User talk:gracefool

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
User talk

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ (song) listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ (song). Since you had some involvement with the ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ (song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Anarchyte 09:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, I've participated. ··gracefool💬 20:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Decompression sickness[edit]

Two things:

  1. Section links in most browsers are case-sensitive, so if you want to link to Decompression practice #Decompression tables, then making a link to Decompression practice #decompression tables does not "link it to the right place". Try clicking them to see.
  2. There is a existing redirect which already points Dive tables to Decompression practice #Decompression tables. Wikipedia prefers redirects to piped links for multiple reasons, not least of which is keeping the wikitext readable; MOS:REDIR explains other reasons.

I've reverted your latest, incorrect edit. --RexxS (talk) 17:13, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, I wasn't aware of that. The MOS has changed, it used to recommend not linking to redirects. That's what happens when I don't read it in 12 years :p ··gracefool 💬 23:06, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Itenerary listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Itenerary. Since you had some involvement with the Itenerary redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Itenery listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Itenery. Since you had some involvement with the Itenery redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Itinery listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Itinery. Since you had some involvement with the Itinery redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:16, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Itinirary listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Itinirary. Since you had some involvement with the Itinirary redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:16, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Parkour[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Parkour you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 02:00, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Parkour[edit]

The article Parkour you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Parkour for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 02:40, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

BracketBot: Parkour[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Parkour may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • org/projects/leave-no-trace/ |archivedate=29 September 2012 |accessdate=18 April 2016)}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Without a Trace |work=Vertical Floor Magazine |author=Tenedra
  • date=9 July 2006|work=[[The Times]]|accessdate=3 January 2008|location=London}}</ref> ''[[Run (film|Run]]'' (2013),<ref>{{cite web |title=Run (2013) |work=IMDb |url=http://www.imdb.com/title/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:32, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Nice! Thanked. ··gracefool 💬 21:33, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Parkour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Run (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Editor of the Week : nominations needed![edit]

The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!

Sent on behalf of Buster Seven Talk for the Editor of the Week initiative by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Parkour[edit]

The article Parkour you nominated as a good article has failed Symbol oppose vote.svg; see Talk:Parkour for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 12:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Twinjet for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Twinjet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twinjet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Timothy Robinson12345 (talk) 15:45, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Gracefool. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Gracefool. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WI listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:WI. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:WI redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:16, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC[edit]

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13Talk 16:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Editor of the Week seeking nominations (and a new facilitator)[edit]

The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!

In addition, the WikiProject is seeking a new facilitator/coordinator to handle the logistics of the award. Please contact L235 if you are interested in helping with the logistics of running the award in any capacity. Remove your name from here to unsubscribe from further EotW-related messages. Thanks, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

List of years in computer games[edit]

@Gracefool: Article was renominated for deletion. Since you have contributed to this first nomination of the article, I want you to be aware of this deletion and to weigh in on the decision again. Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 16:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I have commented. ··gracefool 💬 05:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Good to find you[edit]

I just read your user page, and was such a pleasant experience that I thought I'd say thank you. Widefox; talk 12:59, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Thankyou very much :) ··gracefool 💬 03:16, 20 April 2017 (UTC)