User talk:IdreamofJeanie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

One account name:(Kashmiri ),,,deleted only name mir sayyid Ali Hamadani, in any where in wikipedia, and deleted resources ,plz close this accounts (kashmiri — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamadani suffism (talkcontribs) 17:09, 4 June 2018 (UTC) Sir syed ali Hamdani's. Great influnce in poetry of alama iqbal, If you read his book (javidnama) of Iqbal, It was iqbal who call the title syed -sadat, salar- ajam, to syed ali hamdani, that means : head of sufi saints and king of the eastern countries , Alama Iqbal in javid nama persian poetry meeting with sprit of syed Ali hamdani in (heaven),spritial meating along with Rumi and there Alama Iqbal in spritial long Discussion about the Questions with mir sayyid Ali Hamadani. Please you chek it ,and you edit in Wikipedia ,please read this poetry ; Titile ; Javid Nama (RLE iran B) Routledge library edition Iran, Author : Muhammad Iqbal, Publisher: Taylor and francis, ISBN :1136840427,9781136840425, Traslated by: Arthurj Arberry, (Page no :19 and in other pages.)

Contents

Happy New Year, IdreamofJeanie![edit]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Ahshani Edit Removal[edit]

Hello,

I had added some relevant details regarding this pistol which were not there and are also facts taken from the original manufacturer. Could you please help me in guiding why these edits were removed by you. Thank you Bella.black678 (talk) 11:48, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

"It has an internal hammer mechanism...firm grip and safety lock system" as does just about every other hand gun. Other than that wikipedia is not a where to/how to buy guide. There really was nothing in your edit that warranted retaining in an encyclopedia. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 12:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Caravanserai[edit]

Hi dear! I will make and delete wrongs tomorrow and i know my page has falses — Preceding unsigned comment added by AzizaTuran (talkcontribs) 21:41, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

I just feel adding your info to the List of caravanserais would be better overall IdreamofJeanie (talk) 21:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Ajay V[edit]

Hi, your CSD was twice removed by the creator and twice restored by me. After the second occasion it was again quickly removed by an IP with no other edits. Not sure of the best way to deal now? Thanks, Regards, Eagleash (talk) 18:17, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Ah... never mind. Another editor has 'got it'. Thanks. Eagleash (talk) 18:29, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Jamie Maddison[edit]

Okay. I'll try and fix that. Maybe you should have been more specific when nominating for deletion. Deb (talk) 18:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Rollbacker[edit]

Wikipedia Rollbacker.svg

I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 10:20, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Undo[edit]

Hello. You undid one of my edits because you said it was unconstructive. You said it you had made a mistake to put a message on your talk page. You made a mistake. The edit I made was constructive, and I backed it up with a reference.Chocolatebareater (talk) 21:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

MS BAPM[edit]

Hi,

I do not have a mal intention in creating the web page of MS BAPM. I sincerely believe that wikipedia is a primary source of information for students in India (especially). The information could be of use to them and help them in deciding. If you go through the page then you shall find that I have not concocted any information from my end. It was mere stating of facts. The only advantage of the web page is that all the relevant information has been put in one page instead of many web pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hedonistic30 (talkcontribs) 16:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Little stoke fc[edit]

Is this page going to be deleted? If so why?

Thanks Jrugsy1 (talk) 17:21, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

seeWikipedia:Notability IdreamofJeanie (talk) 17:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Suggestion[edit]

Hello Jeanie. Thanks for your tagging of new articles with speedy templates. Just a quick suggestion. In the case of new articles like Deng Gatluak Riek, you are encouraged to wait for at least 10 minutes after the article has been created, before tagging the same with A3 or A1. Have fun and don't hesitate to ask me for any help. Thanks. Lourdes 10:23, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Ronnie Biggs' wife's illegal abortion[edit]

Hi IdreamofJeanie, thanks for researching and providing the cite for the diff. Reading through the context of the paragraph, Escape and Abscondment, I am now wondering if the word "illegal" is necessary. Is the purpose to demonstrate how Ronnie and his did all sorts of criminal behavior? L3X1 My Complaint Desk 19:19, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Promotion[edit]

