User talk:Hawkeye7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Wikipe-tan the Library of Babel.png

Archives:

2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016

Contents

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 22:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

Military historian of the Year[edit]

Silverwiki 2.png The Silver Wiki
For "[your] ongoing efforts to improve our coverage of the Manhattan Project and nearly everything associated with it (not to mention [your] efforts as a project coordinator and continued support in the form of MILHIST bot, and help improving other articles through our review processes etc)" I have the pleasure of presenting you with this Silver Wiki. Congratulations! For the Military history WikiProject, TomStar81 (Talk) 09:06, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Completing the Aussie trifecta with Rupert and PM -- great work, Hawkeye. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:09, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Congratulations, Hawkeye. Well deserved. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Seconded. Well deserved mate and happy new year! Irondome (talk) 22:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year Hawkeye7![edit]

--Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Hawkeye7![edit]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

2016 Year in Review Awards[edit]

Barnstar-stone2-noback.png The Epic Barnstar
For your contributions to history related articles in 2016, I hereby present you with this Epic Barnstar. Congratulations! For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 04:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
World War II Barnstar.svg The World War Barnstar
For your contributions to articles Calutron, Isidor Isaac Rabi, Douglas MacArthur's escape from the Philippines, Chicago Pile-1, and Montreal Laboratory, all of which are related to World War II, I hereby present you with this World War Barnstar. Congratulations! For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 04:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Nuclear Barnstar Hires.png The Nuclear Barnstar
For your contributions to articles Calutron, Isidor Isaac Rabi, Chicago Pile-1, and Montreal Laboratory, all of which are related to nuclear warfare, I hereby present you with this Nuclear Warfare Barnstar. Congratulations! For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 04:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Wiki medal.jpg The Featured Article Medal
For your outstanding contributions to the Featured Articles Calutron, Isidor Isaac Rabi, Douglas MacArthur's escape from the Philippines, Chicago Pile-1, and Montreal Laboratory, all of which obtained Featured Article status in 2016, I hereby present you with this Featured Article Medal. Congratulations! For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 04:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Request for comment/review[edit]

Hi Hawkeye7. Just letting you know I have a trifecta of M2M articles up for review: Shades of Purple is nominated for GA, M2M (band) is nominated for peer review (I intend to nominate it for GA once the peer review is closed), and The Big Room is nominated for DYK. I thought you might be interested in at least having a look at the improvements to the articles, if not commenting/reviewing one. I would be most happy to review one of your active nominations in return if you like. Have a nice day. :) Freikorp (talk) 07:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

TFA[edit]

Thank you for the Clinton Engineer Works, "the Manhattan Project's largest facility"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jean Tatlock[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jean Tatlock you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 凰兰时罗 -- 凰兰时罗 (talk) 04:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Quarterly Milhist Reviewing Award: Oct to Dec 16[edit]

Wiki-stripe1.svg Military history reviewers' award
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a total of 3 Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period October to December 2016. Your ongoing efforts to support Wikipedia's quality content processes are greatly appreciated. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 04:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for S-50 (Manhattan Project)[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 9 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article S-50 (Manhattan Project), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Manhattan Project's liquid thermal diffusion plant was the only production-scale plant of its kind ever built? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/S-50 (Manhattan Project). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, S-50 (Manhattan Project)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:02, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Tech News: 2017-02[edit]

19:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of S-50 (Manhattan Project)[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article S-50 (Manhattan Project) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of S-50 (Manhattan Project)[edit]

The article S-50 (Manhattan Project) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:S-50 (Manhattan Project) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of S-50 (Manhattan Project)[edit]

The article S-50 (Manhattan Project) you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:S-50 (Manhattan Project) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:41, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Salt Wells Pilot Plant[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 11 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Salt Wells Pilot Plant, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that on two occasions, aircraft carrying explosives from the Salt Wells Pilot Plant were struck by lightning? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Salt Wells Pilot Plant. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Salt Wells Pilot Plant), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:01, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


In this diff you added a sentence:
Lauritsen pushed for a decision, and in April it was decided to use the meting and casting method.
Was that supposed to be "melting and casting"? Shenme (talk) 01:16, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Yes. Thanks for that. Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:33, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jean Tatlock[edit]

