User talk:Humanengr

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Humanengr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 20:53, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Don't create sandboxes in the wrong namespace[edit]

Please. Barney the barney barney (talk) 19:07, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Apologies if I violated a protocol. I was new to sandboxes. Thanks. humanengr (talk) 21:00, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chroma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

March 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Chesnaught555. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Cogito ergo sum— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ches (talk) 18:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Removed per discussion on my user page. --Ches (talk) 19:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Humanengr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Russian Interference[edit]

Regarding this [1]. Many editors have asked you and others in the small minority that's repeatedly pushing this point to "drop the stick". If you do anything to inflame the talk page and promote further disruption, this is very likely to result in enforcement actions relating to the Discretionary Sanctions. Inviting more editors to further disrupt this page is a very bad idea, and I hope you will not pursue it. SPECIFICO talk 13:20, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Kindly read the proposal I made -- which Geogene actually suggested -- in RfC: Proposed lead section. If Geogene and I can communicate peaceably, and productively perhaps we can as well. Humanengr (talk) 13:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
JFG has given you the same advice I articulated above. So have various editors at the Teahouse. As Obama said to Putin, you will end up blocked if you don't cut it out. SPECIFICO talk 13:47, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
@SPECIFICO: Did you read the proposal I made at JFG's suggestion in the survey section of his RfC? Also pls note re my 'invite' that my intent was to invite YOU and others on your side. (JFG suggested an additional refinement in the Discussion section.) Humanengr (talk) 14:17, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
To my knowledge, none of the editors who oppose your disruptive conduct have a "side" or a POV. SPECIFICO talk 14:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Pls read my proposal (that JFG invited) in the Survey section of the RfC and JFG's further mod in the Discussion section. Humanengr (talk) 14:48, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Why are you pinging me to JFG's page? We both told you not to WP:CANVASS -- that would be a very bad move, and so far you've not done it. Nothing worth belaboring to either of us. SPECIFICO talk 21:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Thx for clarifying that the reference was to 'canvas'. Humanengr (talk) 22:01, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Kindly ignore: {re|SPErCIFICO}} I'm impressed with the volume of your responses. Why did you post here regarding a question I had asked JFG and JFG had already answered? Humanengr (talk) 11:57, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions are in force on an article you have edited[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svg This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.