So i cant promote my own school? Thats the most absurd thing ive ever heard! Honestly i have no clue why you people bother reversing the edits. Do you even live near here? I'm tired of people that have no clue what evangel is or what its about editing its page. Stop.- Kevin Miller Superintendent — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evangelbrandartist (talkcontribs) 17:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

No, you can not use Wikipedia to promote your business. why is that so hard for you to understand? IdreamofJeanie (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Why is my 2 about Emilia and Eduardo going to get deleted[edit]

This article is based on two people who fans know and love how to You have the right to delete it CalebBenjamin012 (talk) 13:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Seriously? a two year old child being exploited by its parents for a few minutes' fame on the internet does not make the child itself noteworthy. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 13:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Removal of my additional content to sex dolls[edit]

Thank you for you message about my additional content. Please be aware that there was no promotional intention and I am not using Wikipedia as a 'soapbox'. It would be a help if you could let me know which parts of my information you found to be soapbox-like in order that I can adjust it. The EX lite is a foam doll that has no reference in the sex doll information page, which is what I was attempting to address in my addition to the page. CloudClimax (talk) 20:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

you have made (so far) three edits to wikipedia, and mentioned "CloudClimax" in each of them. If not promotionbal then I am sorry, but it certainly looks that way

February 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Fall Out Boy: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 22:08, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

10,000 edits[edit]

Wow! This is my 10,000th edit. :-) IdreamofJeanie (talk) 09:05, 19 February 2017 (UTC)


Khujun[edit]

I've userfied this article at User:ItProkashSingha/Khujun. The editor is clearly new, and this seems to be their first stumbling attempt at an article. I agree that it wasn't ready for primetime as such, but deleting it within minutes of it being posted doesn't do much either. The speedy was likely a valid one, but this seems to be a better option. FYI. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 19:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

HMS Victory[edit]

Hi. I noticed your comment on my edit on HMS Victory. We aim in an article to explain words which may not be immediately familiar to the average reader. This is explained briefly at MOS:JARGON, and in more detail at Wikipedia:Make technical articles understandable. Expecting readers to constantly click through to another article to uncover easily explained terms is distracting and tiresome. Where possible we aim to avoid subject specific or over-technical words, but where such words are commonly used within a subject it is helpful to both briefly explain and to link such words or phrases when first used. SilkTork ✔Tea time 22:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for Renaming My Article[edit]

I couldn't figure out how to correct the name. I appreciate that you did so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SarahTehCat (talkcontribs) 17:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

No problem, happy to help. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 17:46, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Telstra Media[edit]

pls dont revert my changes. somsone has pretended that telstra media is now telstras broadband product which isnt the case. so i fixed this. the original article is under Bigpond where it belongs. thanks121.209.25.45 (talk) 08:29, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Sharpe Novels[edit]

Another note please do not change any status on Chosen Men from Corunna, 16 likely live, 11 die in the novels, 2 missing in action, Trooper201 (talk) 21:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Changes to HMS Sheldrake (1806)[edit]

Hi IdreamofJeanie, what does your fiddling accomplish? It expands the TOC by one line, so now we have #6 Notes, citations, and references, and #7 References. If one wants to edit "References", one can do so without giving it a separate heading. As it is, there is little need to edit on the "Notes, citations" part of item - they change in the text, not in the TOC item. I really don't see what you are trying to accomplish, especially when you do it in a thoughtless, careless way. Acad Ronin (talk) 15:31, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. The use of properly formatted headings is useful for our readers to navigate the page easily, and land, should they so desire, at the reference section, without having to then navigate through the X+Y+references section which you have created for this page. please have a look at Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Accessibility#References which specifically advises against using bold markup for section headings as these are not recognised as clickable navigation points. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 17:55, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, the reason I reverted your reversion of my original change is that your action was clearly reflexive, done without thought or care. You introduced an error, and I see that despite your rhetoric you have not taken the time to fix the error you introduced. Had you done your reversion of my change correctly, I would have let it stand - I think you solved a non-problem, but clearly you get satisfaction out of your enforcement of WP policies, and reasonable people may differ on your change. But please, fix your change.Acad Ronin (talk) 00:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Your error IdreamofJeanie (talk) 06:48, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Why did you take down Ethan Ulm?[edit]

