User talk:Gog the Mild

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Blitz[edit]

Hello. Just out of curiosity, was thanking me for that edit meant sincerely or sarcastically? It is a little difficult to tell the tone of voice from a little click! Best wishes DBaK (talk) 19:23, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Ah, good question. Hi. It was sincere. A minor civility if you like; but also a genuine appreciation. Yes, I can see how a different tone of click would have implied sarcasm - I shall have to watch that. And likewise to yourself. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:41, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
My first real message. I may make it as a Wikipedian yet :-) [citation needed] . Gog the Mild (talk) 19:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
HA! Yes indeed. And thanks - I like sincerity. I am cheesed off over what happened there but I'm glad you were being nice about it rather than poking me with a stick. Cheers and happy editing! DBaK (talk) 19:50, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
PS Your talk page [?] gave me a laugh. A pendant after my own heart. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 :) DBaK (talk) 20:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

My Way (2011 film)[edit]

If you get a chance see My Way (2011 film)--Woogie10w (talk) 00:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

@Woogie10w: Ha ha. You are well ahead of me. I only had the story from a slightly suspect Ambrose reference. I suppose that it was asking for the 'Hollywood treatment'. Definitely on my must watch list. Thank you.

Your GA nomination of Operation Pedestal[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Operation Pedestal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 00:40, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open![edit]

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Operation Pedestal[edit]

The article Operation Pedestal you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Operation Pedestal for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 17:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

G'day, Gog, I'm back from my short vacation now and am ready to finalise the review of the Operation Pedestal article. I can see that a couple of editors, mainly Keith, have done quite a bit of work on it; however, there are still many points remaining unaddressed in the review. Just so that you know, if they have not been addressed three days from now I intend to close the review as unsuccessful. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:01, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for the barnstar, much appreciated. Urselius (talk) 08:54, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Operation Pedestal[edit]

The article Operation Pedestal you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Operation Pedestal for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 22:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 18 September[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)