User talk:Hugo999

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Flag of New Zealand.svg This user is a member of WikiProject New Zealand. Coat of arms of New Zealand.svg
Nohat-logo-XI-big-text.png This user is one of the 400 most active Wikipedians of all time.

Categories for discussion[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand/governments[edit]

Hello Hugo999, I note that you have contributed to Wikipedia:WikiProject New Zealand/governments in the past, are you willing to join me in re-creating it? It is no longer in use and New Zealand politics articles in general need substantial improving. Drop me a line if you want to help: There is work to do! Kiwiteen123 (talk) 4 July 2015 T 02:23 (UTC)

New Zealand politics task force[edit]

Flag of New Zealand.svg This user wants you to join WikiProject NZ politics. SIF-Beehive-3-Cropped.jpg

To join the New Zealand politics taskforce, please place the following on your user page:

{{User WikiProject New Zealand/politics}}

New Page Patrol survey[edit]


New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Hugo999! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

CFD talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Hugo999. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 March 9#Categories_for_years_in_French_sport.28s.29.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Burnside High School[edit]

Hello! I am working on the Russian version "Burnside High School" article, which currently has short history section in wikipedia. I am writing you to ask - is there a possibility for you to visit a National Library at Welligton and obtain an electronic copy of book "Choosing the right path : Burnside High School 1960-2010 / Paul O'Connor" (, and put some information into the article? Also I can buy a hard copy of that book. Could you give me an advice, if it's possible? I'll be happy to get any version and any part of that book. Thank you for your time, --Voyagerim (talk) 13:25, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Voyagerim: Will look at the book next Friday at the copy in the National Library, Wellington. Published c2009 according to the listing (despite having 2010 in the title!) probably by a Christchurch bookshop so do not know whether copies would be avaliable now. Likewise re the earlier c1985 book/booklet about the school. PS: The English Wikipedia article seems fairly comprehensive, did you want more details? curious why a Christchurch high (secondary) school has an article on the Russian Wikipedia! Hugo999 (talk) 22:42, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Well I don't think an electronic version is avaliable (though the NZ National Library has many magazines avaliable electronically), but what were you after. John Key was at Burnside High from 1975 to 1979. Hugo999 (talk) 11:25, 28 June 2015 (UTC)


You are receiving this message because a technical change may affect a bot, gadget, or user script you have been using. The breaking change involves API calls. This change has been planned for two years. The WMF will start making this change on 30 June 2015. A partial list of affected bots can be seen here: This includes all bots that are using pywikibot compat. Some of these bots have already been fixed. However, if you write user scripts or operate a bot that uses the API, then you should check your code, to make sure that it will not break.

What, exactly, is breaking? The "default continuation mode" for action=query requests to api.php will be changing to be easier for new coders to use correctly. To find out whether your script or bot may be affected, then search the source code (including any frameworks or libraries) for the string "query-continue". If that is not present, then the script or bot is not affected. In a few cases, the code will be present but not used. In that case, the script or bot will continue working.

This change will be part of 1.26wmf12. It will be deployed to test wikis (including on 30 June, to non-Wikipedias (such as Wiktionary) on 1 July, and to all Wikipedias on 2 July 2015.

If your bot or script is receiving the warning about this upcoming change (as seen at ), it's time to fix your code!

Either of the above solutions may be tested immediately, you'll know it works because you stop seeing the warning.

Do you need help with your own bot or script? Ask questions in e-mail on the mediawiki-api or wikitech-l mailing lists. Volunteers at m:Tech or w:en:WP:Village pump (technical) or w:en:Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard may also be able to help you.

Are you using someone else's gadgets or user scripts? Most scripts are not affected. To find out if a script you use needs to be updated, then post a note at the discussion page for the gadget or the talk page of the user who originally made the script. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Your attention[edit]

Your notification of re-naming is admirable, and my apologies for being slack in responding.

Thanks for your continued efforts in an area of wikipedia few seem interested in - your edits are appreciated. my comments were in the main wrong about the various labels of buddhism, so have moved the comments. Please keep at it! JarrahTree 01:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:Australian real estate agents[edit]

Hi Hugo999. Some time ago I created this category, and recently you created Category:Australian real estate businesspeople, which I would think encompasses my category and is better. Can you see any reason why I should not roll them over into yours? Doug butler (talk) 22:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Possibly no as the category Category:Australian real estate agents is not part of a category by nationality with other nationalities, and the category Category:Australian real estate businesspeople is broader. But there are American and Canadian subcategories in Category:Realtors; and categories for Category:Real estate brokers and Category:Estate agents (people) (which seems to be largely but not entirely British). How about separate categories Category:British real estate agents (new) and Category:Australian real estate agents as subcategories with American and Canadian realtors of Category:Realtors and real estate agents by country/nationality (ie retaining local usage of either realtors or real estate agents). People in the category Category:Real estate brokers could be absorbed into one of these categories; for Americans either Category:American real estate businesspeople (mostly) or Category:American realtors. I could write a proposal for “Categories for discussion” along those lines. NB: The New Zealand Yellow Pages category is “Real estate agents and consultants” though not enough to have a NZ Wikipedia category. For companies there is Category:Real estate companies by country. Hugo999 (talk) 23:59, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
I would think the one category (Real estate businesspeople) is plenty, and as you say, is used internationally. Doug butler (talk) 00:39, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
The category now has zero members. Can I take advantage of your kind offer to have it removed. Doug butler (talk) 11:51, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Well I will schedule it! Hugo999 (talk) 12:39, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Edit on Gun-type nuclear weapon[edit]

I was wondering if you had a source that contradicted that the Soviet Union had not built a gun-type bomb. Your edit here seems to indicate that you feel they did? Or was that a copyedit? Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 02:48, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Re my edit that the Soviets like Britain never built a gun-type atomic bomb, the first Soviet Joe-1 of 1949 was a plutonium implosion bomb (possibly from Groves, will check), though it may be difficult to prove that the Soviets NEVER built a gun-type bomb. The US did have some gun-type uranium bombs apart from the artillery weapons, they were "bunker-buster" bombs which had to penetrate the ground. See Mark 8 nuclear bomb and Mark 11 nuclear bomb Hugo999 (talk) 09:37, 1 July 2015 (UTC)