User talk:Gulielmi2002

Welcome!

Hello Gulielmi2002, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

In Wikipedia, new Users do not automatically receive a welcome; not even a machine-generated welcome. Welcome messages come from other Users. They are personal and genuine. They contain an offer of assistance if such assistance is ever desired.

I suggest to everyone I welcome that they may find some of the following helpful — there’s nothing personal in my suggestion and you may not need any of them:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Dolphin51 (talk) 22:03, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Chevrolet small-block engine‎ →3.670 in bore family (1975-1998)[edit]

Hello!

I hope the new year finds you and yours in good spirits!

You are correct that the application is important enough to keep. I removed the reference from the summary portion of the 3.670 in bore family for the following reasons:

In terms of the large quantity of 3.670 bore blocks produced from 1975-1998, the one year, one model, California-only application represents a very small percentage.
It appears in the 305 detail section bulleted list "1980 Chevrolet Corvette (California only)".

I should have moved the reference to the summary paragraph under the 305. In my opinion it serves the purpose better than in the overall paragraph leading in to all the 3.670 in bore family variants.

Would you be comfortable moving this reference to the summary paragraph of the 305?

Thanks for your time!

Toneron2 (talk) 20:14, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LT5 and Northstar[edit]

Please see the talk page of the article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Toneron2 (talk • contribs) 02:42, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Major crackpot at Buoyancy[edit]

Hello! I see you are part of the fluid dynamics team at Wikipedia. Some have posted a long, nonsensical Atwood machine analogy for hydrodynamic buoyancy, that is only supported by a crackpot site. I'm sending this message to each member at the fluid dynamics team.Arildnordby (talk) 07:02, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]