Why did you take down Ethan Ulm? Elu7886 (talk) 09:24, 5 April 2017 (UTC)


What did anonymous do wrong with Ethan Ulm? The Person is real and really lives in Farmington How did you find the page as well? Elu7886 (talk) 09:32, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

According to the Farmington article "The population was 2,448 at the 2010 census," do you suggest we list them all? Er, no, we list the notable residents. Those with a Wikipedia article meet Wikipedia's definition of notability. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 09:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Have you visited the little town of Farmington Elu7886 (talk) 10:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Mad Sounds (band)[edit]

I think they were using it as a guide-- to no avail. A7 I'm afraid. Dlohcierekim 16:48, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Absolutely, but to then have left it for half an hour before coming back to actually add anything? well... IdreamofJeanie (talk) 16:57, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
LOL. Don't care to speculate. Dlohcierekim 17:35, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Red Kitten 01.jpg

I left a kitty for you

BagelFox (talk) 17:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Empower MediaMarketing[edit]

Hello IdreamofJeanie. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Empower MediaMarketing, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: speedy deletion requires all revisions to meet the criteria, not just the current spammy one. Thank you. SoWhy 15:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

In the future, this is the point of banning men from all over the world to discover their feet even if summer cures them but not beyond[edit]

You seem to me to protect homosexuals gay and lesbian volbybally speaking I'm sorry, but I apologize for bisexuality and heterosexuality and it's normal for everybody to do as he pleases with sex I do not care about piedicure and foot care. 87.16.191.195 (talk) 16:44, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

whatever..

It has nothing to do with censorship. Rather, it has everything to do with protecting minors[edit]

Hi,

You messaged me here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bobthewikiguy#Wikipedia_is_not_censored

I am not trying to be annoying. I just care very much about the safety of children.

Although the photo certainly looks like the model is an adult woman, it still cannot be technically verified. Not to mention, some teenage girls appear similar to adult woman also. That is why I took precautions and removed the photo.

However, if you have knowledge the photo is legal, please let me know. I am not against photos showing genitalia, just as long as they are legal.

There is absolutely nothing in the images to suggest the models are not consenting adults. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 19:00, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Question about Azzi article[edit]

I see you've removed an edit I made based on notability. How would we show these people as notable without needing articles on them? Ironically, those added are more relevant (and well known) than the four above them. Would a source showing their prominence be enough? Thank you, have a good day.

In retrospect I thought I'd mention that I'm a Gibran, not an Azzi (i.e. I'm not hyping my own family, I just enjoy Lebanese families due to their unique and unexpected diversity and histories). I plan on repairing most poorly written Lebanese family articles.

If they are notable, then create an article for them first. Wikipedia can not list endless numbers of people with a given name without establishing some level of Notability. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 10:17, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

They are notable, but these things are highly relative in a cultural sense. I don't imagine that even a properly sourced article about some prominent Lebanese men of the 19th and early 20th century would stay online for long. That being said, these three people are household names in Keserwan which houses nearly all of Lebanon's Christian population, some 1.5-2 million people, but I don't think they warrant an article. I suppose it best not to mention them at the moment. Either way, thank you for the response.

Nefertiti[edit]

Hi there. I see that you undid my edit on Nefertiti with reference to a new book. Which is this book? Thank you in advance! Best regards, --Bairuilong (talk) 03:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

HI. That Guardian source you quoted was litle more than a press release for "art historian" (not egyptologist) Stierlin's book. Perhaps it c ould be mentioned somewhere in body of the article, but certaibly not in the lead. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 10:17, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Ok, so I will remove the Guardian reference, but I will put back the information. You are of course most welcome to move the information to another place in the article if you think that will be better. Best regards, --Bairuilong (talk) 14:28, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
I see that you once again undid my edit, now with reference to Nefertiti Bust. Have you read the source from that article that support that the bust is not a fake? I have, and it it not so heavy: "No 20th Century artist would go to the extraordinary trouble of carving a limestone bust in exquisite detail and then hiding it below a coat of plaster." For sure the situation with the authenticity is far from clear. There are arguments that supports both sides of the story. Best regards, --Bairuilong (talk) 18:48, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
The arguments are dealt with reasonably on the bust's own page. The argument is about an artifact, and not the queen herself, and including them on Nefertiti page is to give undue weight to a largly disputed theory. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 06:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
I can agree about that the information belongs better in the bust's own page. My main reaction is about the comments "fringe theory" and "debunked theory" when you undid my edits. The theory is not proven to be wrong. Best regards, --Bairuilong (talk) 08:13, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Why was text on testicle deleted?[edit]

