User talk:Gokulchandola
Welcome[edit]
Hello, Gokulchandola, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
Gokul Chandola[edit]
|
Gokul Chandola |
| Hallo, Gokulchandola (talk) 11:01, 3 January 2012 (UTC) |
Barnstar[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For creating the artcle of Ashok Khemka --sarvajna (talk) 13:13, 16 October 2012 (UTC) |
Hi, do you want to nominate the article in the DYK section? —Vensatry (Ping me) 06:48, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Durga Shakti Nagpal[edit]
Hello! As you are one of the main contributors of the article Durga Shakti Nagpal, i am here to inform you that the article is now nominated for WP:DYK. The nomination can be found at Template:Did you know nominations/Durga Shakti Nagpal. Although it doesn't necessarily have a good chance of passing, for numerous reasons, i wish you good luck with it. Please try and address any issues that are raised there by reviewers. I and many others will also keep an eye on it and provide help. Good Luck and Good Job! Feel free to contact us. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:33, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
A bowl of strawberries for you![edit]
|
For edits in the article of Durga Shakti Nagpal -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 07:17, 7 August 2013 (UTC) |
DYK for Durga Shakti Nagpal[edit]
 | On 20 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Durga Shakti Nagpal, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Durga Shakti Nagpal was suspended by the Uttar Pradesh government for demolishing an allegedly illegal wall of a mosque? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Durga Shakti Nagpal. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Your GA nomination of Indian Space Research Organisation[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Indian Space Research Organisation you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 11:00, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Indian Space Research Organisation[edit]
The article Indian Space Research Organisation you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Indian Space Research Organisation for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 (talk) 05:42, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Deletions[edit]
Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because
- it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines.
- it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: one of the top business schools in the India
- it's all about what the institute offers, little about the institute itself other than locations. How many students? lecturers? I would have thought this was basic information for an educational body
- You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
- I deleted your other institute too. The claim to be a top school was referenced to a site that could be edited by the institute, and th content was just a list of courses that were on offer, nothing factual about the institute
Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:29, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- I should point out that if you just want the deleted text to improve, I can put in a sandbox for you. If you are challenging whether the article should have been deleted as it stood, that's obviously a matter for the Deletion Review Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:02, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Your request for undeletion[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management & Technology. JohnCD (talk) 21:46, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- I have reviewed your REFUND request, but the article is not suitable for restoration. Instead, I have "userfied" it to User:Gokulchandola/Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management & Technology where you can work on it. Jimfbleak has given you good advice about improving the article: I will add a little more.
- Read WP:Your first article
- Notice the need to provide references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability
- Do not use promotional language like "one of the top business schools"
- When it is ready, click on the link "Submit the page!" in the box at the top. That will send it to WP:Articles for creation, where an experienced user will look at it and either accept it or give you feedback. JohnCD (talk) 21:59, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Yogendra Yadav[edit]
I have reverted you at Yogendra Yadav. The source that you were using does indeed say some things but it didn't support any of the tagged statements that you removed in favour of it. If something is not in a source then your choices are to amend the statement to suit the source or leave the tag in situ and trust that someone else can resolve the issue. What you did amounted to "fake referencing". Please do not do this again. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 19:08, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Durga Shakti Nagpal[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Durga Shakti Nagpal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 08:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Wikilinking[edit]
Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:
- dates
- years
- commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
- common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).
Thanks and my best wishes.
Tony (talk) 07:59, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
A page you started (M.Y.S. Prasad) has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating M.Y.S. Prasad, Gokulchandola!
Wikipedia editor Slashme just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hi there! I found your article on MYS Prasad while doing New Page reviews. I'm not sure whether he meets the notability criteria for academics, so I put a tag at the top of the article. See Wikipedia:Notability_(academics).
