User talk:Henrikurti

January 2024

Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Gothic War (535–554)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. – DreamRimmer (talk) 17:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: North Epirote Insurgency In South Albania (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:North Epirote Insurgency In South Albania and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Henrikurti! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:04, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: North Epirote Insurgency In South Albania (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Iwaqarhashmi was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:North Epirote Insurgency In South Albania and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waqar💬 14:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Skanderbeg's Serbian Campaign has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Skanderbeg's Serbian Campaign. Thanks! Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:52, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Muzaka-Serbian war

Hello, Henrikurti,

Thank you for creating Muzaka-Serbian war.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add some inline citations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|ARandomName123}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 20:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muzaka-Serbian war for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muzaka-Serbian war, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muzaka-Serbian war until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Demetrios1993 (talk) 12:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not doing an Edit War i'm literally reverting some changes Henrikurti (talk) 13:12, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Skanderbeg's Serbian campaign for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skanderbeg's Serbian campaign, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skanderbeg's Serbian campaign until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Epirus. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 12:38, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Demetrios1993 (talk) 18:04, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of North Epirote Insurgency In South Albania for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North Epirote Insurgency In South Albania, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Epirote Insurgency In South Albania until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Pasha's Invasion of the Pashalik of Berat(1808)

Hello - Thank you for creating the above article! While the title of the article is "Ali Pasha's Invasion of the Pashalik of Berat(1808)", the article opens with "The Invasion of the Pashalik of Berat (1784–1786)". It seems that one should be changed so that the two match. Gjs238 (talk) 15:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Using Wikipedia as a battleground; racism (Special:Diff/1244822690).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:32, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

pls tell when will i get unblocked Henrikurti (talk) 13:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #93248

is declined. We don't tolerate racism here. --Yamla (talk) 20:05, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sorry but can i atleast know when by block will expire. Henrikurti (talk) 14:34, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Henrikurti (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello I am sorry for interupting your time but could you please unblock me because i want to continue creating wikipedia pages and provide as many sources as i can , sorry making a racist comment this will not happen again i know that you don't tolerate racism and if u dont unblock me right now i would like to know atleast when. Thanks for your time and may god bless you. Amen Henrikurti (talk) 20:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Putting an end date on the block does nothing to convince us that the reason for the block will be resolved. That's up to you. As you have found, we have no tolerance of racism here. We're all human beings here, which is a good lesson for life in general, not just Wikipedia, but I digress. There might be some point in the future when you are able to be unblocked, but that's not now or anytime soon. At a bare minimum you'll need to observe the standard offer before requesting unblock, and even then being unblocked is not a guarantee. You'll need to convince us that you will not make racist comments here and find other ways to deal with anger and frustration than attacking people based on human-made categories based on appearance and immutable characteristics. 331dot (talk) 09:31, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't think the user can contribute productively in wikipedia. Besides the comments in question, they also have a history of persistent vandalism, as shown in some of the above discussions, and pov articles. And all that with just around 60 edits in total. Piccco (talk) 22:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea when lifting a block made explicitly also in response to a racist statement (Special:Diff/1244822690) would be appropriate, so I chose "indefinite" (which isn't "infinite" but rather "I have no idea") as the block duration. My state of "I have no idea when lifting this block would be helpful" remains unchanged by your request. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:05, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:NormalguyfromUK per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NormalguyfromUK. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 04:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i am not a sockpuppet noone is controlling me and telling me what to do and idk who tf NormalguyfromUk is Henrikurti (talk) 17:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]