Hi, why did you delete the short section on genes and proteins expressed in the testicle from the "testicle" wiki page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Figgep (talkcontribs) 08:52, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Comments by previous editor still apply: section on genes stuck in between sections on structures, text too close to original source to be classed as anything but copyvio, and tone too technical/specialist in comparison to rest of article. Major rework required to present it as suitable for the article. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 15:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Prince George[edit]

Do you have any any specific reason for reverting my edit? Based on the standard form, the mother's maiden name should be included in the info box, not her name and title by marriage. An example would be Elizabeth II whose mother is mentioned as Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon not Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother. Keivan.fTalk 11:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Pubic Hair[edit]

The reasons behind my edits of the article were placed on the talk page. They also addressed concerns voiced by another editor. You have reverted my edits without any additional discussion regarding the points I made. If you want to remove the edits again, please have the courtesy to explain why on the talk page, prior to making them. Bobsd (talk) 14:36, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Peggy Oneal (Lawyer)[edit]

I've made the user the mainspace article as after a cursory review of some sources, it seems they're probably notable (either way it's a good redirect to have). I don't think the draft will be needed anymore. Are you fine with having it being G7'd (I'd need your permission, of course)? Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:36, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

No probs - I have done that, cheers. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Pending Changes[edit]

Please after you make changes in pages under pending changes you should volunteer and accept the changes. Because when editor without PCR right edits a page which is under PC and you didn't accept the edits first before making yours, both will remain pending and add to recurring backlog like your edit here Thanks. -Ammarpad (talk) 13:57, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Duplication[edit]

Thanks for spotting the duplication in 1818 in literature. I've confirmed that The History of the Fairchild Family is a children's book and kept the entry in the Children's section rather than the one in Fiction. Best, Brian Bmcln1 (talk) 21:47, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Brooklyn Bridge‎[edit]

Thank you for reverting my mistaken revert. Apologies. Attic Salt (talk) 15:46, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Deleting Finland Naturism in Europe[edit]

I, the reason of the picture is to demonstrate the essence of naturism in a natural setting like naturism is­. Naturism is natural and some of the pictures in your article show nude people who not naturist but nudist and some of those naturist picture dont show the human body in a natural way. Like in Finland culture, alot of naturist keep their body natural like the way the picture demonstrate it. Alot of those picture show more of West Culture nudist but where the natural naturist ? Tx you alot for your interest — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngman24 (talkcontribs) 21:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

I didn't write my page please don't delete it[edit]

Hi I did not write my page, but I have been editing it because of mistakes made by the writer. I think I am the best person to make these corrections. I did add a Chronology though. Now I see it has reverted to the original which has a lot of innacuracies. What can I do about this? Sarahswenson (talk) 19:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Sarahswenson. Generaly Wikipedia frowns on people editting their own web pages - if you are correcting small, verifiable errors and can provide a source for them that would be ok, but you will need to provide a source as generally people, naturally enough, tend to view themselves in a genrally positive light, and Wikipedia does insist on strict neutrality. Adding a full list of works and everything you have done looks far to much like self publicity and wikipedia is not the place to promote yourself (or anyone else). IdreamofJeanie (talk) 19:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Otto engine[edit]

I understand why my edit to Otto engine was reverted; however, it was in response to a query on the reference desk (here). If you can improve the article by clarifying this use of the term, please do so. —2606:A000:4C0C:E200:E958:86E3:541F:E7F1 (talk) 20:40, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

