Jump to content

User talk:HKman767

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


August 2017

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hong Kong Stock Exchange has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:38, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Café de Coral. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Café de Coral was changed by Cocks Wong (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884769 on 2017-08-06T01:40:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:40, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at South African cuisine, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: South African cuisine was changed by Cocks Wong (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951289 on 2017-08-06T01:43:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:44, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:44, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

HKman767 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I was only joking and now I wanna get serious about editing. Sorry. Cocks Wong (talk) 01:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

For the reasons described below. Yamla (talk) 12:34, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In order for us to believe that you're even capable of being serious about editing, you're going to need to:
  • Wait a few months -- we weren't born yesterday, there's no way you've suddenly grown up.
  • Don't cause any other trouble while you're gone. You're free to read the site but that's it.
  • After coming back to this account's talk page, you need to explain what you did wrong. Explain it as if we did not know (we do, but we can't be sure that you know what you did wrong until you give us this explanation).
  • Explain what sort of edits you will make if you become serious, with specific details. That is, you need to tell us on this page:
  • What article you would make a change to if you were unblocked right now.
  • What specific change you would make right now. Something like I would change the part of (title) article that says "(statement)" to "(alternative statement)" or I would like to add "(statement with source)" to (title) article.
  • Why you explain this change is an improvement.
That's pretty much the only way to be unblocked. Not doing those things will keep you blocked. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and it seems pretty likely that you're really this other user. If so, you would need to appeal under that account. Ian.thomson (talk) 11:24, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]