User talk:HomoByzantinus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Some cookies to welcome you! Face-smile.svg

Welcome to Wikipedia, HomoByzantinus! Thank you for your contributions. I am Brookie and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! (Whisper...) 12:54, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

National Union Attack[edit]

Hello HomoByzantinus,

please note that Wikipedia is written from a WP:Neutral Point of View (NPOV). Therefore we describe parties' ideologies not from their own POV, but from the one of neutral, independent scholars and academics. Sources that are closely linked to the subject of the article itself, sources that support or oppose the subject, are not considered neutral. Only independent, third-party sources are considered reliable sources. If you are not sure whether or not a source is considered reliable, you can read the criteria at Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, use the Wikipedia:Reliable sources checklist or let it be checked at the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Or you could just ask another Wikipedian (me, for example) who will be glad to assist you. Thank you for your understanding. Kind regards --RJFF (talk) 01:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I'm RJFF. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Attack (political party), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 00:02, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Attack (political party), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 00:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

April 2013[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Attack (political party). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ----Snowded TALK 10:48, 27 April 2013 (UTC)


Further to the above, please respond on the talk page of the article here. Failure to do so will result in a revert and report for edit warring if you continue ----Snowded TALK 11:45, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 22:31, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  MastCell Talk 17:11, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Ataka[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Attack (political party), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 11:22, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

November 2013[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Attack (political party), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ruby Murray 12:56, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Attack (political party) without thoroughly explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 09:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 24 January[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)