As you said, you have not provided a source that suggests that this use of Otto engine is in any way common, cf 14 million Ghits for Otto engine (some of which will naturally refer to Otto engines themselves), and over 100 million Ghits for petrol engine, or gasoline engine. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 21:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Shill[edit]

I understand why you may have thought that my mention of Ajit Pai in the wiki page is unjustifiable and i don't believe the evidence i will give you will count as evidence in your mind to justify his placement in the text of the wikipedia shill page. AJit pai is currently the number one most talked about corporate shill in popular culture today and many individuals trying to understand the meaning of shill will be able to gain a better understanding of what one is because he is the most popular most well known example of blatantly undermining the will of the american people (ie. being a shill) and if one hasn't heard mention of him in the last two or three months then I might as well assume that individual is a troglodyte. He is the most relevant individual to mention on that page right now as individuals across the globe know his name and his stance on net neutrality. He has infamously become a popular culture icon. I mean no offense to him, and my excerpt was very criticizing, not cited, and biased, but it was also very true and very relevant. If the American public can't sway his policy the least some one could do is engrave it in stone that he, a government official, sold out to corporations. How you ask? well no one can quite prove he sold out to anyone as he is doing it leaglly just as is every other politician in the land. I have nothing against him doing well personally but his actions will likely cause barriers for entrance to many markets that haven't formed yet and need the internet to do so and it will also cause individuals who create individualistic, creative, exciting, content and research to not easily share there knowledge or research. His shilling will likely inhibit future market growth and create shortfalls inn the economy ( sounds like bullshit probably but the internet of things is connected to everything from heart rate monitors to electrical grids kids educational games, food purchasing online, etc.) The internet of stuff will eventually turn into a place for only the rich will be able to seek knowledge and personal enlightenment just as only scholars and nobles had access to books in the middle ages. I hope you read this and understand my frustration and reasoning for adding him to this page. I thank you for your time and am sorry for any inconvenience i have brought upon you. I hope you see my point of view and it changes your mind about having him as an example on the page. Sincerely,

                  a teen who is probably going to be very effected by the passing of this repeal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:246:201:DB98:C5D4:4B72:48F1:3A80 (talk) 07:23, 22 November 2017 (UTC) 
Wikipedia is not the place to make unsupported allegations like this. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 07:28, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Polly Toynbee[edit]

I've proposed that the page be protected. There's no harm in discussing content issues, but it needs to be done sensibly. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:32, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, IdreamofJeanie. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Swindon cocktail[edit]

Hi there, You reverted the Swindon page back to remove my comment/update.


A dirty Swindon is the name of a cocktail that has been known to contractors visiting and working in Swindon for years(I think daying back to c2008)

Thanks

Simon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sglover665 (talkcontribs) 23:28, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

And you can provide a source for this? IdreamofJeanie (talk) 23:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

NSA is the National Security Agency[edit]

This is inconsistent with Wikipedia ethics and encyclopedic use. Moreover considering that the National Security Agency gave rise to the use of the term NSA in reference to non-state actors. I thought I was improving Wikipedia and even made comments on the talk page which you disregarded. Screw it, without rationale or explanation you are just a foe (a dead ringer working for the interests of a belligerent force) that makes editing here uninviting and against social norms for civil life or the encouragement of the platform. People like you make Wikipedia suck and discourages others to edit but sure you are obviously being paid to do what you do. Problemsmith (talk) 11:02, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

If you want to sing the praises of the National security agency, then National Security Agency is the place to do it. a disambiguation page is there to point people at the page they want, not to give a full description - that what the article is there for. Love and kisses. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:07, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for preserving my edit, I don't understand why you reverted my edit first instead of just adding your improvement to it, sorry for getting pissed off. Not 20 seconds after I did it it was reverted without reason, talk or comment leading me to assume you were an National Security Agency insider. I sent you a thanks 2U. Ciao Problemsmith (talk) 11:35, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Reverting my edits[edit]

I don't get why I need references when all the genres these films were before needn't any references in the first place? Plus a lot of these films were adapted from tragedy plays. IceBrotherhood (talk) 6:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

