User talk:Grifterlake
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Hi, I see that you have posted your e-mail address on your user page. Generally, this is not a good idea as it is very public and will attract spam and other undesirable responses. However, you can enter your e-mail address in your profile (under "my preferences" at the top of the page when you are logged in). if you also check the "enable e-mails from other users" box, other editors will be able to e-mail you through Wikipedia, but you will not reveal your e-mail address to them unless you reply through e-mail. SpinningSpark 13:42, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll move it to the preference page. It's not much of a profile as of yet, but that should change. Grifterlake (talk) 19:40, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
August 2009[edit]
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Article. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:51, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Canvasing[edit]
I see that for the AfD on Hank Skinner, you were posting messages to specific people asking them to add their comments if they want to save the article. While your enthusiasm for the article is understandable, trying to influence the outcome of an AfD in this manner is considered inappropriate. See WP:CANVAS for an explanation on why. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 22:53, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Hank Skinner, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:28, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Lake Worth Monster[edit]
Why not mention it in Cryptids article, then?--Mr Fink (talk) 16:36, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Off day[edit]
- ) Natty10000 | Natter 02:43, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
sources and edits[edit]
hello, since you have interest in this article, and there's an attempt to hide a sourced paragraph, because of an assertion that it was so "discredited" simply because the father has convenient memory problems with no real proof that the newspaper in question is definitely lying, there needs to be some input by interested parties. I'm kind of busy to be wrangling forever on this matter, so your views and arguments are requested and appreciated. I only ask because you show expertise and interest in the article so therefore is NOT really "canvasing". Anyway, read through the comments and arguments in the new sub-section that was created, and give your take, if you can. Click here. Thanks. Redzemp (talk) 17:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Your statements on Muslims[edit]
You stated: If belief that the Quran is the Word of Allah, as given to Muhammad and the belief that Jesus Christ is the Messiah and savior for all are not the fundamental tenets of Islam and Christianity, respectively, then what are?
They are the beliefs of some Muslims and Christians. There exist many sects of religions and many degrees of faith. For example, only 40% of U.S. Christians believe you must accept Christ as your personal savior. The majority of Catholics disagree with many important church teachings. In your edits you claim to know the motivations of Muslims based on what you believe all Muslims believe. This is prejudice, pure and simple. An encyclopedia is based on reliable sources. Not your opinions based on how entire classes of people think. I should also add that Muslims and Christians worship the same god -- the god of Abraham. They are both Abrahamic religions. Please keep your personal beliefs out of your edits. Objective3000 (talk) 14:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
article review and edit....[edit]
hi. You may want to check out new article that I just created, even though I did not really want to. The only reason that I did was because I was searching for it on Wikipedia, and I couldn't find anything on it so far. And I almost couldn't believe there was no actual article (from what I could see) on this matter. The Philadelphia shooting on the police. "In the name of Islam". Anyway, if you want to help out on it, and contribute, or review, etc, please click: January 2016 shooting of Philadelphia PD. Thanks. Redzemp (talk) 01:27, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Grifterlake. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Grifterlake. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Grifterlake. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |