User talk:Harthacnut

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Blitzkrieg[edit]

I agree with every thing you say. To my mind this article should never have become a FA, it failed to deal with many of the issues concerning the myths of the so-called doctrine. I'll have a mess about anyway. Dapi89 (talk) 11:40, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

QT template[edit]

Hi Harthacnut,

I saw your recent edits to the Quentin Tarantion template. Join me in the discussion, will you? --Soetermans | is listening | what he'd do now? 14:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Harthacnut. You have new messages at Raeky's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— raeky (talk | edits) 20:28, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Adelaide Anne Procter FAC[edit]

Hi, Harthacnut - a while back you commented on the Adelaide Anne Procter FAC. I was wondering if you wished to re-visit / add to your comments, or vote to either support or oppose the nomination. Best, Ricardiana (talk) 00:23, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

It's raining thanks spam![edit]

  • Please pardon the intrusion. This tin of thanks spam is offered to everyone who commented or !voted (Support, Oppose or Neutral) on my recent RfA. I appreciate the fact that you care enough about the encyclopedia and its community to participate in this forum.
  • There are a host of processes that further need community support, including content review (WP:GAN, WP:PR, WP:FAC, and WP:FAR). You can also consider becoming a Wikipedia Ambassador. If you have the requisite experience and knowledge, consider running for admin yourself!
  • If you have any further comments, input or questions, please do feel free to drop a line to me on my talk page. I am open to all discussion. Thanks • Ling.Nut (talk) 02:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC)