User talk:I'm nonpartisan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

--I'm Nonpartisan 01:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)


Hello, I'm nonpartisan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  W3stfa11/Talk to me 06:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC)


Hmm... I'm not absolutely sure what you want me to do. I'm going to make a few changes. You let me know if that's alright.

Edit: Ok, it turns out you created a subpage under a new username. The subpage you created was called User:I'm Nonpartisan/Userboxes/La Leche League Leader. This is different than your current username, which is User:I'm nonpartison. Notice the capitalization of 'N' in the new page. That's ok. I've moved that page to User:I'm nonpartisan/Userboxes/La Leche League Leader. As you can see, the nonpartison is not capitalized.

For the userbox (ubx), I made the font slightly smaller. I'm not much of a coder myself. ;) I added the ubx to the Health section, as you requested. It's near the bottom. Let me know if you need help in anything else. :) W3stfa11/Talk to me 23:55, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Oh, just for reference, when you leave a comment on a talk page, you should sign your posts. Just a heads up. :) W3stfa11/Talk to me 23:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

No problem. I'm glad I could help. Send any questions my way when you have them. :) Cheers. W3stfa11/Talk to me 05:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

The WikiProject Biography Newsletter: Issue II - April 2007[edit]

The April 2007 issue of the WikiProject Biography newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you BetacommandBot 18:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits to List of Breastfeeding Activists, Educators, Researchers, and Writers[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, I'm nonpartisan! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bmembers\.aol\.com\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 03:24, 25 April 2007 (UTC)


  • I noticed you removed one of your posts in the FAR for Bahá'í Faith and I just hope you don't worry too much about this. It was bound to happen sooner or later. Respond to me if you'd like to chat sometime. :) JuJube 04:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive[edit]

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive!
Crystal personal.png

WikiProject Biography is holding a three month long assessment drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unassessed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2007 – September 1, 2007.

Awards to be won range from delicacies such as the WikiCookie to the great Golden Wiki Award.
There are over 110,000 articles to assess so please visit the drive's page and help out!

This drive was conceived of and organized by Psychless with the help of Ozgod. Regards, Psychless Type words!.


Hello, thanks for your recent additions to the Baha'i House of Worship. Can you please also add the references for the newly added content. Thanks. -- Jeff3000 19:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)


I don't disagree with you about the coverage of Pickett's death, but I think you misread what I was doing. Linkboyz deleted the entire section called "Controversy" with the edit comment "removed unsourced material--please include sources, how do we know any of this is true?" Although I did not write any of that material, I can assure you that as a 25-year resident of Evanston, the section is well-written, accurate and can be sourced through sources like the Chicago newspapers and the Evanston Review. I simply reinstated the entire section with the intent to go back soon and provide sources. I did not add the material back after you deleted it the first time; someone else must have done so since it was back in the article at the time Linkboyz came along. -- DS1953 talk 02:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

I think we are on the same page. I don't think Wikipedia is the place to discuss local political issues in depth (pro or con) but the existence of general issues like development and the controversial role of NU in the community are worth noting in the Evanston article (with sources, of course). -- DS1953 talk 03:59, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5[edit]

To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 15:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC) .


Given that Kevin Locke is still alive, any picture posted on Wikipedia of him has to be under a free license such as the GFDL, or a subset of the Creative Commons licences (such as cc-by-sa). Images under Flickr are not usually under such licences, but if they are, they can be uploaded to Wikipedia. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 05:04, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

You have to be a little careful with Creative Commons licences since some of them are considered free by Wikipedia, and some aren't. For example, this image has a cc-by-nc-nd licence which is not considered free since it doesn't allow commerical use and doesn't allow derivative works. Licences that are cc-by (attribution) or cc-by-sa (attribution and share-alike) are the ones that allowed in Wikipedia. I couldn't find an appropriate one on Flickr, but maybe by contacting the photographers, they will release the image under a suitable licence. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 02:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

WP:CHICAGO survey[edit]


You have been marked as an inactive member of WP:CHICAGO since you have not updated your status at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please correct your status. If you consider yourself a member you may want to get involved in the Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3. Also, if you are a member, be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:49, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Real Truth About Success[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article The Real Truth About Success has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional, and does not meet the general notability guidelines - for inclusion, an article requires significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. I cannot find such coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Chzz  ►  01:02, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of The Real Truth About Success[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated The Real Truth About Success, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Real Truth About Success. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Chzz  ►  11:12, 7 October 2099 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:TheRealTruthAboutSuccess BookCover.png)[edit]


Thanks for uploading File:TheRealTruthAboutSuccess BookCover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Garrison Wynn.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Garrison Wynn.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:31, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Category:Native American Music Award Winner[edit]


I have proposed renaming or deleting Category:Native American Music Award Winner, which you created.

Your comments would be welcome in the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 December 25#Novelists_by_fiction_subject_area, where I have explained the reasons for this proposal. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:33, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Garrison Wynn[edit]

Hello I'm nonpartisan, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Garrison Wynn, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Orangemike. This has been done because the page is a blatant advert that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Orangemike. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Orangemike (talk · contribs) 19:55, 28 January 2010 (UTC)


Hi Candace!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 05:17, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Wilmette Institute[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Wilmette Institute, and it appears to include material copied directly from

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:51, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello Bot, I am the author of both pages, as you can see by my user name and am substantially changing the content for Wikipedia.I'm Nonpartisan 17:58, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Wilmette Institute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bosch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wilmette Institute[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wilmette Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jeff3000 (talk) 16:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomen's Collaborative[edit]

WikiWomen Unite!
Hi I'm nonpartisan! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 03:04, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge[edit]

50k Challenge poster.jpg You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, I'm nonpartisan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)