User talk:Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Szwedowski de Korwin, a Polonia family in Uruguay[edit]

Polish nobility today[edit]


“In 1921, the first Constitution of the Polish Republic after World War I finally terminated all privileges of nobility and forbade the usage of arms (Article 96). The later Constitution of 1935 (Article 81, §2) cancelled this paragraph, so de facto this meant the restitution of some old laws regarding the use of arms and honorary titles. However, the privileges were cancelled by another paragraph of the same Constitution which says that all citizens are equal by law. Such situation remains to this today.” - Piotr Pawel Bajer - Published: July 26th, 2000. [1]

Countries where I lived for a time[edit]

Countries where I lived for a time
USA Québec Argentina Brasil Colombia Venezuela

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:26, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Could you consider adding this template to your userpage? It is very helpful in case translators are needed and such.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:13, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the names of your family do not constitute articles and i am deleting them on sight. jimfbleak 06:52, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you'd like to comment on / use this template.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:08, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What characters are wrong? Where?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 05:55, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sanguszko[edit]

Dear Piotrus: Why Andrey (Ghirlandajo) sais so taxative: (I quote) Like other princely houses of Poland, its origin has been considered murky? Gustav Korwin-Szwedowski 02:59, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is it a question for me? If so, you should leave it on my talk page.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 21:43, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps it's a question better asked of him directly?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 21:09, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When you create new Poland-related articles, please drop us a note on that page, so we can see how Poland-related database on Wiki is growing. Tnx! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 21:43, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's easy: just go to the relevant section, and link the article you have created from there.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 21:09, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gustavo_Korwin_Szwedowski[edit]

I'd assume that Gustavo_Korwin_Szwedowski (talk · contribs) is you?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:49, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You needed help?[edit]

I was told you needed some help. What can I do for you? Pepsidrinka 02:42, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your query[edit]

Because there are no authentic records of the Lithuanian nobility in the 14th and 15th centuries, which makes true origin of princely families extremely difficult to unravel. The early Gediminid genealogy is a mess, while the origin of the non-Gediminids (like the Glinski, Holszanski, Sapiehas, or Radziwills) is even more difficult to ascertain. --Ghirla -трёп- 09:57, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you find some information on him (husband of Zuzanna Korwin Gosiewska). As I explain on the talk of his article, there is some confusion about his offices.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 22:29, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saints Wikiproject[edit]

I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints.

You are invited to participate in Saints WikiProject, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about saints. We are currently discussing prospects for the project. Your input would be greatly appreciated!

I also invite you to join the discussion on prayers and infoboxes here: Prayers_are_NPOV.

Thanks! --evrik 17:33, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wiadomo, że Henryk Dobrzański poległ pod Anielinem na "skutek zdrady", jak napisano w komunikacie podpisanym przez jego zastępcę porucznika Marka Szymańskiego pseudonim "Sęp" i adiutanta Henryka Ossowskiego pseudonim "Dołęga". Pochowano go w tajemnicy; wbrew utrzymującej się długo pogłosce - nie miał pogrzebu z honorami. Miejsce jego spoczynku, mimo intensywnych poszukiwań, nadal jest nieznane.

Sorry I don't speak Polish? What's the connection with Dołęga-Ossowski and who is Henryk Dołęga-Ossowski?

Thanks

--jemthepen ,19 May 2006

Wiki polaca[edit]

Gracias por tu comentario. Aparentemente mi castellano ya no es tan fluente como antes... perdoname por lo que hago con la lengua de Cervantes... ;)
En cuanto a tu mensaje a Polimerek, se lo he enviado directo, con una pregunta por los motivos de bloqueacion. En mi opinion el problema fue que desde hace unos cien anos la gente en Polonia ya no use escudos ni blasones, y a la mayoria de la gente anadirlos a articulos sobre personajes modernos parece muy, muy extrano. Pero por otro lado la decision de Polimerek me parece aun mas extrana; aparentemente te ha bloqueado sin cualquier voto. Por esto le pregunte por sus motivos y espero que nos envie su respuesta tan pronto como posible.
Porsupuesto le he enviado tu mensaje a Bocianski tambien, pero creo que esto ya no necesita ningun comentario de mi lado.
Los dos comentarios se los puede ver en aqui y aqui.
En cuanto a los blasones en "3D" - crearlos es bastante simple, especialmente con las herramientas del Projet:Blasons de la wiki francesa :) //Halibutt 22:45, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Gracias. En cuanto al comentario de Jakub H, te pide que no anades enlaces a otras versiones de wikipedia como enlaces externos. Para esto normalmente se usa los enlaces de tipo interwiki (p.ej. en Wieniawa (herb szlachecki) deberias anadir un enlace a [[en:Wieniawa Coat of Arms]] y no a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wieniawa_Coat_of_Arms Wieniawa Coat of Arms]. Saludos.
//Halibutt 09:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections to your user page[edit]

