User talk:I enjoy sandwiches/Archive 1

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Plumpy Humperdinkle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Disambiguation link notification for September 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Double bubble (radiology)

added a link pointing to Omentum

Neonatal bowel obstruction

added a link pointing to Anal sphincter

Umbilical line

added a link pointing to Umbilicus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ovarian cyst[edit]

You added this ref

Rubinstein, A; Letov, O; Landau, E; Goldbourt, U; Reisin, LH (May 1991). "Fatty acid composition of adipose tissue in Ethiopian immigrants: a prospective study during their first year in Israel". Israel journal of medical sciences. 27 (5): 255–9. PMID 2050506.

Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:15, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well that clearly has nothing to do with the article. I'll figure it out and correct, thanks. Plumpy Humperdinkle (talk) 19:42, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am somewhat uneasy that the section "Benign ovarian cysts are common in unsymptomatic premenarchal girls..." landed so far down under epidemiology. While it can be viewed as a kind of epidemiologic information it has also aspects important for diagnosis, prognosis and management. The different aspects are not easy to separate here. Richiez (talk) 22:55, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I struggled a bit with how to manage the paragraph as well. I will try rearranging. If you have additional thoughts, please feel free to reorganize as well. Although I have done minor work on the article, the majority of it was from James. Plumpy Humperdinkle (talk) 03:01, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Much better now. Still don't like the heading "epidemiology" for a section which currently describes prevalence of something that is not a disease or condition. Richiez (talk) 11:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shine On, Harvest Moon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Friars Club. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pancreatic cyst, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serous cystadenoma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cripple[edit]

Use of the word cripple is now avoided as it is generally considered pejorative. Please do not continue to add it to articles. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 19:15, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To which article are you referring? Plumpy Humperdinkle (talk) 04:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, Viriditas made a mistake. The word "cripple" was added (or more accurately, the word "crippled" was modified) in the article The Prestige (film) by an anonymous IP in July here. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm certain that the ever-competent Viriditas will be popping by to apologise for his majorly incompetent edit, any time soon. It appears that he spends the majority of his time lurking around noticeboards and criticising others rather than improving Wikipedia and its content. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't really matter who added it, just that it continued to be used in the diff I saw in recent changes. The user could have removed it from that revision but did not. Just as you could have fixed an ITN error but chose to attack the editor reporting it instead. Funny how you are drawn to the same disputes, over and over again. Viriditas (talk) 21:53, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of curt discontent on this website these days. Perhaps it is part of the evolution of the encyclopedia needing to have an atmosphere of self-criticism as new articles decline, and we turn to refining the old ones. If the purpose of your comment was to let me know that every time I see a pejorative use of the word cripple, I have a duty to remove or reword -- thanks, I will keep an eye out. Please let me know which article next time. I enjoy sandwiches (talk) 09:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed there is, most of it spews from one or two certain individuals who frequent ANI all too often. With regard to the word "cripple", I note that Viridtas didn't and still hasn't made the change himself. How ironic. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:14, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Anatomy Wikiproject![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:

Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
We write for a general audience. Every reader should be able to understand anatomical articles, so when possible please write in a simple form—most readers do not understand anatomical jargon. See this essay for more details.

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! --Tom (LT) (talk) 04:32, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. I enjoy sandwiches (talk) 11:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Triquetral bone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Avulsion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CSD[edit]

Hi, when tagging new articles for CSD, please also set it as reviewed. It saves everyone else time if we can just skim past the already-nominated 2 word articles. Thanks, Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:34, 5 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Ok, will do, thanks for the suggestion. I enjoy sandwiches (talk) 10:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A club sandwich for you![edit]

	The sandwich lovers' username award
	I too enjoy sandwiches. Heck, I've even written articles (Tomato sandwich) and (Cheese and tomato sandwich) about 'em! While you nosh this award, please do remember not to nosh on teh new sandwich fans. Shirt58 (talk) 11:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the sandwich Shirt58. If you are referring to Prakasaraopalem, I believe I misunderstood their attempt at wikicode as gibberish. I am relatively new as well, and did not intend a breach of etiquette. Thank you for the reminder. I enjoy sandwiches (talk) 20:33, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, and I apologise: at the very same time I mentioned WP:BITE, I did just that in chomping on you.

As mitigating circumstances, I would cite your ongoing contributions about stuff I wouldn't have a clue about as convincing me you knew about Wikipedia's labyrinth of policies and guidelines beforehand. Also, I am intermittently somewhat bonkers.

Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:59, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I appreciate the guidance. I enjoy sandwiches (talk) 13:13, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chest radiograph, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Interstitial, Carina and Lingula. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Sayed Haider. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This was self-induced -- I initially entered the template for Afd via Twinkle, then changed it to a db. Before I could do so, Afd template had already been entered. I enjoy sandwiches (talk) 17:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletions[edit]

Hello, I enjoy sandwiches. I notice you are placing speedy deletion tags on articles without notifying the creator/major editors. This is essential. See Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion for instructions. Espresso Addict (talk) 17:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see, I will make sure to do that in the future, thank you. I enjoy sandwiches (talk) 17:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello , I enjoy sandwiches, I am respectfully contesting the speedy deletion flag of the entry Tamarl.The name is a unique name from the island. Multiple elders of the native land have confirmed the authenticity of the meaning of this name. The name is only used in that specific region as it's use has not been widely spread due to its relatively recent origin. Please reconsider the flag for deletion. It has been quite a journey discovery of this name. It will mean a lot to the carrier's of the name considering there exists no record of its translation. Thank you for your consideration. Adegoode (talk) 01:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Root canal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Buccal and Lingual. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contest to removal of 'Tamarl' wikipedia entry[edit]

The name is a unique name from the island. Elders of the native land have confirmed the authenticity of the meaning. The name is only used in that specific region as it's use has not been widely spread due to its relatively recent origin. Please reconsider the flag for deletion. It has been quite a journey discovery of this name. It will mean a lot to the carrier's of the name considering there exists no record of its translation. Thank you for your consideration. Adegoode (talk) 01:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adegoode, your article needs reliable third party references. Please discuss on article talk page. I enjoy sandwiches (talk) 02:52, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors![edit]

please help translate this message into the local language

The Cure Award

In 2015 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs, and we would love to collaborate further.

Thanks again :) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I enjoy sandwiches (talk) 05:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Endodontic therapy

added a link pointing to Coronal

Nuss procedure

added a link pointing to Costal

Transient synovitis

added a link pointing to Medial

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Congenital pulmonary airway malformation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trimester. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elbow, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Trochlea and Apophysis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ozone therapy. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 19:03, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alex, unfortunately your warning is unwarranted and applies to your own behavior more than my own. You reverted my edits without responding to the discussion I started on the talk page. Please continue further discussion there. Ies (talk) 07:37, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies[edit]

I initially was going to move the content in question. Than noticed it was all based on primary sources and did not move it. Apologies. Please read WP:MEDRS wrt sourcing. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:41, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was a little disappointed at first, but I thought about it and you were right to delete it, and you did explain it properly in the edit summaries (when you referenced the WP manual of style) which I should have reviewed more carefully, especially as I believe I made a similar sourcing error on an article in the past that you similarly corrected. Thanks for the follow up note. Ies (talk) 07:37, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mandibular fossa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Posterior. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ossicles[edit]

Hi ies - I put the file in additional images to acknowledge that it wasn't an outright reject of your image - just needs info. cheers --Iztwoz (talk) 20:52, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the follow up note iz. I removed the relocated image from additional images as I would like to put labels on it and resubmit it. I will be doing some major reworking of the article this week. Ies (talk) 05:14, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the article. Ies (talk) 23:21, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, I enjoy sandwiches. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I enjoy sandwiches. You have new messages at Talk:Maltipoo.
Message added 17:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Alice King[edit]

I urge you to withdraw the nomination of Alice Cling for deletion. You claim that Google returns essentially nothing [1]. I'm afraid you have not realized that Cling is in fact very notable and that source do exist. Try https://www.google.ca/search?q=%22Alice+Cling%22+pottery&hl=en&authuser=0#hl=en&authuser=0&tbm=bks&q=%22Alice+Cling%22+pottery&* for example. All the best, Mduvekot (talk) 17:31, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair -- the article has been significantly improved. Ies (talk) 18:07, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Alice Cling. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:41, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Descha Muchtar[edit]

Hello I enjoy sandwiches. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Descha Muchtar, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: professional collobaration with a notable person indicates significance/importance. Thank you. So Why 11:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the note. Hopefully they come up with some reliable references as verification. There only seem to be links to her Instagram account at the current time. Ies (talk) 11:39, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Inappropriate warning and behavior from "new" user User:Baringabad regarding the article Electronic shaving machine, shortly after its creation by another new account, User: Vivahabhojanam. Initial removal of my edit without explanation here, and then 2 more reverts here and here with the cut-and-paste edit summary "Afd discussion continuing , no need to speedy", though the AfD itself was initiated after my CSD, and as a blank page without any text. After their 3rd under-explained revert, they strangely placed the above notice on my talkpage, again without elaboration. Very fishy, admins notified. I enjoy sandwiches (talk) 13:49, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]