User talk:Huntster

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
1 2 3 4 5
edit
purge
view
Moderate to high level of vandalism. 5.22 RPM according to APersonBot 00:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Tennessee[edit]

We may need a lock on this article. BrineStans (talk) 15:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

BrineStans, I'm keeping an eye on it now, if they flare back up, I'll put up a temp lock. Huntster (t @ c) 15:59, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Time interval abbreviations[edit]

I noticed a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Wrong/contradictory examples for time durations in "Mixed units" where people are talking about what h/m/s abbreviations should be used. As an example, Ranger 9 is using {{time interval}} as follows.

  • {{time interval|23 Dec 2015, 10:27|3 Jul 2016, 03:48|show=dhm|abbr=on}} → 192d 17h 21m
  • {{time interval|26 Mar 2016, 14:52|14 Jun 2016, 11:43|show=dhm|abbr=on}} → 79d 20h 51m
  • {{time interval|2016-04-10 13:57|2016-05-11 13:19|show=dhm|abbr=on}} → 30d 23h 22m
  • {{time interval|2016-07-20 13:45|2016-08-26 10:11|show=dhm|abbr=on}} → 36d 20h 26m

The template is only used in a handful of pages at the moment, and I have no concern about what abbreviations are used. Moreover, MOS is a guideline only, but if you are aware of articles where the above results are wanted, you might like to comment. I think the lack of a space would cause many MOS people to faint... Johnuniq (talk) 05:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Johnuniq, I tend to not get involved with MOS stuff, and rarely look there...they love tossing around "require this" and "require that", without remembering that it is only a guideline. It's just drama I do not want. If you think following their idea of "min" for minute is appropriate, I'd say go for it, if only so there isn't any future drama. I personally don't use "abbr=on", but use "sep=," to keep things short and orderly. I'm sorry I haven't deployed Time interval to more pages, but I've got a huge backlog of things I'm working on and little time to do them. I do plan on going through all of the Moon missions, etc, at some point and install it, as it *is* the superior template. Huntster (t @ c) 08:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Avoiding the MOS pages seems sensible to me! I have no plans to change anything, regardless of what the current MOS discussion concludes, and just wanted to alert you. No problem about the template—there are lots of things I haven't got around to, and one of them is doing anything much with the date/age modules. Johnuniq (talk) 09:41, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection[edit]

Padlock-blue.svg Hello, Huntster. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Huntster. You have new messages at Talk:Raptor (rocket engine).
Message added 12:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Possible fair use photo of Raptor firing? You are a better judge of that than I am. N2e (talk) 12:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)