTTR are better. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:26, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Oracle Technology Network may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * Blogs]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:22, 16 November 2013 (UTC)


Thanks for your recent comments. I believe you are saying that the edit-screen that I am seeing is different to that seen by someone else, since - as you observe - it would be bizarre, though not I feel un-Wikipedian, to thank oneself! If that is correct, I hadn't realised the techno-gearing was personalised to that degree. Derr?!!! Thanks. Protozoon (talk) 10:25, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Correct. --Glaisher [talk] 10:30, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

"Sexual Economy"[edit]

The sexual economy article is pretty obviously bunk, including sketchy sources. any mention of a 'sexual economy' is exclusively pulled from internet or internet-based sources, and no serious thinker has ever discussed or concieved of the idea. it is poorly thought out jargon for a small subset of an internet subgroup. no one links to the article and other complaints have been made about its' lack of varying, decent sources. why does it have a page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 15:17, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

You're beating me![edit]

Haha, this is more, or less, a "thank you" for watching the Recent Changes. I've been going to revert some vandalism, and a lot of the time, you've beat me to it. Darn you! (not really!)
- BitBus Talk 08:43, 21 November 2013 (UTC)


for [[4]] Robvanvee 17:02, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

New Page Patrol[edit]

Hi. Please note that we exercise some leeway before deleting high schools schools. Most school articles appear to be promotional when they are new and created by inexperienced users, but they can be cleaned up. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:57, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

CSD declined[edit]

Hi. I'm just letting you know I have declined your speedy deletion of User:Christianebeckwith. Although the user hasn't made any other edits yet, there is nothing in there that conflicts with user page policy. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:10, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

@Kudpung: See the section above. #Speedy deletion declined: User:AlexanderBull --Glaisher [talk] 09:04, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kathleen Supové (December 10)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Hi Arthur goes shopping. I am not the creator of that AfC. The only edits that I have in that page is closing the ref tags. Nothing else. --Glaisher [talk] 14:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
See this. John F. Lewis (talk) 14:57, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
A bug in that script? And thanks JL. --Glaisher [talk] 14:58, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
No. The script send the message to who is said to have requested review. That IP made you the requestee, therefore your 'AfC' got declined. John F. Lewis (talk) 15:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Not an IP. And it is an automated edit, I think. --Glaisher [talk] 15:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
How odd. Glaisher is correct on both counts, it was an automated edit, and I've never seen it do that before. User:Randy woolf should have been notified. Arthur, since you are the declining reviewer, would you please notify the correct person? Thanks! 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 15:50, 10 December 2013 (UTC)


ERROR: Please enter the username parameter when using the {{Talkback}} template - thus {{Talkback|<username>}}. Wisin y Yandel 1 (talk) 17:27, 16 March 2014 (UTC)


Thanks for this tip I found while cycling through the help desk. I might have stayed with editing last time if I had known about this facility or had asked about this problem. Nice to know there's recourse when attacked by edit-warriors. Learning something alllll the time. Manytexts (talk) 01:42, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]


For guidance through the edit jungle :)

Manytexts (talk) 01:44, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

OER inquiry[edit]

Hi Glaisher, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:41, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Kathleen Supové was accepted[edit]

Kathleen Supové, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

heather walls (talk) 08:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Interaction analyser[edit]

Thanks for the link at IRC. I was called away, and you'd gone by the time I got back. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)


Thank you for the link you provided. However, it says I have to "find" a certain line. I didn't even have a user script to find any line and I'm not familiar with stuff like that yet. I had to create User:Fitzcarmalan/vector.js then blanked it because I felt it was too risky. Thoughts? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 17:14, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

L'Damian Washington[edit]

I am re-reverting your edit. One of the two forms of the player's name, with a smart apostrophe or a dumb apostrophe, must be a redirect. We cannot have duplicate articles. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:16, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

@Robert McClenon: And it's a loop again. --Glaisher (talk) 15:20, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
I think it is finally fixed. Too many cooks. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:24, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

WP:JSTOR access[edit]

Hello, WP:The Wikipedia Library has record of you being approved for access to JSTOR through the TWL partnership described at WP:JSTOR . You should have recieved a Wikipedia email User:The Interior or User:Ocaasi sent several weeks ago with instructions for access, including a link to a form collecting information relevant to that access. Please find that email, and follow those instructions. If you were not approved, did not recieve the email, or are having some other concern or question, please respond to this message at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved. Thanks much, Sadads (talk) 21:14, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Note: You are recieving this message from an semi-automatically generated list. If you think you were incorrectly contacted, make sure to note that at Wikipedia talk:JSTOR/Approved.

hi, can you help[edit]

hi I noticed you once answered at the Village Pump, ( but recently, last 4 days, I haven't gotten anywhere there) , the "revision history statistics " link is down,its at "External tools" in page histories at the English Wikipedia for users with en or en-gb as language. It's made by and goes to I would fix or help fix it , I need it to see how the page edits and bytes added are going on the article I work on thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:29, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Ozzie10aaaa (talk · contribs) is referring to Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 132#revision history statistics; answers have been posted there and in the following section, Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 132#So.... --Redrose64 (talk) 17:38, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

TWA guide left bottom.png
Hi Glaisher! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 11:42, Tuesday, May 26, 2015 (UTC)

Get Help
About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

The Wikipedia Library needs you![edit]

Wikipedia Library owl.svg

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

  • Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
  • Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
  • Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
  • Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
  • Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
  • Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)