User talk:Hut 8.5/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Note that if you want to retrospectively alter your signature, retarget a redirect of other really trivial changes I don't really care. Hut 8.5 17:09, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Hut 8.5! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button Button sig2.png located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! --  Netsnipe  ►  17:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical
Wikimedia.png

Reporting vandalism

Next time someone is vandalising your pages, please report it to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism instead of using {{helpme}}. If harassment continues, please post a message to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents --  Netsnipe  ►  17:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


Thanks for your help 81.86.134.26 17:36, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

(forgot to sign in - Hut 8.5 17:37, 4 September 2006 (UTC))

Proposed deletion

Just a quick note to say that if you agreed with a proposed deletion, you can do also signify this with the {{prod2}} template. In this case, I'm just working on getting the socks banned (User:Che Guvara is already gone, and I hope User:Darth Blinky very soon as well). Cheers --Pak21 16:03, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for that, have just notified User:DarthBinky of this account's activity Hut 8.5 16:04, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

apparently this user is a sock puppet, this would explain a lot (see the Rome Total War online clans page)--James Robinson 16:39, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

I respectfully request that you either provide VALID evidence of your allegation or withdraw it. I am NOT a sockpuppet. Please note that making unfounded allegations such as this can be considered a personal attack. Hut 8.5 16:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Someone removed the prod notice, so I listed it on AFD (my first time doing such, so I hope I did it right). Also, I removed your prod2 notice- that is used to support a prod, not an AFD- AFD agree/disagree should be posted to the AFD discussion page (which is linked at the top of the article). Cheers --DarthBinky 17:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry - should have known. Hut 8.5 17:39, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Hut 8.5 has been bullying me online he deletes any thing i do and has made several allergations aginst me with no evidence i want him banned or im writting to the press about that wiki encourages and protects cyber bullys please excuse my spelling im in a hurry.Ivona onatop 17:43, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

All you have done is make unfounded allegations, remove warnings and vandalise pages, so no wonder... Hut 8.5 17:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Unterseeboot 973

The allegations you made on my talk page are quite frankly ridiculous I ask you to cease and desist I will be fixing the mistake you have made on the u-boat matter, there was no Hoarsefield on that boat he was removed from the front line for cowardice and put on shore. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ivona onatop (talkcontribs) .

The source that I added today confirms that he was on the boat. Hut 8.5 16:59, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Impersonation

You may wish to be aware of this edit, which I suspect wasn't you. Cheers --Pak21 11:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for that - I didn't post it. Hut 8.5 14:34, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the additional accounts: I've added six of them to my list. The rest don't seem to being used abusively, so I've assumed good faith and left them off for now. Cheers --Pak21 15:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

User talk:Hunter91

you recently vandalised my user talk page removing my conversation with some one please fix the dammage, this is your last warning you have done this before next time i will report you. you have taken my page back several versions please fix it you are not admin you are not allowed to do this!Hunter91 15:25, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry about that - I tried to remove some impersonation on your talk page but accidentally removed a few versions. Hut 8.5 15:31, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

National Cipher Challenge

Hi Hut 8.5, just as an idea could we display the winners of the recent National Cipher Challenge and tell what happened for example with the enigma code. And perhaps we could give details of the next cipher challenge being done in the napoleonic times. Oh by the way did you take part in the challenge last year?Cavalier... 15:32, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for this. I suppose we could - when I wrote the article not much of this had happened. I did take part last year and came 14th (under the name of "Hut 8.5"). Hut 8.5 15:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Wow. Well done i bet you must be really pleased. I think it should be alright to list the winners, unless Wikipedia counts it as advertising.. which it shouldn't because it is a notable eventCavalier... 15:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)


Thanks. Go ahead and edit the article yourself, if you like. Hut 8.5 15:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the note on my userpage. Is it alright if i (should) start editing it tonight, only as i need to do a bit of revision for a test i have soonCavalier... 15:49, 7 September 2006 (UTC) Sorry put username in wrong placeCavalier... 15:49, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

You can edit any article whenever you like - no-one owns any of them! Hut 8.5 15:50, 7 September 2006 (UTC)


Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandlaim placed on my discussion pageGeneral Oumrov 17:47, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Unterseeboot 973

I ahev deleted your unteressabot 973 as the navy have reported on the bbc that this ship actually didnt existXenia Onatopp 14:22, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

If you want to delete an article, then please follow the usual deletion procedures. Note that you only deleted a reference to it on my userpage, and not the actual article. If you do try and delete the article then you will need a reference which says that the ship did not exist. Anyway I have several such sources which say it did. Hut 8.5 15:59, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

redirect

Looks good, you may find others find it more convenient too since there is only one page. I have had mine configured this way for a while now. David D. (Talk) 15:51, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