I took the liberty of making some minor edits to your English grammar — pronouns whose gender did not match the antecedent, etc. — capitalization, and punctuation . If you object, I apologize; it is very easy to revert. Please correct my Spanish if you notice any errors on the Spanish Wikipedia! --Jpbrenna 22:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No hay de qué --Jpbrenna 01:14, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted HA[edit]

I have deleted the page - I hope this is what you wanted. Saludos :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 05:22, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The licence looks ok, what is missing is the source. Can you add the source - i.e. link to the website you copied the picture from?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:32, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you elaborate on your last msg? There is no such image (K2).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:20, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The images look fine to me and are in correct article. They are all on Wikipedia Commons, and I think Commons is multilingual and there should be help pages in Spanish, too.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:06, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to PL wikt[edit]

Hi. I invite you to Polish Wiktionary because I see that you know a lot of languages (also Polish)./Cze. Zapraszam Cię do polskiego Wikisłownika, ponieważ widzę, że znasz dużo języków (w tym także polski). Mógłbyś zostać np. ekspertem od hiszpańskiego. Pietras1988 TALK 10:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Juliusz Slowacki.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Juliusz Slowacki.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:01, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zionism = Racism[edit]

Please do not make similar changes to the article Zionism again. I have reverted your edit. From someone purporting to be a professor of history, I would expect a slightly higher level of editing. Also, please do not again make such controversial changes with the 'minor edit' button. This is a clear violation of Wikipedia guidelines. --Daniel575 | (talk) 08:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Categories are handled via WP:CFD. If there is a specific empty category that you'd like me to delete, please give me a link to it (like Category:Poland), otherwise people at WP:CFD are better experts in that area.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  02:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  18:32, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Hello Gustavo, thank you for your contributions related to Polish nobility. However, would you please familiarize yourself with the category namespace? Categories shouldn't have a lot of text (usually none at all), or links to articles that appear (or should appear) in the categories, or images; all of this just gets in the way. Also, categories should be properly indexed. I have tried to fix this in some of the categories you've worked on, but I've noticed that recently you've been reverting me. Appleseed (Talk) 05:58, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've made some updates (including indexing and categorization) to some of the categories you've worked on. They should be ok now. Happy editing. Appleseed (Talk) 00:03, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Gustavo, what you were referring to is called a template. As for your second question ("It is me again"), I'm not sure I follow. Appleseed (Talk) 20:56, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I see what you mean. That's actually not a problem with the categories, it's an issue of too many articles in "Category:Polish nobility". The solution is to remove "Category:Polish nobility" from articles such as Hieronim Augustyn Lubomirski. That article is already in "Category:Lubomirski", which is in "Category:Polish noble families", which is in "Category:Polish nobility". Appleseed (Talk) 03:43, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
PS, I started working on this, but obviously I haven't finished yet. Appleseed (Talk) 03:47, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Of course. :-) Appleseed (Talk) 00:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Estrella de granero[edit]

Gracias Gustavo. Desfortunadamente ya no tengo tanto tiempo para la wiki inglesa. He regresado a mi uni y el trabajo me ocupa todo el tiempo libre. Pero de vez en cuando regreso aqui para ver como te vienen las cosas :) Saludos. //Halibutt 14:45, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

move[edit]

I have moved Template and Infobox PolishCoA FULL structure to Wikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology/PolishCoA. Please feel free to move it to any other namespace (except of course (Main)!) and/or title. -- RHaworth 10:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Dolęga-Ossowski[edit]

Thanks for help.

Please add further comments if you can.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jemthepen#Inaccuracies_in_the_article_.22Count_Jan_Do.C5.82.C4.99ga-Ossowski

User:Jemthepen (1/19/2007)


Hi, Gustavo, you may be interested in this. — Kpalion(talk) 11:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made to Coat of arms of Hołownia[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule republika\.pl, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 02:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you make the Picture to Commons User:de:StillesGrinsen -84.138.176.183 10:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Polish user noticeboard?[edit]

Do you know if there is a noticeboard for users from Poland or users of Polish descent? I am the latter. - Britlawyer 20:15, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Easter![edit]

Happy Easter!

