User talk:Iamunknown

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
  • See archives of my talk page at Special:PrefixIndex/User_talk:Iamunknown/
  • I don't expect to be around much. If you want to talk, feel free to leave me a message here, let me know by e-mail and then I will carry on here. Or we could just talk via e-mail. :-) --21:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you and my best wishes to you[edit]

500px-Xmas tree animated.gif

Hi Iamunknown, Thank you very much for your nice message. It is always a great pleasure hearing from you. I wish you the best of the season and a Happy New Year. Tasos (Dr.K. (logos) 15:04, 25 December 2008 (UTC))



--Sallicio\color{Red} \oplus 16:12, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year![edit]

Thanks for the holiday wishes, and please accept mine for you and yours. Jkelly (talk) 21:51, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Hope all is well[edit]

You haven't edited for nearly a month! Enigmamsg 16:49, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

I'm well. I don't expect to be around much, due to RL and such. I will try to respond promptly to e-mail. Hope all is well with you too. :-) --Iamunknown 21:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. MBisanz talk 02:11, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, MBisanz. I have not been editing much recently, but if I start up again and decide to use this tool, I'll read the links you provided. --Iamunknown 20:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Editor assistance list[edit]

Hello. Since your account has been inactive for some time, it has been removed from Wikipedia:Editor assistance/list. There is an explanation at Wikipedia talk:Editor assistance/list#Problem with inactive accounts on the list. You are, of course, welcome to re-add yourself to the list if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:12, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

new utopia what did happens i guss you know since you comment in the talk page :)[edit]

hi did look up new utopia on internet for weeks but did not find much new things so you was in the new utopia article but suddenly quiet in the discussion page any idea what happened to new utopia ?

the offical website did say that in did start construction now maybe it should be update the wikipeida artickel  but at the same time it need to update its pasport infomation... the links have not been updated too 

maybe its should be added in the wiki artick?

mayeb the ppl just move on the seasted things or made a gaeted comunity in aruba or brazil or brunei and kept what was left og the project ? forgot the whole thing moved on to get a green card to sinagpore or dubai ...

a intresting thing was that the laws made for trust and banks and companys in new utopia look like a are taken from somwhere else becuse it dont look like its written in uk or usa enghlis...

l i allso found by look up new utopia citizenship or shomthing like that a investment bank in antigua get closed becuse of fraud was used to transfer fees and money by the new utopia project... one of the owner of the domain name was made bankrupt in florida fort meyers court if it get sued for fraud in florida why did the charte citizens get ther office in caymen island (that showes in the youtube video )now when caymen island can give infomation abut amricans convicted of crime ?

when many of the cariben island did give clients lists the last 5 years why did not charter citise get there mony back (if it is a fraud) becuse look like many of them(investoer/conslats/govounoers have mony offshore?

got sued ? what happen to charter citizens? Investors’ did sue them for fraud and made the project somewhere else ? because all the business /project did stop in 2007/2008 and the site did move to flordia then to uk (just look it the dictionary that was the domain name )

sorry for my bad enghlis

murakami — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 16:07, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to participate at Stalking Cat[edit]

Hello, I'm Just Tidying Up. I'm commenting because, at some point in the past, you contributed to the Stalking Cat article or talk page. I recently performed a major rewrite of Stalking Cat, and I am interested to increase further expansion and improvement of the article, with other editors. If you are interested in this topic, please join us at Talk:Stalking_Cat#Major_rewrite. Thank you. Just Tidying Up (talk) 14:57, 7 November 2013 (UTC)


Category:PD-GermanGov, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 21:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:No fair use[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:No fair use has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 00:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)