User talk:Hakuli

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Coat of arms of Albania.svgThis user participates in
WikiProject Albania.
Flag of Kosovo.svgThis user participates in
WikiProject Kosovo.

Article[edit]

Please do not delete sources and do not disturb neutral stable version that was there for years. If you have any proposition in this area, please, DONT revert other editors, but go to talk page, and first AGREE on other version, and then someone should edit it. Please do not use Wikipedia as the place of propaganda and ethnic struggle. If you need any help how to make Wikipedia neutral, talk to me. Thank you! --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 20:54, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

In this article I have found sources that are not in English, as well as this article contains Serbian nationalism and anti-Albanianism. I edited this article based on United Nations and OSCE resources.

No matter how long the article has been in this version! All my edits have been made in accordance with the laws of Wikipedia, all my sources are neutral and are not pro-Serb or pro-Albanian. The pro-Serbian and pro-Albanian versions are very different from each other! --Hakuli (talk) 20:17, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

March 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Adem Jashari, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Do not remove sourced sentences, that is vandalism Axiomus (talk) 16:54, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

All edits I've made are in compliance with Wikipedia's laws! I am against Serbian extremism in wikipedia. Adem Jashari is a hero in Kosovo, and here in wikipedia he is misunderstood by Serbian ultra-nationalists!--Hakuli (talk) 00:53, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Invitation[edit]

Coat of arms of Albania.svg

Hello!
I noticed you've made edits or that you are in some way connected to Albania or Albanians related articles.

We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Albania and Albanians related topics and are organized within WikiProject Albania.
I thought that you may be interested in viewing the current tasks of our WikiProject or its talk page and get involved. Furthermore, if you are interested in joining the wikiproject, please feel free to add your name in the Participants' page!.

Thank you and, again, welcome among us!

Ktrimi991 (talk) 10:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Page moves[edit]

Hi Hakuli. Listen, I reverted you at Trepça Mines actually not because I agree or disagree with you, but because I think this move is controversial and should go trough consensus at talk-page. Regards, FkpCascais (talk) 00:45, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 999912345K (talk) 16:08, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Please do not copy and paste the text that I added to your talk page. Please edit under rules of Wikipedia --Hakuli (talk) 18:43, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Holy Serbian Doctrine[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article The Holy Serbian Doctrine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An anti-Serbian pamphlet filled with Original Research. Not a theme, invented at Albanian Wikipedia (from where it also should be deleted).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zoupan 22:58, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Just noting that it was translated from Albanian Wikipedia article Doktrina e shenjtë serbe, by Albanian Wikipedia User:Dan.--Zoupan 23:00, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:COAŠtrpce.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:COAŠtrpce.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:36, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

2004 March Unrest[edit]

Hello Hakulli,

This is about the article 2004 unrest in Kosovo. I asked you a couple of questions on Talk Page, but you haven't respond so I will say here the same stuff.

You haven't based your edits on UN and OSCE documents, you've based part of your edits on one OSCE document you haven't even properly read. Here is your last edit: [1], while others before with the same edits are: [2], [3], [4], [5] and [6] - after the revertings of not one, but a number of other users. You've removed the whole text in the Background section, the text with sources from Human Rights Watch[1] and ICTY[2]. You replaced the text in the "Background section" from the one from the OSCE document you cited. The OSCE document you cited as source[3], "MISSION IN KOSOVO Monitoring Department, Legal System Monitoring Section - Four Years Later" deals with the situation four years after the March Pogrom. That's the reason why the March Pogrom was in the Introduction section of OSCE document - it is, because, again, the documents is about 4 years after the event. It deals with the the legal topics and criticism of weak reactions from Kosovo courts. Just look at the names of the sections, if you don't want to read them - Problems with the appeals, Kosovo Prosecutor’s Office withholding case files etc. Read the section, for example, Ethnic motives ignored from page 13 of the document. Why haven't you added these, for example, as a reactions towards March 2004 pogrom and legal reactions from the courts in Kosovo? That is connected to the article. As you said, this is a neutral source. In the text you added, quote "On 17 and 18 March 2004, a wave of violent riots swept through Kosovo, triggered by two incidents perceived as ethnically-motivated acts", why you haven't explained which two incidents, as it was explained in the OSCE document? Why you haven't closely read the document - I don't know and I won't jump to the conclusion, but from this above it is obvious that you didn't.