Hello Gustavo, thank you for the warm wishes. Happy Easter to you too. Appleseed (Talk) 19:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wesołego Alleluja, Gustavo. I'd like to expand Anders Army when I have time. If you want, we can collaborate on the research. - Britlawyer 15:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peronism[edit]

I agree with you, they fill all the criteria; so they should be listed on List of fascist movements by country. However, if Template:Fascism sidebar included every such movement, it would be hundreds of entries long. Therefore, the template should list only the very few most important movements. --Stlemur 05:16, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copernicus[edit]

¿Why does Copernicus was not a Polish and Dürer and Beethoven were Germans? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nationalism Patrol (talkcontribs) 13:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:About your pictures from Baranów Sand. castle[edit]

Ah, now I am sorry I did not take more pictures. You should definetly visit the castle, they have many more coats of arms around. I am sorry, but I don't recognize the three others.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  16:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Almost right :) It should be: "Herb Wawdicz w zamku w Baranowie Sandomierkim".-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  05:25, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in browsing through my recent Commons uploads; I have some images from Diocesan Museum in Sandomierz that contain Polish coat of arms on various items.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  23:46, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Stanislaw Antoni Szczuka - updated description on Commons, it should be ok now.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  15:24, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I don't remember anything else. I wish I had better camera and photo taking skills; it's really a shame that there are no other photos from that very interesting museum but mine. We can only hope that eventually a more skilled Wikipedian will visit that place and take more and better photos.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  06:03, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More pictures from my summer castle trip uploaded, some new coats of arms.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 17:45, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you look through my gallery of latest uploads you will see the photos, they are labelled accordingly.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 03:59, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Herb Holownia.PNG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Herb Holownia.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wesołych![edit]

User:Piotrus and friends, in the midsts of Wigilia, wish you to enjoy this Christmas Eve!



Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can[edit]

Matthias Corvinus' Black Legion.jpg[edit]

That's ok!:) your faitfull, Imredavid

Hallo Gustavo, can You edit article Sas coat-of-arms? Imho section about count Komarnicki's CoA is more heraldry legend than a historical truth. Lack a blasoning of arms, and not a word about history. For my poor english is that edition too complicated. Best regards, Steifer (talk) 12:01, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Necesito ayuda Heráldica Eclesiástica[edit]

Hola soy un usuario español y necesitaria ayuda y/o consejo para diseñar escudos eclesiásticos. Navegando por la wikipedia en inglés he visto que usted es natural del Uruguay y además de ascendencia polaca lo que nos vendría muy bien para conseguir los escudos de los cardenales Sapieha y Kakowski. Si he llegado aquí es por las pegas que me han puesto los diseñadores españoles (de España) al no ser escudos que sigan las leyes heráldicas extrictamente. Bueno espero su respuesta con impaciencia y muchas gracias por haber perdido este pequeño tiempo conmigo. Nota: si desea contestarme a la wikipedia en español por favor. Gracias --Villeguillo (talk) 10:20, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias, tranquilo hay tiempo, hay que tomarselo con calma, porque me vas a venir muy bien para ampliar artículos que he empezado como el Zarato de Polonia, Reino de Polonia (títere del II Reich), Gran Ducado de Varsovia, etc...
Nota: lo de sudaca no suena muy bien (aquí es peyorativo y mucha gente se lo toma a mal) aunque seas polaco.

Ah, por cierto, si uso pseudónimo, pero es muy fácil porque es el pueblo en donde vivo en España, y soy también noble, aunque de un rango más inferior soy un simple hidalgo castellano. Gracias. Un saludo. --Villeguillo (talk) 23:04, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. In the future, please do not experiment on article pages; instead, use the sandbox. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 12:52, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was for an image description that you inserted some description and then you removed it on the next edition of the file. I don't remember what image was but I remember this and that's why I sent this message. Pay attention to this common error. Regards, Sdrtirs (talk) 21:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese orthography questions[edit]

Responding to your question left in my talk page, those words are in Portuguese but one is in Standard Portuguese and the other is in Brazilian Portuguese. To explain it better, Standard Portuguese (Português padrão) or European Portugueses (Português europeu) is the definition of Portuguese language spoke in Portugal, where Poland is know as Polónia; the Brazilian Portuguese (Português brasileiro) is the Portuguese accent of Portuguese language spoke in Brazil, where Poland is known as Polônia. This is one difference between European Portuguese and Brazilian Portuguese.

