User talk:Harthacnut

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Blitzkrieg[edit]

I agree with every thing you say. To my mind this article should never have become a FA, it failed to deal with many of the issues concerning the myths of the so-called doctrine. I'll have a mess about anyway. Dapi89 (talk) 11:40, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

QT template[edit]

Hi Harthacnut,

I saw your recent edits to the Quentin Tarantion template. Join me in the discussion, will you? --Soetermans | is listening | what he'd do now? 14:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Harthacnut. You have new messages at Raeky's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— raeky (talk | edits) 20:28, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Adelaide Anne Procter FAC[edit]

Hi, Harthacnut - a while back you commented on the Adelaide Anne Procter FAC. I was wondering if you wished to re-visit / add to your comments, or vote to either support or oppose the nomination. Best, Ricardiana (talk) 00:23, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

It's raining thanks spam![edit]

  • Please pardon the intrusion. This tin of thanks spam is offered to everyone who commented or !voted (Support, Oppose or Neutral) on my recent RfA. I appreciate the fact that you care enough about the encyclopedia and its community to participate in this forum.
  • There are a host of processes that further need community support, including content review (WP:GAN, WP:PR, WP:FAC, and WP:FAR). You can also consider becoming a Wikipedia Ambassador. If you have the requisite experience and knowledge, consider running for admin yourself!
  • If you have any further comments, input or questions, please do feel free to drop a line to me on my talk page. I am open to all discussion. Thanks • Ling.Nut (talk) 02:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ancestors of Caroline Matilda[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Ancestors of Caroline Matilda has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. PBS (talk) 12:54, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)