User talk:Green Tory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Green Tory, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! HamburgerRadio (talk) 04:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Its completely misleading to say that vote-splitting contribute to the Conservative Victory - there is no evidence that vote-splitting actually contribute to any defeat or victories. You have 2 left wing party with NDP majority in Manitoba and one 1 conservative party as official opposition You have similar situations with other provinces such as B.C and Ontario and couple other

CPC is conservatisim, not liberal conservatism - ask any member of CPC and they describe themselves as conservative. Hence the name - Conservative Party of Canada

December 2009[edit]

Information.svg Please do not edit articles based on your own personal analysis of issues. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Furthermore, all of your edits involve a particular political party, which (when combined with your chosen user name) may indicate potential POV and conflict of interest issues. Thank you. Ckatzchatspy 01:44, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

I didn't "add" anything persay

Conservative Party of Canada[edit]

You're going back and forth with reversions over "Liberal Conservatism". It's time to discuss it on the talk page. TheFeds 03:12, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Liberal conservatism is part of conservatism

Conservatism consist of a sphere of the following 1) Conservative liberalism 2) Liberal conservatism 3) Libertarian conservatism 4) Paleoconservatism 5) Red/Blue Tory 6) Passionate Conservatism 7) Neoliberalism.

By calling it other then "Conservatism" you are implying that conservatism liberal is worth more then libertarian conservative. Conservatism consist of all ideas related to conservatism

You are violating wikipedia protocol by changing what has already been done. Leave it alone and stop confusing people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Green Tory (talkcontribs) 04:15, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

That's exactly the discussion you might want to have on the article's talk page (linked previously). (See also WP:3RR for reasons why it's a bad idea to continually revert changes without discussion.)
On the other hand, you do seem to be applying a consistent practice to other political-party-related articles. Given your username, and your several edits to the Conservative Party article, it initially appeared that you might be attempting to promote some sort of ideological bias. As long as you don't appear to be pushing a political agenda, you're probably fine—but you're going to attract others' attention if you don't discuss potentially controversial changes. TheFeds 04:46, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Don't remove[edit]

Don't remove the Socialist WikiProject banner on the NDP talk page again.. If you didn't know, social democracy is a socialist ideology. So don't remove. --TIAYN (talk) 20:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)