User talk:IExistToHelp/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

April 2017

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Hetkhamar. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 22:38, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for lying about making mistakes, pretending someone else was using your computer, wasting people's time. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 15:21, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

You apparently think we're idiots, and you can blame your mistakes on someone who wandered by your unattended computer to do the same kind of thing that you admit to doing yourself 5 minutes previously. You are wasting people's time, and the benefit to the project of having you help out does not outweigh the cost. I'd suggest at a minimum no one unblock this account until they've admitted to the lying, and agreed to stay away from NPP for 3-6 months. At a minimum. Personally, I would not unblock you until you've matured 3-4 years. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:24, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IExistToHelp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok, I promise not to do NPP for a year. I also promise not to "hat collect" anymore. To get this over with, I admit that I was responsible for this myself and that I can't blame it on others. I admit that I have created User:IExistToHelp the Second, in case this happens. Ok, maybe some of the details I said was fake like using the restroom and it was an orchestra practice(it was actually a birthday party) and I did not take track of my stuff, but although it was true that two other people did the job, I will take full responsibility. I am sorry for lying, but I only wanted to help and improve Wikipedia. I swear that this will never happen ever again.It's IExistToHelp talk 23:18, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have demonstrated incredibly clearly we cannot trust you. Yamla (talk) 23:47, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IExistToHelp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First, to start off, I apologize to User:Jacktime34 for warning him unnecessarily. I am not saying that you must unblock me, but please read what I have to say and take in what I'm going to say. I promise to not do NPP for a year, longer than what Floquenbeam asked. I know my actions would make many think that I'm not trustworthy, but I only joined Wikipedia a while ago. On my first edit, nobody cared to give me any useful links and warned me instead[[1]]. I did not get any notice, and was warned straight ahead. I was inexperienced at the time and did not understand Wikipedia's guidelines. I would like to thank User:Mifter for giving me advice on how to change my username[[2]] and gave me other suggestions. Nobody else did. I was offered to join Kudpung's anti-vandalism class[[3]] and he never had enough room. I left Wikipedia for a while and nominated DJ Bomer for speedy deletion and this is what I got[[4]]. I had a long battle against St. Claires Fire which was identical to the one with Jacktime34[[5]][[6]]. They were asking me why a page about how bad Trump and Kim Kardashian is isn't an attack page. The fight with Jacktime34 made no sense. How was it not vandalism? He only wrote, "there was a fight between pro-trumps and not pro-trumps" and had no resources on it. I would think that it was vandalism due to the reasons, but not User:Sakura Cartelet[[7]] and then she went to report me [[8]]. See, no matter what I do, someone always disagrees with me. Then, when users like User:PogingJuan request for more than three permissions at a time, they get accepted. But, when I only request two, I get called a hat collector? What is this logic? See, I don't think you're idiots. I respect you User:NeilN, User:Floquenbeam and User:Yamla, but apparently you all don't respect me. Duh, you're smart if you are admins. I was just telling the truth, being honest, but honesty failed. User:Beeblebrox declined my autopatrolled request just because I didn't answer his question in a way that didn't make sense. He asked me, "How are you going to improve Wikipedia with this right?". How on earth are you supposed to answer that in a way that would make sense? Then, when I do, he says,"No, your answer makes no sense. Autopatrolled does not take the work away from...". Then, why in the world does it say in the description that Autopatrolled was to take the work of New Page Reviewers? No, my point isn't," My block was not fair", it was to inform you about all the trouble I had to go through, my story. You don't have to unblock me right now, you could listen to Florequenbeam and unblock me three years later. I want to improve Wikipedia, make it trustworthy, make it so my teachers don't say, "Wikipedia is not trustworthy. Don't use it." This was why I joined Wikipedia in the first place, to make it trustworthy and reliable for students and teachers. It's IExistToHelp talk 23:07, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The standard offer approach could be applied to this case. PhilKnight (talk) 23:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@PhilKnight: Does this mean I should contact you after six months? It's IExistToHelp talk 23:36, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

You should make an appeal after 6 months. PhilKnight (talk) 23:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

@PhilKnight: So in October is what you're saying. It's IExistToHelp talk 23:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes. PhilKnight (talk) 23:39, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Info for future admin reviewers

This user was still pretending to be someone else in an autoblock unblock request 20 minutes before this last unblock request here.

--Floquenbeam (talk) 00:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

@Floquenbeam: Now, you're just blaming me for everything that happens at this IP address. It doesn't mean that I created the two accounts above that I am them. It's IExistToHelp talk 22:58, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of One Paseo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on One Paseo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Blueclaw (talk) 01:28, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

One Paseo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, One Paseo, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:12, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Potato Chip Rock

Hello, IExistToHelp. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Potato Chip Rock, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Salimfadhley (talk) 22:59, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Stanley M. Burstein

Hello, IExistToHelp,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Stanley M. Burstein should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley M. Burstein .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Salimfadhley (talk) 22:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Jasmine Stiles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jasmine Stiles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasmine Stiles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Salimfadhley (talk) 23:12, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Mentorship

Your 6 months is almost up (in 12 days it will be) so I feel like I should put forward an offer of mentorship. If you can demonstrate your incident won't happen again then an admin might consider to unblock you, possibly with restrictions. J 947^{^{^{( c ) ^(m)}}} 21:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:One Paseo concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:One Paseo, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:One Paseo

Hello, IExistToHelp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "One Paseo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:02, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

IExistToHelp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20747 was submitted on Feb 28, 2018 00:24:04. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:24, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Don't create sockpuppet accounts to evade your block (User:Weekssonia). Don't ping me from the sockpuppet account for no reason, I'm not going to turn a blind eye to it. When it has been a year since your original block (18 April), I'll restore your ability to edit your talk page to request an unblock. You should really study WP:Guide to appealing blocks between now and then, so you can make your best case, as we won't be responding to multiple inadequate unblock requests again. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:26, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
As you've created another sock, you will need to wait 6 months to appeal. When you have done that, you may communicate with the community via WP:UTRS, as you seem to already know, given the UTRS banner above. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:00, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Category:Animals of Central America has been nominated for discussion

Category:Animals of Central America, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 06:02, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

IExistToHelp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22645 was submitted on Sep 13, 2018 04:28:51. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:28, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IExistToHelp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to update the Canyon Crest Academy page and also the Lord of the Flies pages. That will be it, thank you. It's IExistToHelp talk 03:45, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Also, quick question: Do you think that Wikipedia is a good source to cite for your homework? Thanks. Also want to thank Boing! said Zebedee. I promise that I will not patrol any new pages or perform any other nonsense that I have previously done. I was pretty immature in middle school and I think that my behavior was really stupid, also shouldn't have told my friends to make Wikipedia accounts or gave them my password either-User:GAMTWMV was one of my friend's account. That one friend moved back to Korea and his name was Jin. --It's IExistToHelp talk 03:49, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It appears that you are still editing while logged out, as below. Due to this, we are unable to unblock your account at this time. SQL ^{Query me!} 07:42, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I Sincerely Apologize

I sincerely apologize for my past actions on Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. I swear that I will misbehave anymore or create any more accounts. Also, most of my new accounts were not used abusively, I have seen that having multiple accounts is okay. Yet, a majority were only blocked for being my accounts not because I used them abusively, which I didn't(I didn't pull off a User:INeverCry and create the accounts to help me get admin).

