User talk:Headbomb

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
User Talk Archives My work Sandbox Resources News Stats Misc.

The Signpost
14 October 2016

Please do not move DYK nomination pages[edit]

Headbomb, I appreciate that you were trying to help, but please do not ever move DYK nomination template pages as you just did with Template:Did you know nominations/bioRxiv. I know that it should have been named with the capital "R" to begin with, but once a page has been named, it should not be moved, because moving causes other problems. I had already adjusted the page to reflect the discrepancy in naming and its internal templates, and just had to adjust the DYKmake in prep to reflect your move. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:56, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Reason for reversion at fine structure constant?[edit]

Can you please explain your reversion here? Without the scaling factor you arrive at a value many orders of magnitude larger than the correct approximation of 0.0072973525664. Earl of Arundel (talk) 23:12, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Check your math or numbers, because there is no scaling factor in that equation. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 23:17, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
You're right, my mistake. Earl of Arundel (talk) 23:58, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

DYK for BioRxiv[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 7 October 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article BioRxiv, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the second year after its launch, biological preprints hosted on bioRxiv repository were tweeted about on over 20,000 occasions? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, BioRxiv), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

I am displeased[edit]

I don't appreciate your editing while discussion is underway. You don't OWN NJOURNALS. Judging you on your actions does not line up with your words, a fact for which you solely are to blame. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:17, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

@Chris troutman: Then be displeased. See if I care. I'm fully aware that I don't own WP:NJOURNALS, but you would do well to look in the mirror before you demand that the world stops spinning on your account. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 01:20, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
All I'm asking for is clear consensus before changes are made. If consensus disagrees with me, so be it. Your behavior speaks a lot louder than your typing. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:23, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Indeed. I do things. You just obstruct. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 01:27, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Re: Revert[edit]

Hello, I reverted those edits because you changed the comments of other users. Granted, they're not signed, so whether this guideline applies here is debatable, but I erred on the side of it applying. That being said, I don't feel strongly enough about the issue to even *begin* to think of re-reverting at this point. Graham87 06:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)