To reply, leave a comment on Slashme's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Writer's Barnstar |
| For your dedication to Wikipedia, and for all the articles you have created! Anir1uph | talk | contrib 17:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC) |
[edit]
Yes Naveen JaiHind is received significant coverage in Haryana newspapers now a days. He is newly joined politics that's why not much details or record on his name. Please don't delete this page. You can suggest what should be updated in this page.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by NaveenJaihind (talk • contribs) 13:00, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Ways to improve Haryana legislative assembly election, 2005[edit]
Hi, I'm Nechlison. Gokulchandola, thanks for creating Haryana legislative assembly election, 2005!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Try to resolve your issues in the article
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Nechlison (talk) 12:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
In case you're not aware of this —Vensatry (Ping) 04:07, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Delhi Legislative Assembly election, 2014[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Delhi Legislative Assembly election, 2014, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shyamsunder (talk) 22:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Durga Shakti Nagpal[edit]
The article Durga Shakti Nagpal you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Durga Shakti Nagpal for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of North8000 -- North8000 (talk) 19:51, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sam Manekshaw[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sam Manekshaw you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dana boomer -- Dana boomer (talk) 19:00, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sam Manekshaw[edit]
The article Sam Manekshaw you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sam Manekshaw for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dana boomer -- Dana boomer (talk) 19:21, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of B Janardhan Reddy[edit]
Hello Gokulchandola,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged B Janardhan Reddy for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Dudel250 (talk) 04:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Indian police officers suicide for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian police officers suicide until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Philg88 ♦talk 15:04, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| hey could you please review the page Mister World India and Indian Princess. Sky Groove (talk) 14:41, 17 June 2014 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| hey could you please review the page Mister World India and Indian Princess. Sky Groove (talk) 14:43, 17 June 2014 (UTC) |
Nomination of Paras Hospitals for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paras Hospitals until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shyamsunder (talk) 12:58, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Request[edit]
I request you to improve the article Corruption in Haryana and thanks for giving your suggestion to keep it.Rajsector3 (talk) 16:50, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Tanu Sharma for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanu Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — LeoFrank Talk 03:49, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
The tone of the content is just not suitable for an encyclopedia. You need to stop reverting. I see that you fail to understand how things work here. In none of your arguments against deletion, you have given a valid reason not to delete. As mentioned in one of them, please see WP:ATA. You also need to stop soapboxing on Tanu Sharma. — LeoFrank Talk 05:11, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014[edit]
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Per WP:BRD, you should stop reverting! I will report you if you continue — LeoFrank Talk 05:15, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tanu Sharma, you may be blocked from editing. — LeoFrank Talk 05:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
ANI[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Sitush (talk) 06:34, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Parashospitals1.jpg[edit]
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:53, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Rajkumar Sthabathy[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Rajkumar Sthabathy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 16:39, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Gokulchandola![edit]
Hello, Gokulchandola. I'm a graduate student from the University of Washington, and I wanted to ask you some questions about your Wikipedia work. Any chance we could chat or message? I'd like to ask you a number of questions, and so I don't think your Talk page is probably the best. If so, I can send you my university e-mail address. Qaclark (talk) 07:39, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Avbil logo.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Avbil logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Ggps logo.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ggps logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:57, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Medanta logo.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Medanta logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:11, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:News nation logo.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:News nation logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:17, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Poorvi Bhatt[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Poorvi Bhatt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fazzo29 (talk) 10:13, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Poorvi Bhatt[edit]
The article Poorvi Bhatt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not meet notability criteria of WP:NTENNIS: Not in top 3 of junior ITF rankings or won a junior grand slam.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fazzo29 (talk) 15:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Poorvi Bhatt for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poorvi Bhatt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fazzo29 (talk) 09:43, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
The article Karunuday Singh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. John from Idegon (talk) 07:04, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Karunuday Singh for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karunuday Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:00, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Sanjay Singh.jpg listed for discussion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sanjay Singh.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:44, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C K Anil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uncletomwood (talk) 08:54, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Vivek Yadav, IAS[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Vivek Yadav, IAS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Peridon (talk) 16:12, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of H. Rajesh Prasad for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H. Rajesh Prasad until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uncletomwood (talk) 09:28, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Vivek Yadav (civil servant) for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek Yadav (civil servant) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uncletomwood (talk) 09:31, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of S. K. Srivastava[edit]
The article S. K. Srivastava has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-Notable Civil Servant
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Uncletomwood (talk) 17:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Rajesh Verma (journalist)[edit]
The article Rajesh Verma (journalist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:45, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Gokulchandola. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Prithviraj Jindal[edit]
The article Prithviraj Jindal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Notability not demonstrated
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic London 18:17, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Re-initiating INCOTM[edit]
It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Re-initiating INCOTM[edit]
It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Invitation to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Indian military history[edit]
You are invited to join the Indian military history work-group, an initiative of the Military history WikiProject. This group is to exclusively deal with the topics related to Indian military. If you're interested, please add you name to the participants list. Ignore if you are already a member. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Indian defence services[edit]
You are requested to participate in the discussion of Wiki Loves Indian defence services on the talk page of WikiProject India. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
The article Abhay Kumar Dubey has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Luis150902 (talk | contribs) 20:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Sajay Singh.jpg listed for discussion[edit]
September 2017[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Gurgaon, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. In addition to original research concerns, please review your edits for composition, spelling, and grammar prior to submission. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:01, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Gokulchandola. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India)[edit]
Greetings,
It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Supporting Indian Wikipedia Program resource distribution[edit]
In 2017 - 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India chapter (WMIN) and user groups will pilot a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program (Code name: Project Tiger) will:
- (a) Support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and
- (b) Sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.
