User talk:GnomeSweetGnome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Gnomeplacelikewiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! –Ammarpad (talk) 14:56, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Legend of Lucy Keyes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mystery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Frankenstein (1973 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Robert Gentry
Frankenstein (miniseries) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, GnomeSweetGnome. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Skin gambling[edit]

Alex is a known spammer who has been blocked multiple times for spamming his site. He changes references in articles to point towards his site. That is what happened here. He changed an existing source, which you then removed entirely. I then reverted it back to the original source. I've blocked Alex's account, it's just the latest in a series of self-promotion. -- ferret (talk) 14:45, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Jason's Song[edit]

Hi, i don't want to vandalize. But, it never was confirmed as a official fourth single from dw, neither from her or her label. a media calling it 'next single' doesen't mean anything. The same media called 'Everyday' the fourth single. Can we eventually do something about it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.253.246.35 (talk) 17:56, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

@79.253.246.35: There is a discussion on the talk page about this issue and the consensus was that it is a single and not a promotional single. If you disagree, that talk page is the place to take it up. GnomeSweetGnome (talk) 18:38, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Lumbee shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Note that I gave the other editor the same warning. Doug Weller talk 19:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

@Doug Weller: I just finished a WP:SOCK report (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Poprobeson) This person is a sock of an editor who has been blocked multiple times for this same behavior. GnomeSweetGnome (talk) 19:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks I think you’re right but I’m involved. Doug Weller talk 20:00, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Dreadlock Holiday[edit]

    • Please stop the edit war in the article about Dreadlock holiday**

If you want "research" you can listen to the song text. In the past wikipedia was written mostly by IPs. Now a group of users like you and crap bots revert anything that is done by an IP. Actually you will be a part of a research article Im writnig - how everything is reverted on wikipedia if someone posts from an IP. If you are a decent human being, you should listen to the song and revert your deletionist revert. I dont think this will happen, people like you think they are always right though - I bet you reverted without listening to the actual song. Because someone using an IP "dared" to revert a bot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.64.1.194 (talk) 13:15, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Listening to the song as evidence is original research. Information needs to be verifiable using reliable sources independent of the subject itself. Whether you are using an IP or a user account has no bearing on unreferenced original research being reverted. GnomeSweetGnome (talk) 13:21, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

It as an additional information for the stakeholders, not copy righted material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donna.schlueter (talkcontribs) 09:17, 21 December 2017 (UTC)