User talk:ISTB351

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Speedy deletion declined: Victor Giurgiu[edit]

Hello ISTB351. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Victor Giurgiu, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:28, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited R v Gnango, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited 2011 England riots, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Saunders (judge) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited R v Huhne and Pryce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reading (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

R v Huhne and Pryce[edit]

Thank you for your message regarding the sources of my edits on R v Huhne and Pryce. The legal arguments did in fact start on 14 January, as confirmed by court lists. It is the trial concerning the facts that starts next week. Therefore before you call my edits "simply factually untrue assertions", please get your own facts straight! :P

Secondly, can you explain your claim that "court lists can only be used in rare circumstances"? As official government reports, aren't these reliable enough to be included on their own (for example, many Wikipedia articles on legal precedents simply reference the official court reports)? I doubt that they can truly be called "primary" sources. Court lists are provided by HMCS on a separate website; they are not written by the parties involved in the event. The Wikipedia guide that you pointed me towards does not include any reference to court lists that backs up your assertion.

Furthermore, you say "Whenever any kind of analysis is offered, a third party independent and secondary source must be given". I don't understand why you have said this. Both the fact that the trial started on 14 February and the fact that an order has been issued under the Contempt of Court Act were taken directly from the court lists. That's not 'analysis'; it's facts as reported in the sources.

(Disclaimer: I am not familiar with editing on Wikipedia so if I have honestly misunderstood something please do correct me!) 79.77.211.188 (talk) 18:13, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Replied at IP talk. ISTB351 (talk) (contributions) 02:50, 29 January 2013 (UTC)