Page semi-protected

User talk:GregJackP

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

Precious four years!

Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg
Four years!

Miss you, sense of fairness and Wurst! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Looks like some fairness and wurst return? Great! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:42, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Miss you

I appreciate all that you've done to stand up for editors who are harassed.

Best Regards,
Barbara (WVS)   20:26, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Edit war warning

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Plummer v. State shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 18:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 18:41, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

AN/I notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. QuackGuru (talk) 22:59, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

@QuackGuru: If I have not told you before, stay off of my talk page. GregJackP Boomer! 00:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

ANI notice 2

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Jytdog (talk) 05:37, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Peer review

Any chance you could look in here? No doubt you remember the case.--Wehwalt (talk) 06:16, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Sure, be happy to do so. LOL, reminds me of an ATL Law Revue video (here)... GregJackP Boomer! 14:19, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
The furniture in the lounge at the beginning is apparently unchanged from when I was a law student there, lo these many years. Very funny, thanks.--Wehwalt (talk) 02:38, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Triple Crown Nomination

Hi there. Thanks for adding your nomination for the Imperial Napoleonic Triple Crown to Wikipedia:Triple Crown/Nominations. Just letting you know, your nomination is likely to be processed much sooner if you add links to at least support your DYKs, as searching for this information manually can be quite time consuming. Here's an example of someone else who has done this, in case you don't understand what I mean: [1]. It's also helpful to add links to support your GAs and Featured content as well, though its much less time consuming to search for evidence that you contributed to this type of content than it is for DYKs. Have a nice day. Freikorp (talk) 09:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

OK, I'll get on that. It may take a bit to get all of the links. GregJackP Boomer! 14:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC)