User talk:I64s/Archive 10

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Terence/N

This is an archive of my talk page. Please do NOT post any new messages here. Instead, post it at my main talk page. Thanks.

upload to wikicommons[edit]

yes please go ahead thanksChensiyuan 11:57, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA (reprise)[edit]

Well, it's been a week now that I've been an administrator and I'd like to take this moment to once again thank everyone who supported my RfA, and to let you all know that I don't think I've screwed anything up yet so I hope I'm living up to everyone's expectations for me. But if I ever fall short of those expectations, I'd certainly welcome folks telling me about it!

Atlant 14:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A belated note - Gary Kirk's RfA[edit]

Thank you very much for your support in my RfA. Unfortunately consensus was not reached, and the nomination was not successful. However, I do appreciate your participation, am still in support of the Wikipedia project, and will continue to contribute without interruption. Thanks again! --Elonka 16:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting my RfA[edit]

Thank you for supporting my RfA that I have passed with 73/2/1.--Jusjih 09:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Meetup[edit]

Thank you for informing me about this. Currently, I cannot make any promises regarding this as I would most likely be working on these two days. However, I would let you know if my real world situation changes. Personally, if given the chance, I would indeed love to have a meet-up with you guys (and girls). --Siva1979Talk to me 16:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiStressed?[edit]

Hey, you're wikistressed? Cheer up, and take a break =D - SpLoT / (talk) 06:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just out of interest, am I still the youngest active SGpedian? - SpLoT / (talk) 06:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for October 30th.[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 44 30 October 2006 About the Signpost

Wales resigns chair position as reorganization underway Hypothetical valuation of Wikipedia scrutinized
Work underway to purge plagiarized text from articles Librarian creates video course about Wikipedia
Report from the Japanese Wikipedia News and notes: Commemorative mosaic started, milestones
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting my RfA[edit]

Thank you for your support in my RfA, which passed with a final tally of (56/0/2). It was great to see so much kind support from such competent editors and administrators as commented on my RfA.

I know I have much reading to do before I'll feel comfortable enough to use some of the more powerful admin tools, so I'll get right to it.

Again, thanks;  OzLawyer / talk  13:14, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My Editor Review[edit]

Hi, I just started an editor review at Wikipedia:Editor review/Jersey Devil and am trying to get feedback on my edits. Feel free to leave a review or comment. Thanks and bye.--Jersey Devil 01:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Could you please not keep yourself logged in when you are away from your machine? Especially if you do end up becoming an admin leaving your account vulnerable could create major damage. JoshuaZ 06:12, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...[edit]

...for your support of my recent RfA. If I can ever be of any help with my fancy new buttons or if you just need a set of disinterested eyes to look at an article. BTW, I'm still waiting for more about Singapore hot dogs, even if they are nothing special, they still belong at hot dog variations :) youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 16:48, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hello, Terence Ong. Can we be friends? Thank you. Acs4b 16:37, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to interrupt but I hope that your wikistress will go down and soon be cured. Have a nice day! Acs4b 17:03, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November Esperanza Newsletter[edit]

Program Feature: Admin Coaching (needs coaches!)
Admin Coaching needs coaches!!! If you are an administrator, or even a generally experienced user, do consider signing up to be a coach.

Admin Coaching, now being coordinated by HighwayCello, is a program for people who want help learning some of the more subtle aspects of Wikipedia policy and culture. People are matched with experienced users who are willing to offer coaching. The program is designed for people who have figured out the basics of editing articles; they're not newcomers any more, but they might want some help in learning new roles. In this way, Esperanza would help keep hope alive for Wikipedia because we would always be grooming the next generation of admins.

What's New?
The Tutorial Drive is a new Esperanza program! In an effort to make complicated processes on Wikipedia easier for everyone, Esperanza working to create and compile a list of tutorials about processes here on Wikipedia. Consider writing one!
A discussion on how Esperanza relates to the encyclopedia has been started; please add your thoughts.
Many thanks to MiszaBot, courtesy of Misza13, for delivering the newsletter.
  • The list of proposed programs has been updated, with some proposals being archived.
  • There is now a new program: the Tutorial Drive! Consider writing a tutorial on something you are good at doing on Wikipedia.
  • The suggestion of adding a cohesive look to all the Esperanza pages is being considered; join the discussion if you are interested!
  • In order to make a useful interlanguage welcome template, those involved in translation projects will be asked what English Wikipedia policies are most important and confusing to editors coming from other language Wikipedias.
  • A discussion of Esperanza's role in Wikipedia is being held, with all thoughts of all Esperanzians wanted!
  • Shreshth91 informed everyone that he will be leaving the Esperanza council as life is rather busy; his spot will be filled by the runner up from the last election, HighwayCello.
Signed...
Although having the newsletter appear on everyone's userpage is desired, this may not be ideal for everyone. If, in the future, you wish to receive a link to the newsletter, rather than the newsletter itself, you may add yourself to Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter/Opt Out List.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superior (proposed state)[edit]

Please see Vanderbilt University source and consider changing your vote. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superior (proposed state) MPS 18:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for November 6th.[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 2, Issue 45 6 November 2006 About the Signpost

Arbitration election campaigns begin Blogger studies Wikipedia appearance in search results
Intelligence wiki receives media attention Report from the German Wikipedia
News and notes: Foundation donation, milestones Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:32, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks[edit]

Thank you for participating in my RfA discussion! I appreciate you contributing your voice to the debate and its outcome. I hope how I wield the mop makes you proud. Thanks!

Thank you for your support![edit]

Se la face ay pale, la cause est...
Se la face ay pale, la cause est...

23:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

If I'm a bit pale in the face now,
it's because of the amazing support
during my recent request for adminship
and because of all those new shiny buttons.

And if in the future
my use of them should not always be perfect
please don't hesitate to shout at me
any time, sunset, noon or sunrise.

RfA thanks[edit]

Hi Terence, and thanks for your participation at the recent RfA, which did not succeed. For those of you who expressed their support, your kind words and your trust are sincerely appreciated. For those who were opposed --especially those who offered their constructive criticism-- please accept this message as assurance that equally sincere efforts, aimed at enhancing the quality and accuracy of representations within the Wikipedia, will continue. Striving for improved collaboration and consensus will also continue, with all of your insights in mind, while applying NPOV ideals as fairly and reasonably as possible. Ombudsman 05:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Hi Terence, even though we haven't interacted, I have seen you active at various forums... Thanks for your support to my recent RFA. Do let me know if I be of any assistance -- Lost(talk) 13:57, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS:My thanks note looks quite drab below all those swank notices but as I said in my RFA, I am technologically challenged...:) -- Lost(talk) 13:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Use of word "vanity" in AFD discussions[edit]

Just a friendly note regarding the use of "vanity" as a reason for deletion. (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Manning). Please instead use "conflict of interest" per the policy pronouncement at WP:COI#Importance_of_civility. Cheers, Jpe|ob 00:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA[edit]

Hi Terence. I wanted to thank you with flowers (well, flower) for taking the time to participate in my RfA, which was successful. I'm very grateful for your support. I assure you I'll continue to serve the project to the best of my ability and strive to use the tools wisely. Please do let me know if I can be of assistance and especially if you spot me making an error in future. Many thanks once again. Yours, Rockpocket 08:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks[edit]

Hi Terence Ong, I am very thankful to you for supporting and comments on my succesful RfA. Shyam (T/C) 06:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks![edit]

My brand-spankin' new mop!
My brand-spankin' new mop!

My RfA done
I hope to wield my mop well
(Her name is Vera)

I appreciate
The support you have shown me
(I hope I don't suck)

Anyway, I just
wanted to drop you a line
(damn, haikus are hard)

EVula // talk // // 16:56, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks[edit]

Thank you for the extra feathers on my wings!

Thank you so much, Terence Ong, for your support in my RfA, which passed on November 11, 2006, with a final tally of 82/0/2. I am humbled by the kind support of so many fellow Wikipedians, and I vow to continue to work and improve with the help of these new tools. Should you have any request, do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Húsönd 21:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks[edit]

Hi Terence, and thanks very much for your support during my recent RfA, which succeeded with a final tally of 64/0/0. I am grateful for the overwhelming support I received from the community, and hope I will continue to earn your trust as I expand my participation on Wikipedia. It goes without saying that if you ever need anything and I can help, please let me know. Wait, I guess it does go with saying. ; ) --cholmes75 (chit chat) 15:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input![edit]

Thank you for taking part in my RfA. The RfA was not successful, mostly because I did a pretty bad job of presenting myself. I'll run again sometime in the next few months, in the hopes that some will reconsider.

In the meantime, one of the projects I'm working on is A Wikimedia Administrator's Handbook. This is a wikibook how-to guide intended to help new administrators learn the ropes, as well as to simply "demystify" what adminship entails. If you are an administrator, please help out with writing it, particularly on the technical aspects of the tools. Both administrators and non-administrators are welcome to help link in and sort all of the various policies regarding the use of these tools on wikipedia in particular (as well as other projects: for example, I have almost no experience with how things work on wiktionary or wikinews). Users who are neither familiar with policy or the sysop tools could be of great help by asking questions about anything that's unclear. The goal is to get everything together in one place, with a narrative form designed to anticipate the reader's next question.

A second project, related but not entailed, is a book on wikimedia in general, with a history of how various policies evolved over time, interesting trivia (e.g., what the heck was "wikimoney" about?), and a history of how the wikimedia foundation itself came about and the larger issues that occurred during its history (such as the infamous "Spanish Fork").

Again, thanks for your input on the RfA, and thanks in advance for any help you might be able to provide for the handbook. --SB_Johnny|talk|books 14:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE:IM[edit]

Yes, I have a Messenger account; however, I'd also like to think that I have some form of a social life, and I'd rather not have Wikipedia invade my personal life as such. So I'm going to have to decline your request - but you could always drop me an email if there are any pressing issues. Thanks! -ryand 17:51, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for November 13th.[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 2, Issue 46 13 November 2006 About the Signpost

Full accessibility, dramatic growth reported for Chinese Wikipedia ArbCom elections: Information on Elections
Report identifies Wikipedia as a leader in non-US traffic News and notes: Board passes four resolutions, milestones
Wikipedia in the News Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:28, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two weeks ago I couldn't even spell administratur and now I are one (in no small part thanks to your support). Now that I checked out those new buttons I realize that I can unleash mutant monsters on unsuspecting articles or summon batteries of laser guns in their defense. The move button has now acquired special powers, and there's even a feature to roll back time. With such awesome new powers at my fingertips I will try to tread lightly to avoid causing irreversible damage and getting into any wheel wars. Thanks again and let me know whenever I can be of use.
~ trialsanderrors 06:34, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Thanks[edit]

Thanks!
Thanks for your input on my (nearly recent) Request for adminship, which regretfully achived no consensus, with votes of 68/28/2. I am grateful for the input received, both positive and in opposition, and I'd like to thank you for your participation.
Georgewilliamherbert 06:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

b-day[edit]

I know this is early but... == A Happy Birthday From Randfan ==

Dear {{subst:BASEPAGENAME}},

The Wikipedia Birthday Committee, myself, and Bearly541 wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy your special day. Hooray! --Randfan please talk talk to me!

This guy is your personal B-day red panda! Congrats for being one year older and staying with Wikipedia this long. Much too many people create new accounts, do a few minor edits, and just quit. Happy B-day! —¡Randfan! {{subst:CURRENTTIME}}, {{subst:CURRENTDAY}} {{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC); so how does it feel? :)
Happy b-day! Hope it's a good one! Cheers!:)Randfan!! {{subst:CURRENTTIME}}, {{subst:CURRENTDAY}} {{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)
My happy birthdays here! --Ginkgo100 talk · e@ 05:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Happy birthday! Enjoy your day! Jam01 06:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A birthday Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar from Hildanknight[edit]

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
For the past few months, you have been an excellent Wikifriend, consistently offering me advice and support when I most needed it. Your birthday is the best time for me to express my gratitude to you. J.L.W.S. The Special One 04:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday![edit]

I hope your cake is as delicious!