Summary

I hope that I had explain it good to you. For more any questions, I'll be available. Regards, Sdrtirs (talk) 00:10, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sas[edit]

Hallo Gustavo, sorry that I answer just now. I was during journey two weeks. I find Yours corrections in article about Sas as very good, than You, best regards Steifer (talk) 20:44, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tú que dominas el inglés[edit]

Estimado señor: hay un pequeño problema en esta enciclopedia pero como no domino bien no sé solucionar por mi mismo. Hay dos artículos que tratan de lo mismo y los anglohablantes no se han dado cuenta y son: Jaime Balmes y Jaime Lucio Balmes. El primero estaba escrito en catalán Jaume y el segundo está mal hecha la traducción del segundo nombre es Luciano no Lucio. A ver que se puede hacer. Gracias. --Villeguillo (talk) 10:43, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias, pero lo que pedía es que se fusionaran los artículos. En la wikipedia en castellano sé colocar la caja donde dice hay que fusionar este artículo con el artículo cual, pero en la wikipedia inglesa no se hacerlo. Un bibliotecario sabría como hacerlo. Gracias por la información de los obispos y no te preocupes por lo que tardes.--Villeguillo (talk) 10:58, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've added the merge tags. My recent uploads to commons have a few coas: see gallery and look for categories for Polish Coat of Arms. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Poles in Uruguay[edit]

Perhaps you could add a section to Polonia#Latin_America? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 03:33, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I do, but I need to do some research.--Gustavo (talk) 03:51, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I will be looking forward to it! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:30, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merry XMAS[edit]

Merry XMAS from User:Piotrus. 12:15, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dołęga-Ossowski[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dołęga-Ossowski, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Lack of notability and reliable references, see here for discussion.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:40, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More Polish COAs on Commons[edit]

I am done with commons:Category:Museum of Archdiocese in Gniezno, some images have COAs to sort. Apologies for the poor quality on some, but it the room was dark and I was not allowed to use flash.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Witam serdecznie. W artykule pozwoliłem zamieścić jeszcze wzmiankę o jednym z bardziej znanych użytkowników herbu Kur - mianowicie o Mikołaju Kiczce. Na polskiej Wiki jest artykuł dotyczący tej osoby. Niestety sam nie przetłumaczę go na angielski. Jeśli można prosić o pomoc w tej sprawie to tą drogą zwracam się z taką prośbą. Artykuł nie jest zbyt wielki, a wiec nie powinien sprawic wiele problemu z translacją. Pozdrawiam Adam Kurowski--89.174.229.20 (talk) 07:41, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Ficke von Finkenstein CoA[edit]

Greeetings,
I was looking at the article of Finck von Finckenstein on Wiki and I think that it need some correction. First, calling it variation of Ostoja is an old error of some nationalistic polish mind. Then, the list of those that used this CoA should be revided since most of the names on the list did not use this CoA but original Ostoja or it variation. However, there are some families that are linked to Ostoja Clan that used this CoA, for ex. Lniski family. I think therefore, the list should include only those families that used what we call "Ostoja Pruska". Furtheremore, there is a variation of this CoA for the family of Finck de Finkenthal that received nobility in 1805, most knowned as Finke CoA. Also this Finke CoA have nothing to do with Ostoja.
Best regards,

Camdan (talk) 16:59, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin/Heraldic clan Korwin[edit]

Hi Gustavo, you cannot link to User:Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin/Heraldic clan Korwin from mainspace articles as a reference (or at all actually). All references should be to 3rd party reliable sources, please remove the links you readded to Korwin coat of arms--Jac16888Talk 16:59, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Śląskie herb.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:58, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Translation[edit]

Greetings, I would like to ask You if it is possible for You to translate or describe polish Blazon in english? Its a very specific language and I know that there are several CoA that need to be translated in correct way. Unfortunately, Im not able to do that myself. Any help will be very appriciated. If You cannot help, maybe You know someone that can do? Thank You for Your kind help Sir! Sincerely, Camdan 09:55, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Acalamari 18:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Normal Zawadzki herb.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:12, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Wojewodztwo swietokrzyskie herb.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:19, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Wlkp herb.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:19, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Warminsko-mazurskie herb.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:50, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Finke coat of arms has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable without significant coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 02:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aleksander Korwin Gosiewski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Biała, Mścisław, False Dmitri, Siege of Smolensk, Unity Day and Olsza

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:00, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wincenty Korwin Gosiewski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wierzbowo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:44, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hunyady/Hunyadi[edit]

The mediaeval Hunyadi family which gave King Mathias to Hungary is not related to the Hunyady de Kéthely family. Some members of the Hunyady de Kéthely claimed some very vague relation to the royal Hunyadi family, and obtained the privilage to use the Hunyadi raven in their coat of arms, but even themselves never produced a plausible genealogy going back to the Hunyadis and historians and genealogists don't consider the two families related. Please see the official site of the Hunyady de Kéthely family [2] . According to their own site they were ennobled only in 1607.--Csesznekgirl (talk) 12:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Szlachta[edit]

Maybe you could help on:

List of Polish noble families with the title of Count

List of Polish noble families with the title of Baron

List of Polish noble families with the title of Marquess

The lists are not complete yet. Thx --Sobiepan (talk) 08:48, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 18:35, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Fornalski.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:04, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Majorat[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Majorat, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. MiguelMadeira (talk) 11:08, 6 February 2015 (UTC) --MiguelMadeira (talk) 11:08, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good to hear from you again. I suggest you repost your comment to the article's talk, and notify WProjects Poland, Lithuania, Germany and milhist for a larger discussion, as I don't have that much time to look deeply into the issue. A quick scan of some Polish books suggests the following titles: "wojny 1587– 1588" (war of 1587-1588), "wojna domowa w latach 1587-1588" (civil war of 1587-1588), "Wojna z Maksymilianem" (war with Maximillian). One books calls it an "invasion of Maximillian", and pl wiki in the list of pl wars lists its as "wyprawa Maksymiliana Habsburga po koronę polską " (Maximillian's expedition for the Polish crown). Davies does not name the conflict at all. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:13, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Aleksander Polanowski, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Herb Glinski.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:58, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbCiezosil.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 11:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 11:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Drogoslaw.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:51, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Grand COA of Sapiega family (Lithuania).png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Gryf herb.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:30, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbEssen.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:54, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbErbs.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbDrzewica.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbDrya4.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbCieleski.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbChorynski.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbBogoria2.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbChalecki.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbCharyton.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbEstken.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbFogelfeder.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbHilzen.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbHodyc.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:38, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbHusarzewski.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:38, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbHutor.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:38, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbJakimowicz.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:38, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbJodzieszko.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:38, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbKarega.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbKarnickiI.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbKarnickiII.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbKarp.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbKorczyk.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbKordysz.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbKotwicz.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbKronwald.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbKruzer.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbKujk.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbKulak.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbKulikowski.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbSiekierz.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbSzeliga.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbTrestka.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbTrzywdar.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:HerbWysocki.ws.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Herb Korczak.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Herb Leliwa.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Herb Lis.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Herb Nabram.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Herb Orla.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Herb Pogon Ruska.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Herb Prus II.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Herb Starykon.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Herb Topor.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Herb Wąż.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Herb rodowy Finckensteinów.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aleksander Polanowski[edit]

Hello, Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Aleksander Polanowski".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 18:32, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! I would like to ask You if You have time and interest to improve the art. about Polish heraldry? We need references to the section of Peculiarities and also discussion whatto addand what to remove,what to improve. Intension isto makethe art a "Good Art." Thank You! Best regards, camdan (talk) 13:52, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kamecki coat of arms for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kamecki coat of arms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamecki coat of arms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 15:45, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Allan coat of arms for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allan coat of arms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allan coat of arms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 11:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Antoniewicz coat of arms for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antoniewicz coat of arms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antoniewicz coat of arms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 11:59, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Azulewicz coat of arms for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Azulewicz coat of arms is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azulewicz coat of arms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 12:00, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding a noble family[edit]

Hello there, I was wondering if you have any sources on the Krzywicki family and their ownership of the Pogon Litewska coat of arms. Do you know anything about them and their relation to the Gediminids, their history in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth/Grand Duchy of Lithuania? Thank you. KrivisKrivisKrivaitis (talk) 18:59, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Polish nobility coats of arms images has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Polish nobility coats of arms images has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:18, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]