The article Jean Tatlock you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Jean Tatlock for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 凰兰时罗 -- 凰兰时罗 (talk) 01:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Hawkeye7, may I trouble you for a favor? I noticed that you are very experienced with GA nominations both on reviewing and being reviewed sides. Could you possible review my recent review of Jean Tatlock nomination? I'd like to know how my efforts conform to the "standards", and what were strong and weak points. If you feel you'll be more candid in private communication, please shoot me a short email. Thanks, 凰兰时罗 (talk) 18:47, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
I think you did a good job. I had no argument with your suggestions, but in some cases I was unsure about what you wanted. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:18, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Did it become clear eventually, or you are still having black spots on some of my suggestions? 凰兰时罗 (talk) 23:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
First of all I would like to say that the article is better for our interaction, which is all-important. Secondly, resolving problems like giving the wrong impression, or implementing NPOV invariably require another pair of eyes, which is why I put the article up for review. Such problems are hard to spot because I know what I meant when I wrote it. On the other hand, I sometimes employ the full force of the English language to address issues without noting them explicitly or to skate over controversial points by being ambiguous. Your suggestion to add the suicide note was most welcome, but I suspect is what you were referring to by "already moved beyond GA criteria". Jean Tatlock is as good as I could get it but I don't think it will ever proceed any further. I often submit articles which have been written as featured articles (although they may be unlikely to get there due to the restrictions at FAC) and reviewers often get carried away and start reviewing as it it were a FAC. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for a more detailed explanation. I completely agree with your approach, i.e. with the benefits of a second opinion. Here is what I meant by "already moved beyond GA criteria". I believe that a reviewer should not try to impose her/his style beyond GA criteria. So, when I see an issue, I'm often tempted to fix it in a particular way that is congruent with my style. However, I remind myself that my approach is no panacea, and the article's editor(s) can do the fixing in a way they are most comfortable with. In essence, by writing this phrase I was stopping myself from being too prescriptive. BTW I would apply this same logic to FA criteria. I think that there are infinitely many ways to write a featured article which will (a) satisfy all the criteria (b) will be enjoyed by the readers (c) will make the editor(s) and wiki-community proud. So, from my standpoint, a good GA/FA reviewer knows how to separate what objectively needs to be done from what he/she would do to achieve that. 凰兰时罗 (talk) 05:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Round8[edit]

The current template is somewhat screwed up. One of the lines contains a break, which ruins the aesthetics of the bracket. See here. It's specifically on that third semi finalist entry spot. Any thoughts? - J man708 (talk) 03:10, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

It works fine for me but I have a 3rdplace=yes card. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:45, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
I've adjusted your article (yes, I know) Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
I'm so confused at what caused that! - J man708 (talk) 04:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Email[edit]

Hi Hawkeye7, I sent you an email. Go Phightins! 04:18, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Page mover[edit]

Would you like the page mover user right? I noticed your comment at ORCP that you'd prefer not to fiddle with redirects when moving pages, and that user right helps in many of those situations. You obviously qualify. ~ Rob13Talk 22:36, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Yes! I feel embarassed. I wasn't aware of this. I remember voting for it, but hadn't noticed that it had been created. It would have come in handy this morning. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for SS Broompark (1939)[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 14 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article SS Broompark (1939), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in June 1940 the SS Broompark brought French scientists, heavy water, and diamonds to Britain? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/SS Broompark (1939). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, SS Broompark (1939)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Bug report[edit]

Thx for the bot, it's very helpful. See WT:TFA#Recently featured again (not the part about Jan 4, the rest of it). I initially thought this wouldn't be an issue because it would be infrequent and I could fix it by hand ... and I can, but it's happening more often than I remembered that part of a title is italicized and part isn't, and I keep forgetting to do it. If this is going to be a pain, don't worry about it. - Dank (push to talk) 13:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

S-50[edit]

Thanks for the note about S-50 (Manhattan Project). Nice work! --Orlady (talk) 15:20, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Pioneer Cabin Tree[edit]

Were back and a full review is needed. Thank you. 7&6=thirteen () 17:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Clive Ward[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Clive Ward you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 03:40, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Tech News: 2017-03[edit]

23:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2017[edit]

Your Rio Photo[edit]

Just wanted to drop a quick note, great photo of you from Rio but if you attend a future major games event please don't post a photo that includes your accreditation/credentials. SportsMedGuy (talk) 19:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Mary Jackson[edit]

Hi! I saw your edit to Mary Jackson (engineer), and was just curious what your change accomplished. The edit summary says "rm annoying error messages," but I wasn't seeing errors on the previous version. I looked at the documentation of {{citation}} and still have no idea what ref=none does. GorillaWarfare (talk) 07:10, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

The error messages I got looked like warning: There is no link pointing to this citation. The anchor is named CITEREFCzarneckiJackson1958. By default the {{citation}} template creates an anchor equivalent to that created by ref=harv when you are using {{cite journal}} or {{cite book}}. But with them ref=none (ie do not create an anchor) is the default. The anchors are normally used with references; the {{harvnb}} and {{sfn}} templates create nice links to them. So that when you click on the link in an inline reference, it takes you down to the book in the references section and highlights the book. You don't need them in a list of publications, because there are no inline references to them. (Note that I didn't add one to the journal citation, because it didn't need it.) The ref=none form is in the documentation of {{citation}}: see Template:Citation#Anchored citations.
As to why I can see the error message and you can't, the reason is that I seem to have a Javascript that runs a JQuery to spot these errors called User:Ucucha/HarvErrors.js It's been in User:Hawkeye7/common.js since 13 November 2011; I guess I had forgotten all about it. It normally warns me that a reference is wrong. I should have marked the change as "minor", since it is invisible to the readers. My apologies for that.
Great job on the article! Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
(Belated) thanks for the explanation! I'll have to look into that script... Thanks for the DYK review also! GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for John Challens[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 21 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Challens, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the British scientist John Challens received the American Medal of Freedom for his work on the V-1 flying bomb and the V-2 rocket? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Challens. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John Challens), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:01, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Tech News: 2017-04[edit]

20:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Herb Chen[edit]

Hey H., Noting your interest in physics biographies, I wonder if you might have a quick look at some point at the article I have been working on the past month: Herbert H. Chen. There are still some missing pieces (I have an inquiry in on Chen's dissertation title), but mostly I am sometimes foggy on some of the technicalities of Wikipedia articles. The Chen article is a little challenging - I knew him and by all accounts he was a brilliant and accomplished physicist; but he was struck down by leukemia at age 45 - hence did not become as notable as he might have. Cheers and thanks for all of your hard work on articles! Bdushaw (talk) 12:11, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

The main thing is that everything needs to be referenced. I have added his doctoral thesis. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Jean Tatlock[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Jean Tatlock at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Andrew D. (talk) 18:31, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Clive Ward[edit]

The article John Clive Ward you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:John Clive Ward for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 02:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

A belated welcome![edit]

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm! Face-smile.svg

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Hawkeye7. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Champion3682 (talk) 06:05, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Tech News: 2017-05[edit]

18:45, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Feynman[edit]

My only remaining question is about that photo with the Swedish PD tag, but it's not a show stopper so I'll ask it here. Given the response by the other person who said it can go to Commons, do you now agree or disagree with him? ie, should it go to Commons or not? HalfGig talk 20:42, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

The image is definitely in the PD. Copyright expired in Sweden, therefore also in the US. But I went through this with James Chadwick. In that case, another (but slightly different) photograph of Chadwick was taken at the same session, but it was published in the UK, and therefore was not in the PD. We had a debate on Commons and the image was kept. Then one of their cowboy admins just deleted it anyway. So the rule is: don't move images to Commons if don't have to. If we do have to, we can substitute the OTRS image (the one in the Physics section) that everyone else uses, but I'd rather not.
It's two other images that are problematic; the one of the CalTech bookstore and the Feynman Lectures on Physics. They are on Commons, so all we can do is remove them from the article. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
I'm no super image license expert, but I'd lean to keeping those two in the article. HalfGig talk 21:13, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for James N. Post III[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 1 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James N. Post III, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Major General James N. Post III flew over 4,000 hours in the F-16 Falcon? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James N. Post III. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, James N. Post III), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:41, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Carl Linnaeus[edit]

I read an article on the web that said this is the most viewed article on wiki, or at least most viewed bio. It's also a Top level article at WP:Plants. I was wondering what you think it'd take to get it to FA. Or as an alternative, who you'd think would be good to take a quick look at it. And congrats on getting Feynman to FA! HalfGig talk 15:45, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Request[edit]

This past July you reviewed and promoted the article on SPARS to a GA. Its talk page indicates this, but the article page does not. Might you consider fixing this apparent ommssion? Thank you. Pendright (talk) 00:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

A Bot is supposed to do that but did not for some reason. I've done it manually. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

CSS styling in templates[edit]

Hello everyone, and sincere apologies if you're getting this message more than once. Just a heads-up that there is currently work on an extension in order to enable CSS styling in templates. Please check the document on mediawiki.org to discuss best storage methods and what we need to avoid with implementation. Thanks, m:User:Melamrawy (WMF), 09:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 February 2017[edit]

Tech News: 2017-06[edit]

19:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXX, February 2017[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of High Explosive Research[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article High Explosive Research you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of High Explosive Research[edit]

The article High Explosive Research you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:High Explosive Research for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for David Hawkins (philosopher)[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 9 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article David Hawkins (philosopher), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an interactive exhibit about the life and work of David Hawkins was called "Cultivate the Scientist in Every Child"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/David Hawkins (philosopher). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, David Hawkins (philosopher)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for John Clive Ward[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 13 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Clive Ward, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Clive Ward has been called "the father of the British H-bomb"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Clive Ward. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, John Clive Ward), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:30, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Tech News: 2017-07[edit]

18:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations![edit]

WPMH ACR (Diamonds).png The Military history A-Class medal with diamonds
For your work in promoting Project Y, Dayton Project, and Ames Project, I am pleased to present you with the A-class Medal with Diamonds. For the Coordinators of the Military history Project. Parsecboy (talk) 01:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Jean Tatlock[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 16 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jean Tatlock, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jean Tatlock had a romantic relationship with Robert Oppenheimer, introducing him to poetry and politics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jean Tatlock. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jean Tatlock), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for High Explosive Research[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 16 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article High Explosive Research, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that whilst carrying out High Explosive Research, British scientists developed atomic weapons? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/High Explosive Research. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, High Explosive Research), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Million award for Featured Article Richard Feynman[edit]

Million award logo.svg The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Richard Feynman (estimated annual readership: 1,160,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Can you help me at FAC?[edit]

King Kalākaua's world tour has stalled after two supports and a couple of pretty hefty reviews. Can you add anything to the review? Either way, thanks. — Maile (talk) 22:20, 17 February 2017 (UTC)