I know we haven't known each other for long, but in that time you've been nothing but friendly, helpful and hardworking. Your passion hasn't gone unnoticed. On this special day, I'd like to wish this quintessential user a very happy birthday, and good luck for his *ahem* future wikiendeavours ;D - SpLoT / (talk) 10:06, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- SpLoT / (talk) 10:06, 17 November 2006 (UTC) [reply] Steveo2 11:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HAPPY BIRTHDAY[edit]


Happy birthday Terence! I hope you have a good day, and that you enjoy your (big) cake. | AndonicO Talk | Sign Here 14:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]


Hey Terence, a very Happy Birthday to you! Enjoy your day :D --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 15:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A bit late, but Happy Birthday nonetheless! —Goh wz 17:13, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks[edit]

Thank you for the Support

I'd like to express my huge thanks to you, Terence Ong, for your support in my recent RfA, which closed with 100% support at 71/0/1. Needless to say, I am very suprised at the huge levels of support I've seen on my RfA, and at the fact that I only had give three answers, unlike many other nominees who have had many, many more questions! I'll be careful with my use of the tools, and invite you to tell me off if I do something wrong! Thanks, Martinp23 14:34, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And a belated happy birthday! Martinp23 14:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support![edit]

A week ago I nominated myself, hoping to be able to help Wikipedia as an administrator as much as a WikiGnome. I am very glad many others shared my thoughts, including you. Thank you for your trust! Be sure I will use these tools to protect and prevent and not to harass or punish. Should you feel I am overreacting, pat me so that I can correct myself. Thanks again, and happy birthday – better late than never! ReyBrujo 19:10, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

afd for airline destinations[edit]

Someone renominated airline destinations for afd. Since you voted keep last time, I thought you might be interested. DB (talk) 20:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're Welcome[edit]

Oh, you are welcome. I wasn't expecting a thank you note, you are very kind. Thank you for your trouble. | AndonicO Talk | Sign Here 21:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also would like to thank you for your message. I really enjoy giving out nice things, and to get some thanks for it was really good. Best wishes, Jam01 08:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup and AfD[edit]

I reconfirm that I will not be coming on 24 November due to exams.

Regarding WCC, it houses government offices and shops. That's true. But I still fail to see its notability in the worldwide context. Kimchi.sg 04:21, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any mention of a wet weather contingency plan on the meetup page. Better have one, because the afternoon weather has been completely predictable this week - rainy. Kimchi.sg 13:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Security of your account (or lack thereof)[edit]

Just when I thought this and this were the last edits you'd let your friends make while you were "away at lunch", just 5 days ago you made this edit which was a mix of good addition and sneaky vandalism. Apart from your subsequent edit summary, I had no way of telling whether it was really you who made that edit.

Please, please, please, get into the habit of locking your computer whenever you leave it untouched, even if you are going away for just one minute. You can lock your computer in less than one second by pressing Windows Key + L. If I see you making another edit which appears to be even slightly vandalistic I may have no choice but to block your account indefinitely, the same treatment as given to those who disclose their passwords on their user pages or otherwise compromise the security of their accounts. Regards, Kimchi.sg 04:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What a lousy threat! I really hate it when contributors are treated in this manner. The threat of ban is totally unwarranted; those edits were just pranks on the user's namespace, probably by his friends. To threaten with an indefinite ban is ridiculous and abusive. --Vsion 07:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Terence, I suggest you lock your computer while you are away. You cannot afford to leave your account open for other people to commit vandalism with. However, Kimchi – I would suggest that you tone down that warning. Indef-block makes it sound like an abuse. — Nearly Headless Nick {L} 12:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Struck out. Kimchi.sg 08:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for November 20th.[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 2, Issue 47 20 November 2006 About the Signpost

One week later, Wikipedia reblocked in mainland China Military history dominates writing contest
News and notes: Wikibooks donation, milestones Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks[edit]

I would like to express my appreciation of the time you spent considering my successful RfA. Thankyou Gnangarra 13:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

forgot[edit]

oh yeah, you told me before. shall do so from now on. would take of the backlog. thanks. Chensiyuan 07:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Opus Dei RFC[edit]

In answer to your question on the AFD discussion, yes, Opus Dei members seem to actively be inserting propagandistic/"brochure" style material into Wikipedia. There are 5-6 single-purpose accounts who have hundreds of edits, but not a single one unrelated to Opus Dei. There's been a history of puppetry on Opus Dei topics-- for example, when the Opus Dei article was trying to be nominated as a FAC, there were 3-4 users who "suddenly showed up" and voted for Opus Dei as their first or second edit.