  • I think whoever is vandalising this page read our conversation yesterday, to judge from the vandalism here earlier. I've put the userpage back for now. Hut 8.5 16:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

somebody sent this too me so i'm just spreading it a bit!!!--Boris Johnson VC 19:18, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Hut 8.5 20:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the tip about the user box mate, it did the trick thanks again. Mr Roboto 15:52, 14 September 2006 (UTC)


No problem. Hut 8.5 16:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the vandal count thing and rv ing the vandalism. Mr Roboto 11:57, 16 September 2006 (UTC)


Again, no problem. Hut 8.5 11:58, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

From the desk of MR Anonymous

James is la france by the way not any body eles it was just a trick bye. Anonymous 13:00 16 September 2006 (UTC)


Help

As you have a history of creating U-Boat articals pz could you help me with Unterseeboot 269, the neccisary info is on the talk page. Thanks --Boris Johnson VC 14:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

I've cleaned it up a bit. Hut 8.5 15:35, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the help --Boris Johnson VC 16:40, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Damascus terrorist attacks

What IDIOT wrote that Damascas artical-its full of spelling mistakes-must have been somebody like...SONNY LOL —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.108.187.175 (talk) .


The bloody EU

Do you have too put the EU tag on your userpage...--Boris Johnson VC 10:50, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Any reason why I shouldn't? Hut 8.5 11:02, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes, British supporters of the EU are nothing more than a bunch of traiters. --88.108.200.21 11:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

That's your opinion. Rather interesting that a similar IP has been vandalising this very template? [1]

well they where very naughty wern't they. --88.108.200.21 11:16, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Given that both you and the IP that vandalised the template both seem very anti-EU and most of the digits of the IP are the same (this is a dynamic IP), it would seem that you are one and the same person. Please note that calling me a "traiter" amounts to a personal attack. Hut 8.5 11:19, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


Thank you!

I was about to go report 206.15.138.51 for vandalizing Alcoholics Anonymous when I saw that you'd done it. You're fast! Thank you! RedRollerskate 15:28, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Another Smile

Thanks once again for your help, you deserve another smile --Boris Johnson VC 15:57, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Err... thanks Hut 8.5 15:59, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


User boxes

Thats great thanks --Boris Johnson VC 11:21, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Your welcome to try rearranging it if u like, perhape have one user box for political views and one for everything else...--Boris Johnson VC 11:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

I mean i usebox section for each. --Boris Johnson VC 11:57, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

British International School in Cairo

Hello! I (think I) took care of the NPOV on that page and removed the advert tag on it (after a lot of editing). Looks like just another case school kids having too much fun. Anyways, just wanted to tell you as you put the tag there originally. Cheers and happy editing. Sasquatch t|c 18:29, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

It looks a lot better now. Thanks. Hut 8.5 18:31, 8 October 2006 (UTC)


Wow

I've just joined the Muslims guild lol lol lol --Boris Johnson VC 19:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Might be a good idea - you seem to edit a lot of articles relating to Islamic terrorism. Hut 8.5 19:29, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Crypto Project

Glad to have as a member of the WikiProject Cryptography. You'll probably find your time there amusing (teapot tempests have not been unknown -- at digital Rights Managment, for instance), and interesting. Quite a number of the crypto corner editors are acadmically, or professionally involved in cryptography, one way or another.

The crypto corner can always use more keyboard fingers to revert vandalism, confusion, and misapprehensions. Welcome aboard our project to conquer the world by telling everyone about crypto. ww 02:45, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


Your really flattering me...lol

a very important subject, but whoever wrote the article doesn't seem to have bothered to write much

Feel free to try to fill in 2006 section-the neccissory info is in weblinks 1 and 2. Thanks--Boris Johnson VC 19:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Georges Painvin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Georges Painvin.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:06, 3 November 2006 (UTC)


Vandalism 13 Nov.t

Hi Hut 8.5 -- I have a message from you relating to vandalism stemming from this I.P. Address on Nov13. This is actually a very small high school and I (as a teacher here) was wondering if you could show me the specific act of vandalism. I theorize that the content will help me identify the perpetraitor and hopefully put a stop to the vandalism. Sorry about giving you more to do-- I know these pages get vandalized enough by people with actual axes to grind as a oppossed to bored teenagers. 209.159.63.198 15:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi. I'm not Hut 8.5, but the relevant edits were: diff 1, diff 2, diff 3, diff 4 and diff 5. Hope this helps --Pak21 15:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
At a brief glance, they look right. You can always check the edits made by your IP by looking at your contributions. One of them seems to have been made by a Drew Sibert - do you know him? Hut 8.5 16:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Got him --thanks alot for your help. We are great supporters of Wikipedia and appreciate all your help! 209.159.63.198 20:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