"(I'm adding the genre of tragedy to the film because it has the quality of tragedy. It's a plot of misfortune with the downfall of a major character and a sense of catharsis at the end of the film.)" This is your opinion. Unless you can find a film critic to support your opinion, it is original research which is not accepted on Wikipedia. When making blanket changes to a whole raft of articles it should have occurred to you that your opinion is not widely held. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 14:51, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Well my opinion isn't widely held or will ever be held because rarely anything is labeled a Tragedy these days despite many film and television that even though they possess the qualities they won't be labeled as such because people don't even know the existence of Tragedy these days. Also many films and television shows I edit who have Philosophical themes but don't get labeled as Philosophical fiction. How do I work with underused genres when the only sources out there are implication and analysis based? Many people don't even realise these are genres. So, am I able to give you references that are implication based? Also Shakespeare's work is almost universally tragedy and half of these are adaptation of his work. So, what's the difference with his plays being labeled tragedies vs. adaptations of this plays. Whom sometimes follow his play verbatim. Underused genres only begin to be nourished when they start being acknowledged again. Well then is there something I can do to meet you half way since references that start so and so as tragedy is almost non existent? IceBrotherhood (talk) 13:30, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

wikipedia follows published sources. It is not a trend setter/wrong righter/defender of underused expressions. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 21:41, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Then at least can adaptations of Shakespeare's work be defined as Tragedy? As that is their intended genre. Why else would they be called Shakespearean Tragedies? I know that's not what wikipedia is about, but the majority of films and television don't use references to define their genres so, should all wikipedia articles dismiss genres unless referenced. That would be a chaotic mess though if that was made rule of law. IceBrotherhood (talk) 13:48, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Reverting[edit]

music.youtube.com is YouTube Music's website. youtube.com/music is the YouTube channel for music. Why did you revert it 2603:3022:A03:6100:ADB8:BAD3:6BB4:AD9 (talk) 16:51, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

my error: clicking on music.youtube.com redirects you to: https://www.youtube.com/yt/music/en-GB/index.html?locale=GB. I missed the "/yt" in the middle and read it as a redirect to youtube.com/music will undue my revert, cheers. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 17:02, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings[edit]

The Great White North.jpg

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:10, 24 December 2017 (UTC)


A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For fantastic work on defending Wikipedia. scope_creep (talk) 10:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Giallume[edit]

Why don't you like giallume? Giallume is love, it's life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.90.49.245 (talk) 13:33, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

French words and phrases[edit]

Re: your reverts at Menu, etc. See Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary#Major differences. The subject of the article Menu is the thing itself, not the word. It is incorrect to categorize the article Menu in Category:French words and phrases. The etymology of the English word "menu" is a proper subject for Wiktionary, not Wikipedia. It is at best of perpipheral relevance to the article. --Srleffler (talk) 17:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

by that logic that, and similar cats would all be empty as (almost) all articles are about "something", not "the word used to describe/reference it". presumably "fait acompli" doesn't belong, as the fait acompli itself isn't french, it's just the word that's French, same with "Encore" and "Deja vu". The catagory is French WORDS.IdreamofJeanie (talk) 17:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
We do sometimes have articles about words and phrases. For inclusion in such a category, an article should actually be about the word or phrase. Beauf is an article that is explicitly about a French word. Menu is not.--Srleffler (talk) 17:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Fait accompli, properly, doesn't have an article. Encore doesn't belong in this category for the reasons stated. Deja vu certainly doesn't belong, but Déjà vu is at least arguable.--Srleffler (talk) 17:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
See also WP:CATDEF. We categorize articles based on definining characteristics of the subject of the article, not the article's title. The subject of the article Menu is not the French word menu. It is the list of foods and beverages a customer can purchase.--Srleffler (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2018 (UTC)


French words and phrases[edit]

Re: Your multiple reverts at Retail. See Category:French words and phrases which clearly states that the category is "not for articles about concepts and things but only for articles about the words themselves." Etymologists suggest that the word, retail is a derivation of the French tailler - all of which is explained in the article itself. Thus retail is not a French term of itself, but rather a probable English derivation of a French term. Further, the article is concerned with retail as a commercial activitiy, rather than as a word or a term. The category French words and phrases is not suitable for inclusion in this article. 02:04, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Reversion with no explanation[edit]

