User talk:GranReserva7

October 2009

Reversion of edits to Leslie Cochran

Thanks for your comment and query on my talk page. In response, disclaimers really aren't necessary or appropriate. Contributions simply need to comply with Wikipedia policies. Here are some of the related Wikipedia articles that explain the issues I saw with the section that I removed:

• WP:PRIMARY - "Wikipedia articles should rely mainly on published reliable secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources."
• WP:NPOV - "All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view, representing fairly, and as far as possible without bias, all significant views that have been published by reliable sources."
• WP:ELNO - "[Avoid direct links] to documents that require external applications (such as Flash or Java) to view the relevant content, unless the article is about such rich media."
• Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons - "Editors must take particular care adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page. Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity, and must adhere strictly to all applicable laws in the United States and to all of our content policies, especially:

• Neutral point of view (NPOV)
• Verifiability
• No original research"

The Wikipedia:Five_pillars article and the "Wikipedia Policy" box to the right of this response might provide a helpful overview and introduction. —Danorton (talk) 21:08, 16 October 2009 (UTC)