Thank you--It's IExistToHelp talk 03:56, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Please list all accounts that you’ve previously used. Given your responses in UTRS, I’m not convinced this should be lifted. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:00, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for acknowledging these. I have no other comments, but did want to ask about them given the UTRS. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:17, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Honestly, to me, looking through CU and the history, it appears you haven't given us the full list. That and your still editing logged out, evading your ban, even when it's only a single edit. And that was just two days ago. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:37, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

@DeltaQuad:, @SQL:It was an outdated fact about Canyon Crest Academy. I mean, if you would prefer incorrect information over me fixing it, go ahead. I go to Canyon Crest Academy and I saw that the Canyon Crest Academy page was outdated. So I fixed it using the facts they(my principal) gave me. If you think that the facts I fixed were incorrect, you can email the principal since that is where the facts came from and ask him to look at the page. Plus, if I were evading my ban, I could just literally edit on any device that I didn't use Wikipedia on instead of this one. I can go to my friend's house(he lives near me) and edit as well. But I didn't.--It's IExistToHelp talk 17:16, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

We would rather you stop violating WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. If that means leaving incorrect information in place for a little while until another editor comes along to correct it, that's fine. --Yamla (talk) 17:36, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

So I can't even fix outdated info anymore just cuz I'm blocked?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IExistToHelp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to update the Canyon Crest Academy page and also the Lord of the Flies pages. That will be it, thank you. --It's IExistToHelp talk 17:20, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Also, quick question: Do you think that Wikipedia is a good source to cite for your homework? Thanks. Also want to thank Boing! said Zebedee. I promise that I will not patrol any new pages or perform any other nonsense that I have previously done. I was pretty immature in middle school and I think that my behavior was really stupid, also shouldn't have told my friends to make Wikipedia accounts or gave them my password either-User:GAMTWMV was one of my friend's account. That one friend moved back to Korea and his name was Jin. Also, you declined my unblock request for one edit and that edit was updating the Canyon Crest Academy page and if you think I'm vandalizing, please email the school and have them look at the page. --It's IExistToHelp talk 17:20, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

By editing while logged out, you've demonstrated you have no intention at this time to abide by our policies and guidelines. Given your significant violations of WP:SOCK, there are no grounds for unblocking you at this time. Your best hope is to apply under WP:SO which requires zero edits (via any account, or via editing while signed out) for at least six months. At that point, you'll have to convince us you understand why your behaviour was wrong and convince us you won't continue with your bad behaviour. Yamla (talk) 17:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: I haven't made a new account in a while. Also, I wasn't trying to evade my block. That was not my intention at all! I'm not a super psychologist so how am I supposed to convince anyone whose first instinct is to not believe me? You made this extremely unfair against me, I have already stopped making new accounts and using any other account besides this and Kong of Lasers(because I keep on getting emails from Wikimedia Commons). As for evading, I have literally put I am IExistToHelp on all my userpages and talk pages. --It's IExistToHelp talk 18:27, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

You can convince people by not violating WP:EVADE. Starting now. --Yamla (talk) 11:57, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) IExistToHelp, you seem to misunderstand what "evade" means. You evade your block every time you edit a Wikipedia article or talk page, any Wikipedia page at all except for this user talk page, as long as you are blocked. It has nothing to do with whether you are upfront about your block evasion or not. It has nothing to do with whether your edits are constructive or not. Obviously, if you start trolling or vandalising or creating socks for the sake of deception, that would also be unacceptable, but not because it would be more evading than what you have been doing now. It looks like you didn't know that, but now you do, so re-read the decline reason above and please follow the recommendations there. --bonadea contributions talk 13:19, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

@Yamla: Can you please block my ip addresses for a year thank you. --It's IExistToHelp talk 22:59, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

I don't know your IP addresses. --Yamla (talk) 12:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Ok, then.--It's IExistToHelp talk 00:18, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi everyone--It's IExistToHelp talk 03:13, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi SQL ^{Query me!} 03:34, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

TPA

By now you know the drill: since you’re just using your talk page to mess around and abuse the unblock process, I’ve revoked your ability to use it. You can appeal using WP:UTRS. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:10, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

IExistToHelp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22772 was submitted on Sep 26, 2018 02:15:17. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 02:15, 26 September 2018 (UTC)