The objective of the program is to provide laptops and internet stipends for existing editors who need support to contribute more actively. 50 basic model Acer Chromebooks and Internet stipends for 100 contributors are available for distribution. Provided resources are the sole property of the beneficiaries and should be used for the betterment of the movement.
If you're an active Wikimedian, and interested to receive support from this project, please apply. It will take around 10 minutes of your time, and will ask descriptive questions about your contribution to Indic Wikimedia projects.
- Apply at: Supporting Indian Language Wikipedias Program#Apply for support
- Last date for submitting applications is 11th February 2018, 11:59 IST.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Nainitalbank.gif[edit]
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Project Tiger Writing Contest[edit]
In 2017 – 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India Chapter (WMIN) and user groups from India, are piloting a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program will (a) support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and (b) sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.
Phase (a) has been completed, during which active contributors were awarded laptops and internet stipends. Phase (b) will be a contest in which editors will come together and develop a writing contest focused on content gaps. Each month three individual prizes will be awarded to each community based on their contribution for the month. The prizes worth 3,000 INR, 2000 INR, and 1,000 INR, will be awarded to the top contributors for each month. The contest started at March 1, 2018, 0:00, and will end at May 31, 2018, 23:59 (IST). Useful links are as follows:
- Sign up at: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest/Participants
- List of the articles can be referred at: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest/Topics
- Submit/report your articles/contributions at: https://tools.wmflabs.org/fountain/editathons/project-tiger-2018-en
- For more details, rules, FAQ etc. kindly refer: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest
Looking forward your participation, all the best. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) at 22:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC).
Access for Sonalika Group Page[edit]
Dear GokulChandola,
This side Akshay Goel from Sonalika Tractors, Noida office. This was in regarding the page created by you for Sonalika group. Requesting you to please share the contact details with us so that we can reach to you for the necessary updates.
Regards,
Akshay Goel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshaygoel1 (talk • contribs) 06:07, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Gokulchandola. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject India[edit]
Namaste, Gokulchandola. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/India-related articles#Legislative Assembly constituency names. Italawar (talk) 14:12, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge[edit]
|
|
Hello Gokulchandola. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: {{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}}
Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC) |
Nomination of Akhilesh Chaturvedi for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhilesh Chaturvedi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Palmsandbeaches (talk) 04:43, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Category:Recipients of the Lal Bahadur Shastri National Award has been nominated for listification[edit]
Nomination of Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management and Technology for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management and Technology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The article Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Private school with no claim to notability. Prose reads like a brochure.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:17, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:LBSIM logo.jpg[edit]
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
You have been pruned from the Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members list.[edit]
Hi Gokulchandola! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 year.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Members.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Govt Polytechnic Nainital.jpg[edit]
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kiitlogo.gif[edit]
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Medanta logo.jpg[edit]
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Net4logo.jpg[edit]
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Rotarylogo.jpg[edit]
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Bride of the World for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bride of the World (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Net4 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The article Government Polytechnic Takula has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:MILL institution. Fails WP:NSCHOOL.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:56, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medanta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Nomination of Hardeo Singh for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hardeo Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.