As for removing the word Serb in Serb owned house to Minority owned, your excuse was that it was to make the article appear more neutral. That is not a neutrality, that's ignoring the facts, for example, that the picture name is Downtown Vista with Ruins of Serb House Destroyed in 2004 Pogrom - Prizren - Kosovo if not anything else. Totally replacing the name of the nationality of the victim, is the act which is, wrongly or not, perceived as a bias. Following this logic, then in all of the incidents, pogroms, wars and other articles, the nationality of the victim who is minority in some territory should be replaced with, what, "Minority" - that is not allowed, for the reasons cited to you by everybody else on this page, in the talk page or in the explanations of revertions of your edits in history section. This replacement wasn't done in other sources in the article which aren't Albanian or Serbian, so why it was done by you? This is clearly not helping on some neutrality and clearly not on objectivity. As for the discussion, I haven't seen any consensus for your changes except that everyone here is against - so much about your "I have discussed it on the Talk Page". So, I ask you here, after all of this:

  1. 1. Why you removed the whole Background section of March event and replaced it with the text about March Event itself (logic: Background of the event is the event itself?)?
  2. 2. Why you removed the term "Serb" in a picture of destroyed Serb owned house and how the replacing the name of the victim should add more, allegedly, neutrality to the article?

Best regards, James Jim Moriarty (talk) 22:39, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

With all respect for all nations, I edited that article for controversial reasons between Albanians and Serbs. Albanians completely deny that they were the cause of the March riots, while they categorically deny that they destroyed and persecuted Serbs from their home.

The KLA is not related to these unrest, the only connection is that these unrest took place five years after the Kosovo war of 1999, so the KLA was transferred to the KPC. --Hakuli (talk) 23:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

As I gave you explanation, from that there is no excuse for replacing "Serb owned" to "Minority owned". As for the "Background section paragraph" - it seems that you didn't understood why numerous of other users edited it like that. The point of the paragraph is to provide introduction to the topic as it was done in the literature - so, the war as a main event in that territory which happened just 5 years before was mentioned and that includes the warring sides, goals, crimes, but the main foxus was to provide introduction to the social situation there after the war and before 2004 March pogrom of Serbs and other minorities in Kosovo. That's why, for example, missions of UNMIK and KFOR were mentioned - but you removed them. I am pretty confused why you didn't mentioned that this too was in the background section of the article. It wasn't just about the KLA. For example, following your logic, why you didn't told the same thing about Yugoslav army. After Kumanovo agreement they were pulled back from Kosovo in 1999, so they didn't had connection with the unrest at all if we use that logic. In difference to the Yugoslav Army, many of KLA's former members who were leading figures in KLA, became among the most influential Albanian politicians in Kosovo during that time, even today. So, in any case, they were in the government and they have at least responsibility, especially after pretty weak and dubious actions of the courts in Kosovo on that case, as it was explained and analyzed in the OSCE document you've put as literature. In any case, you didn't elaborated your replacements of the text, you made a logical mistake during that replacement and you haven't read carefully the whole document because it has pretty interesting stuff about the unrest and it's aftermath. I am not accusing you for some bias and driving towards nationalistic editing. I am almost certain that you are doing these edits in a good faith, but you need to be more careful and more cooperative with other users because sometimes, your actions seem to point out to bias towards one group of people and everything in the literature which is connected to them. As I said I believe you that this is not the case, so be more cooperative and elaborate more your edits next time.

Best regards, James Jim Moriarty (talk) 14:11, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

References

Disambiguation link notification for April 1[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kosovo–Turkey relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justice and Development Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Education in Gjilan into Gjilan. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:43, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Barmassacre.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The file File:Barmassacre.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a cropped version of File:Marcharmenians.jpg, which depicts Armenians being deported by the Ottoman Turks during the Armenian Genocide, not Albanian prisoners. Other than being an obvious copy of an existing image, it is deliberately misleading.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 23 editor (talk) 00:45, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Barmassacre.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The file File:Barmassacre.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a cropped version of File:Marcharmenians.jpg, which depicts Armenians being deported by the Ottoman Turks during the Armenian Genocide, not Albanian prisoners. Other than being an obvious copy of an existing image, it is deliberately misleading.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 23 editor (talk) 00:47, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Notice[edit]

Hi Hakuli. Listen, you should urgently add your arguments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Holy Serbian Doctrine. Just letting you know so we can hear your reasons. Dont say I am not a friend. Regards, FkpCascais (talk) 16:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Gjilan has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:42, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

SPI[edit]

