I agree with every thing you say. To my mind this article should never have become a FA, it failed to deal with many of the issues concerning the myths of the so-called doctrine. I'll have a mess about anyway. Dapi89 (talk) 11:40, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Adelaide Anne Procter FAC
Hi, Harthacnut - a while back you commented on the Adelaide Anne Procter FAC. I was wondering if you wished to re-visit / add to your comments, or vote to either support or oppose the nomination. Best, Ricardiana (talk) 00:23, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
It's raining thanks spam!
- Please pardon the intrusion. This tin of thanks spam is offered to everyone who commented or !voted (Support, Oppose or Neutral) on my recent RfA. I appreciate the fact that you care enough about the encyclopedia and its community to participate in this forum.
- There are a host of processes that further need community support, including content review (WP:GAN, WP:PR, WP:FAC, and WP:FAR). You can also consider becoming a Wikipedia Ambassador. If you have the requisite experience and knowledge, consider running for admin yourself!
- If you have any further comments, input or questions, please do feel free to drop a line to me on my talk page. I am open to all discussion. Thanks • Ling.Nut (talk) 02:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Ancestors of Caroline Matilda
Template:Ancestors of Caroline Matilda has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. PBS (talk) 12:54, 9 April 2015 (UTC)