Swimsuit Please explain why the link to the wikipedia Naturism article was deleted when it is the logical progression of the paragraph. Reversion without explanation is not nice. Malcolm Boura (talk) 15:59, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

No it's far from that. Swimsuit and Naturism are pretty much polar opposites. A couple of teenagers skinny dipping would hardly consider themselves naturists. That sentance was quite simply out of place. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 09:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Unexpected reversion in Mathura[edit]

My edit has been allegedly removed even though the information provided was perfectly correct. If a few lines were too poetic for you to understand you could just have removed them but not the factual information. You definitely wouldn't like to rebuke because I've lived there for a decade. Srdtheking (talk) 18:53, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Holi Occurs all over Indian Subcontinent and is hardly "Synonymous" with just one city, and your rather flowery description reads like an extract from a travel guide to promote your city. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 19:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. One thing is certain. You're probably weak at mathematics. If A relates to B, is it really necessary that B relates to A in a well defined form? Think hard. I never associated Holi's synonymity with Mathura rather vice versa. What I meant to say was simply that the fame of the Holi celebrations in Mathura reach far and wide. And whenever you talk of Mathura, after Krishna, Holi itself follows. If not then maybe the converser lacks proper knowledge of the subject. As for the flowery description you could have just burnt it and reverted it to your husky interest rather than deleting everything; even the facts. If a cultural specialty being highlighted seems to you like an intentional promotion, then you're deeply mistaken. Please respect new editors and help them as a senior if you really are a worthy editor. Srdtheking (talk) 09:08, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Relevance is not symmetrical. One subject can be highly relevant to another, while the second subject is not very relevant to the first at all. Saying that one thing is "synonymous" with another, though, implies a strong bidirectional relation. I don't know anything about Mathura or Holi, but if the latter is widely celebrated throughout India then saying that Mathura is "synonymously identified" with Holi is clearly wrong. You may have had a correct idea in mind, but chose an incorrect phrase to express it.--Srleffler (talk) 18:56, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Need attention :)[edit]

Hello! An old dispute that you were involved in has been brought up again. Your opinion is greatly valued. Thank you! KevinNinja (talk) 00:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Edits to bondage[edit]

Those images are inappropriate! Young kids and people that can't stand things like that can see it! It's sexual content! Pancakes654 22:50, 20 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pancakes654 (talkcontribs)

This is an encyclopedia if "people can't stand things like that" why would they be looking at BDSM in an encylopedia? Yes it's sexual content, in an encyclopedia articla about a sexual practice. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 22:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Reverting my edits on TrustoCorp[edit]

I'dlike to know what was the reason for your reverting of my edits on the article TrustoCorp. Thanks in advance for your answer.Lyupant (talk) 10:27, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

your edits seemed pretty much unsourced commentary and wholly NPOV. "Citizens of America delight in this art" indeed. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 11:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Merger of Qrendi and Maqluba[edit]

Merger discussion for Qrendi [edit]

Merge-arrows.svg

An article that you have been involved in editing—Qrendi —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Beckettnoti (talk) 23:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Sorry[edit]

But what does this mean? <!--Consensus is to use ''Queen of Scotland''-->[[Queen of Scotland]] Deb (talk) 16:36, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

It means that that phrase is being changed to and fro in a slow moving edit war and that at some time in the past a discussion settled on one to try and stop the constant bloody squabbling, not that that seems to be working, looking at the last 20 - 30 edits to this page. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 16:44, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Yeah, I think I was just confused by Lelin19's edit history.Deb (talk) 16:47, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:King's Potong ice cream[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:King's Potong ice cream, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

WP:UAA reports on users with no edits[edit]

Information iconGenerally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI: "Wait until the user edits. Do not report a user that hasn't edited unless they are clearly a vandal. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste our time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.

For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. So we add the {{wait}} tag to the report, it goes to WP:UAA/HP for a week or more, and must then be reviewed again to see if the account has since become active before removing it. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports. User:Beeblebrox (talk) 20:24, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

incident[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.24.31.102 (talk) 14:20, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

IP blocked - sockpuppet. --NeilN talk to me 14:49, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for helping out at the Clitoris article and at other contentious articles. If you ever see any edit made to the Clitoris article that you find problematic, please revert. I'll eventually be there at the article's talk page to weigh in. AnaSoc is a new editor, and so requires some guidance, but she has also been somewhat stubborn. Hopefully, she will do as advised and propose changes on the talk page before making them (unless, of course, they are unlikely to be contested). Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:59, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Brillantmont international School[edit]

i made a huge note of the life of students in the boarding school and you deleted it, why ? User talk:185.10.225.98 thanks to answer — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.10.225.98 (talk) 19:50, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for coming here and asking. Wikipedia policy on external links is to limit one "official" link to subject's website - clearly anyone wishing to learn more about the school can navigate the school's website without a dozen links to it from Wikipedia. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 19:56, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

"Spam gone"[edit]

We are a UK publishing house of Anthony Burgess, amongst others. Please clarify "Spam gone." action. Jonny walsh (talk) 13:52, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a free advertising project. Your use of the word "We" in the above comment amply demonstrates that your purpose is promotional. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 13:56, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Thompson Submachine Gun[edit]

Hello, I want to talk about the Thompson Submachine Gun which we do not seem to agree on. I wanted to ask why you disapproved of my section on the article, as I thought it was a useful edition to it. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheScottishElephant (talkcontribs) 05:07, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

And I, like Hohum before me, think it is useless trivia. It says much more about Pike than it does about the TSG. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 09:04, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
No it is a pop culture reference of a tommy gun — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheScottishElephant (talkcontribs) 21:16, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Finish basketball[edit]

Why did you remove all my external links? They were all fine. Thanks in advance. Igoreurobasket (talk) 16:22, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

See Wikipedia's Externalk links and Spam policies. Your contributions to Wikikpedia consist solely of placing links to your website (or at least the website that you have named yourself after), and you have been warned twice before that wikipedia is not here to collect spam links. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 16:27, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
So...what? Some of the Wiki pages don't even have information that we have, why to remove it? We have it all, current rosters, current stats. Why not allowed people to see that?Igoreurobasket (talk) 16:34, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Have you read the two guidelines I linked to previously? Link to club page is Ok, spam links to your page is not. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 16:44, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, but i was not spamming. I wanted to share information for one entire league and that's it.

Igoreurobasket (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Unexplained reverts[edit]

Hi. Some of your recent activities seem random and illogical (perhaps you didn't bother to read the articles in question). Could you please provide a brief rationale for your unexplained spate of rollbacks to the articles Danish slave trade, Thrall, Slavery in Sweden, and Slavery in Denmark? A good place to do this would be on each article's talk page. Cheers.

really? The previous redirects are more approriate.IdreamofJeanie (talk) 09:22, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
I will start the discussions on those talk pages, then you can simply weigh in as to why you feel that your edits are appropriate, e.g. your removal of Category:Slavery in Norway. Again, it does seem rather random and incoherent.

Proposed deletion of File:Text sandwich example.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The file File:Text sandwich example.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Old orphaned esoteric file.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 17:48, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Puberty article[edit]

If you see something like this from that editor, do please revert. Matters have already been explained to him at Talk:Adult. Sources do not support what the editor keeps adding. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:11, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Powerbomb.tv issue[edit]

I dont why and don't see whats the problem if their is any problem with the article to be speedy deleted send me a message and telling me why. SockerPunch234 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:05, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Powerbomb.tv[edit]

Hello IdreamofJeanie. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Powerbomb.tv, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: seems signiificant enough (have a look at GNews as well), use WP:AFD instead. Thank you. SoWhy 14:22, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Mir sayyid ali hamadani[edit]

Why you delete mir sayyid Ali Hamdani name , Hamadani suffism (talk) 05:40, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

@Hamadani suffism: I deleted your edit for the reason I gave in the edit summary. Nowhere in the article does it say that Mohhamed Iqbal was influenced in any way by Hamandi, and you have not provided a source to back up your assertion. Please do not add again without a reliable source. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 23:10, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

I have problem in edit[edit]

Please help me Hamadani suffism (talk) 05:52, 7 June 2018 (UTC)