Hi. Someone has opened an investigation on suspicion that this is not your first account on Wikipedia [7]. You can defend yourself on the page in the link. Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:54, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

picture moving[edit]

Hello, I wanted to ask you if you could transfer these pictures to Commons, because they are really good for articles in other languages. Greeting --Lirim | T 22:36, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Verrat e Llukes.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Verrat e Llukes.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:14, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Rreth File:FFKosovo.svg[edit]

File:FFKosovo.png
Logoja e cila e kam ngarkuar une
@Hakuli: Pershendetje, Hakuli, sot po ta shkruaj kete si lloj mesazhi jo per kritike, por per faleminderim per qe e ki ngarku logon e re me nje kualitet te larte! Ndoshta e ki pare qe para se ta ngarkoni ju logon e kam ngarku une logon por me nje kualitet te dobet dhe po ashtu e pashe qe ne logon qe ki ngarku te kane dalur disa probleme me licensimin dhe logoja qe e kam ngarku une nuk ka problem e kshtu te ftoj qe nese ta fshijn logon lirisht mundesh mi ngarku logon e cila eshte me kualitet te larte ne logon qe e kam ngarku une e nese i kalon problemet me logon, atehere nese mundesh e ban "move" ose mi bashku logon qe e kam ngarku une. EndritoxiPhotography (talk) 20:40, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
@EndritoxiPhotography: faliminderit, te kisha sygjeru me perdor Adobe Illustrator dhe logot me i bo ne formatin SVG per shkak te kualitetit! FLM
@Hakuli: E di, po une jam nje fotograf amator dhe marakli i fotove! Sjam naj far fotografi dhe nuk mundem te qasem ne Adobe Illustrator se une si shumica e shqiptareve e kam kompjuterin 1giga RAM! LOL! Siq ta lartpermenda nese ta hjekin logon sherri i licenses lirisht munesh qat foton qe e ki ba me kualitet te larte me e qit te qajo foto qe e kam qit une se mua per qudi nuk me kane nxjerr problemi per licence dhe kete si lloj kerkese qe po ta beje nuk e kam per kurrfar interesi e kam veq per ndihme, naten e mire! EndritoxiPhotography (talk) 22:22, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
@Hakuli: Per fat te keq, logoja qe e ki ngarku ti ne shumicen e artikujve te perfaqesueses se Kosoves ne futboll eshte hjekur dhe e kam zevendsu me logon qe e kam ngarku une nashta nuk te ofendoj e lirisht munesh qat logon qe e ki me kualitet te larte mi qit te logoja ku e kam ngarku une si verzion me te mire se une nuk muj mi qit, shkaku se mu kane blloku IP ne Wikimedia Commons! EndritoxiPhotography (talk) 21:33, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
@EndritoxiPhotography: Jo nuk mundemi me bo update logon tonde se ajo osht ne formatin PNG kurse kjo e jemja osht ne formatin SVG. Te tregova edhe me lart se logot duhet me u bo ne formatin SVG per shkak se ky format nuk ka pixels, pra kualiteti del ma i mir. Lexoje SVG --Hakuli (talk) 19:38, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

File:FFKosovo.svg[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:DritaChamp.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:DritaChamp.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 23:57, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Uploads[edit]

G'day Hakuli. You uploaded two pics yesterday. Since you are interested in contributing with pics, and have done a hard work till now, I would suggest you to familiarize yourself with the relevant rules so no more works of yours get deleted. Cheers, Ktrimi991 (talk) 11:48, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FC Drita, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mitrovica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Demaci.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Demaci.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 00:08, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:OSAdemJashariDrita.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:OSAdemJashariDrita.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 00:21, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gjila-anniversary-independence.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Gjila-anniversary-independence.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 00:27, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:KosovoROSU.jpeg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:KosovoROSU.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 00:31, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Special Intervention Unit SIU.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Special Intervention Unit SIU.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 00:33, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gjilanatnigh.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Gjilanatnigh.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 00:35, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Flaka e janarit.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Flaka e janarit.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:44, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Muzaka.svg[edit]

Copyright-excl.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Muzaka.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 21:00, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Balshajt.svg[edit]

Copyright-excl.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Balshajt.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 11:01, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Intelektualët[edit]

Hi, I'm CapitalSasha. Hakuli, thanks for creating Intelektualët!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The sole reference in this article has a broken link.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

CapitalSasha ~ talk 15:49, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 FC Drita season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mitrovica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Intelektualet.svg[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 FC Drita season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middlefield (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 4 September 2018 (UTC)