User talk:Havstad112

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Havstad112, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Elvegata, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! PamD 22:28, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elvegata[edit]

The article Elvegata has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability: it's a street, it exists, but we don't need an article on every street in the world.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 22:28, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Fortifications of Kristiansand[edit]

Hi, I'm Darylgolden. Havstad112, thanks for creating Fortifications of Kristiansand!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi there, thanks for creating this page! I noticed that there are no references to support the facts in the article however. You may refer to WP:REFB for a guide to adding references. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 23:08, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Klappane[edit]

Would you please add contents and sources? It's not an article.07:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Xx236 (talk)

Krossen (Kristiansand)[edit]

Krossen, Kristiansand ?Xx236 (talk) 08:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC) There are millions of gas stations in the world an dthey aren't notable. Xx236 (talk) 06:06, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fidje[edit]

A tag has been placed on Fidje requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Non notable place

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:58, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kjos Haveby[edit]

It's not an article but few words only.
There is no such article in both Norway Wikipedias. Why do you think Kjos Haveby is important?Xx236 (talk) 06:05, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

You have created a series of one line sub-substubs. Please compare no:Setesdalsveien (Kristiansand) and no:Bydeler i Kristiansand. Xx236 (talk) 06:11, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grim torv[edit]

Hello, Havstad112. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Grim torv, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 21:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Høietun[edit]

Hello, Havstad112. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Høietun, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 21:05, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kolsdalen[edit]

Hello, Havstad112. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Kolsdalen, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 21:06, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Koboltveien[edit]

Hello, Havstad112. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Koboltveien, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 21:06, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kolsberg[edit]

Hello, Havstad112. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Kolsberg, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 21:07, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nordtjønnåsen[edit]

Hello, Havstad112. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Nordtjønnåsen, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 21:07, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kjerrheia[edit]

Hello, Havstad112. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Kjerrheia, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 21:08, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Krossen (Kristiansand)[edit]

The article Krossen (Kristiansand) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

With no references, how can we verify this neighborhood's notability, or even its existence? Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ubiquity (talk) 21:11, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Suldalen[edit]

The article Suldalen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

With no references, how can we verify this neighborhood's notability, or even its existence? Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ubiquity (talk) 21:11, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grimsmyra[edit]

The article Grimsmyra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

With no references, how can we verify this neighborhood's notability, or even its existence? Does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ubiquity (talk) 21:12, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oddernes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Birkeland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 29 August[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Kvadraturen (Kristiansand) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bjørndalssletta

added a link pointing to Birkeland

Vågsbygd

added a link pointing to Betong

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Henrik Wergelands gate[edit]

The article Henrik Wergelands gate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tollbodgata[edit]

The article Tollbodgata has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dronningens gate (Kristiansand)[edit]

The article Dronningens gate (Kristiansand) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Markens gate[edit]

The article Markens gate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Festningsgata[edit]

The article Festningsgata has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, with no indication of notability per WP:GEOROAD

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 16:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Henrik Wergelands gate for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henrik Wergelands gate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henrik Wergelands gate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dronningens gate (Kristiansand) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dronningens gate (Kristiansand) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dronningens gate (Kristiansand) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Havstad112, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

NordicDragon Talkpage 08:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Festningsgata for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Festningsgata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Festningsgata until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 10:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]