User talk:204.78.125.47

Given the vandalism since your warning, could you just turf them out please? - Vedexent (talk) - 20:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for Reverting to the Correct Version

Thank you for reverting to the the correct version of the The Scarlet Letter article. My VP program bugged and kept reverting to the wrong version. I greatly appreciate it thank you.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 20:36, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Help request

Hi...i'm new 2 wiki, just wondering if i would be allowed to make a page on how the Muslim/Jewish conpirisy has taken over the Christian holy citys?--Sword of Christ 15:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. Hut 8.5 16:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Sock page request

M8 I recomend that u put a link on your page to show people how many edits your socks done!

I really can't be bothered. Hut 8.5 20:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Sword of Christ

For what it's worth, three things convince me he's a sock:

  1. His very first edit was to your user page. I think we know there's group who have done that in the past.
  2. His (now deleted) user page claimed that he was a user in the "North of Italy", but he also edited his user talk page from the IP address 88.108.203.54, which a whois shows is a Tiscali UK address.
  3. He can't spell "delete", consistently spelling it with an extra "a": [2] [3]. This is exactly the same mistake that Major18 made: [4].

Cheers --Pak21 16:19, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

I know he's a sock as I know the guy personally and he has admitted it! Hut 8.5 16:27, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Blocking?!

I don't understand why, but you put something on my user talk page, then deleted it! Why did you say I could get blocked? I am taking this very seriously. If you do this again, you will be blocked from using Wikipedia. Reply on my talk page. 86.20.53.195 22:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

I've done so. Please note that a single mistake is NOT grounds for blocking. Hut 8.5 18:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


Barnstar

Working Man's Barnstar.png The Working Man's Barnstar
Awarded for your tireless efforts reverting vandalism

Damn...

You've sure been vandalized a lot.

I guess people hate you or something...

DE

Yeah.

O okay.

...lolz...

DE

Diligent and multiple vandals

There is too much vandalism to make it funny. You recently reverted a vandalism in Number, but missed that the preceeding author (167.102.162.39, talk) also was vandalising, and so didn't revert all damage. Perhaps you'd like to warn that guy, too.--JoergenB 13:56, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Spelling

No problem at all! I was going to spell check it before i saved the page so greatly appreciated! - Doobuzz 18:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Acton

Why change back the Acton page just now? I thought I'd made it better and had taken into account some of the views on the Acton discussion page. I had been trying to make it more interesting and felt that it wasn't inappropriate. Thanks, Steven.Skealey 18:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Response to welcome

Thanks for the welcome. Just a quick question...is there a specific reason I received it? I see it most commonly on user pages of new users who have made some faux pas—or users who have deliberately vandalized pages (in which case the welcomer is apparently assuming good faith). Since I've been a registered user for almost two years, I can't help but wonder if I'm being called on some mistake. If so, I'd like to know what it is, so I can avoid it in the future. Or maybe I'm reading way too much into this, and you were just being friendly. Teflon Don 03:17, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Please take another look

Hi, In the discussion over deleting List of bow tie wearers you voted to delete and asked "How is this useful?" I took your comment seriously and tried to answer that not only in the discussion afterward but changed the article significantly, which, I think, shows how it is helpful. Please take another look and reconsider. Thanks.Noroton 00:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Talk Vandalism

Thank you for helping to revert the vandalism from Augmon92. IrishGuy talk 19:15, 27 January 2007 (UTC)


Admin

Hut 8.5, you have been a helpful user and you are now also an experienced user, would you like me to nominate you for admin? I think you would make a great admin!!!--Boris Johnson VC 20:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

lol, with an edit like that how could you not see s/he has a sense of humour! Mathmo Talk 03:13, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Hmm, Hut 8.5, I too think you should indeed be nominated. I'm quite experienced with RfA, and from what I've seen of you I think the RfA regulars will be quite impressed. Please reconsider, I think you'd be an asset as an admin. --Majorly (o rly?) 15:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

UKIP

Saying how big a party is whoes primary objective is to get Britain out of the EU is very important in assessing how much support is has in its home country, and hense how strongly held its beliefs are in the UK population, influencing how lightly britain is to pull out of the EU. [5] P.S. The wikipedia artical says UKIP is the biggest political party, and lets NOT have an edit war!!!--Boris Johnson VC 22:15, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar!

I dont know if you care for this, but...

Barnstar of Reversion2.png The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Great job reverting edits and reporting to WP:AIV Corpx 19:03, 13 February 2007 (UTC)