There's actually been a big edit war going on with regard to that today. After lots of NPOV problems, I have recently done a major rewrite on the Opus Dei article-- but it's been getting reverted by the OD promoters and driving me bonkers! lol. I'm now requesting comments on the talk page. Could you look over the page and comment on whether the rewrite is an improvment and maybe help out in the ensuing discussion? --Alecmconroy 14:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for you help out lately on that. It seems like there's a pretty strong consensus that the rewrite is an improvement (11 our of 11 outside views), so, hopefully that's settled. There's a slightly different debate ongoing right now about whether or not the improvement introduced NPOV problem. If you have a second, could you look it over and offer your opinion on whether that's the case? --Alecmconroy 15:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[1] is an interesting addition, the article being about the UK television station (1955-1968) that mentions, in passing, Overseas Rediffusion.

I'd agree that O-R needs an article to itself (a sad lack of sources last time I tried) but putting the SGpedian's template on the existing article seems a bit, well, wrong, on so many levels.

In my opinion only. Your mileage may differ :o) ЯEDVERS 19:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support[edit]

I wasn't going to send thank-you cards, but the emotional impact of hitting WP:100 (and doing so unanimously!) changed my mind. So I appreciate your confidence in me at RFA, and hope you'll let me know if I can do anything for you in the future. Cheers! -- nae'blis 23:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for November 27th.[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 2, Issue 48 27 November 2006 About the Signpost

Arbitration Committee elections: Candidate profiles Steward elections begin
Group apologizes for using Wikipedia name in online arts fundraiser News and notes: 1.5 million articles, milestones
Wikipedia in the News Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh cropped.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh cropped.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 09:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA[edit]

Oh, the humanity!

I had my doubts about a second RfA, but even I couldn't have predicted the way it caught fire and inexorably drifted to the ground in flames, causing quite a stir on its way down. Still, it was encouraging to see the level of support and confidence. Thank you for yours, and I hope I'll still have it the next time around. Kafziel Talk 13:14, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks[edit]

Thank you for voting in my RfA, I passed. I appreciate your input. Please keep an eye on me(if you want) to see if a screw up. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 16:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

has been tagged for deletion. care to voice your views on the talk page? thanks. Chensiyuan 17:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations![edit]

You've created the 1 millionth Wikimedia Commons file! - SpLoT (*T* C+u+g+v) 10:43, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
On my method of working this out: When I noticed that the statistics were showing over 1,000,000 media files, I refreshed both the stats page and the "recent uploads" page simultaneously, counting back the dozen or so files to find yours there (so, say it was showing 1,000,023 files, I checked the 24th from the top). I did this multiple times, and yours came out each time. Therefore, it's very likely that yours was it. :) Daveydweeb (chat/review!) 11:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Haha! Congrats on your one minute of fame! —Goh wz 12:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Let our meeting time be constant[edit]

On 30 November 2006 at 4.36 pm (SST), you changed the meeting time on Wikipedia:Meetup/Singapore 3 such that it was brought forward by half an hour to 11.30 am [2]. I had some thoughts on the change; please visit the meetup's talk page. Thanks. —Goh wz 13:51, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Just a quick note to say thanks for your support on my recent RfA. It became clear very quickly that my editing background was going to detrimental to my nomination. Having seen other recent RfA's fail once one or two admins opposed and others just piled on the vote, I decided it would save the ignominy if I withdrew my nomination. I don't intend to change the work I do as it's what I enjoy, so it'll be unlikely I'll apply again. Anyway thanks again for taking the time to review my nomination and giving your support. Regards Khukri (talk . contribs) 11:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore Airlines fleet[edit]

Please do not change the Singapore Airlines page. It is in the correct format and the way the other people who changed it had it layouted was incorrect! We are trying to compromise which fleet table we want to use for Wikipedia and so far, this is the most popular table, which is why I created it for Singapore Airlines. The way it was was also hard to read!--Golich17 17:30, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]