Email this user

User talk:In ictu oculi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This user's email on Toolbox menu (also icon top right hand side) is activated. /Useful

Contents

File:Knowledge & Innocence.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Knowledge & Innocence.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 23:14, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Knowledge & Innocence.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Knowledge & Innocence.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Visitor (Neil Young album).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Visitor (Neil Young album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, In ictu oculi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Broken links[edit]

Hello! I've noticed that you redirected the page "Auf Wiedersehn" to a different location today: [1]. Did you see that you broke 7 incoming links? Would you fix all of them, please?

By the way, I would agree to renaming the article "Auf Wiedersehn (album)" to "Auf Wiedersehn (Demis Roussos album)". You can request speedy deletion of the latter page if you want. But please, don't rename the article to "Auf Wiedersehen (...)" or "Auf Wiederseh'n (...)". The cover says "Auf Wiedersehn", so the current title is the only correct one. --Moscow Connection (talk) 19:43, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Thought I'd caught most of them (I had, there is only 1). Takes time to update. Thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:27, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

header level of discussion[edit]

Please stop changing the header level of this discussion. Its a section of extended discussion related to the above page move request, and when that page move request is concluded, that discussion will also be concluded as part of the same. By changing the header, you're inviting the discussion to not be closed when the page move request is done. -- Netoholic @ 00:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Good point, despite the fact that it's the wrong place, certainly closing it would be good, hadn't thought of that. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:25, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

but masculinist historiography has twice ...What?[edit]

Xx236 (talk) 14:22, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Would you be so kind to correct Marjan (film)? Xx236 (talk) 07:18, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello In ictu oculi, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
  • Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

  • If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

  • A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
  • Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
  • The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jill Barklem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winter Story (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Weinberg operas[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Weinberg operas has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:24, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Reimann operas[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Reimann operas has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:31, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nicolai operas[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Nicolai operas has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:41, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Boesmans operas[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Boesmans operas has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:46, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Stop stalking me now[edit]

I told you I would get an administrator involved if you did not leave me and what I create alone only a day ago and yet you're still at it, targeting recent redirects I've created. There is no other way you would have found these if I had not recently created them. Sun & Moon, Mama Always Told Me, Je te promets. All still on my watchlist. I'm informing an administrator. Drop your issues with me now. Find better things to do. Ss112 23:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

I am not going to take a position in this matter (for now). But I was asked by Ss112 to have a word. In this case my advice is directed to both of you. Take a deep breath. Try to assume good faith. Try to be sensitive about how the other might be looking at things, especially if you are tinkering with their edits while at the same time remembering that we don't OWN anything on here. If you are having a disagreement or a broader clash of vision/personality try to work something out so you can both continue to improve the project w/o stepping on each other's toes. Wikipedia is a big place and you are both experienced editors. It should not be that hard to find ways of working with, or if necessary, around one another. Speaking from experience, the one thing I strongly advise is to avoid reaching the point where communication breaks down and your disagreement ends up on one of the drama boards. Happy endings there are not common. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
@Ad Orientem: totally fine, but there is a latent problem here. I was just going to say several active song editors do this (create additional redirects pointing users at one particular modern song on an album when inevitably with 70 years of popular music means there will almost always be other songs for generic titles) and I was going to say "look here's another example", picking the recent Taylor Swift album at random, and unfortunately it just happens to not be by another but by this editor, which I didn't expect, because it wasn't found from the individual editor's history (it's some time ago). So how about this. When I see a misdirect, pointing readers at one current album, if it's by this particular editor I'll leave it, but if it's by other editors I'll fix it. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:25, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
That sounds fine. Alternatively maybe you could just drop a friendly fyi note on Ss112's page and let them know you have a concern and let them deal with it. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:28, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for that IIO, and I myself will try to search a bit more and disambiguate to avoid problems like this. Ss112 01:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Goodo, thanks. In all fairness to yourself, I do realize that it is not always easy to find other topics. Those four examples above "Sun & Moon", "Mama Always Told Me", "Je te promets" might not be immediately obvious. I have made the mistake myself. But, when it's something really generic like "look here's another example", it is very easy to check using the right hand top Wikipedia internal string search. Alternatively the format [TITLE (ARTIST song)] is absolutely guaranteed to not cause any misdirect problems and has the added advantage of being picked up clearly in a Google search --- I presume your objective is to help users get from Google to the correct album article. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:42, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, that comment about format wasn't very clear. What I meant was King of My Heart or King of My Heart (song) both run a high risk of misdirects, particularly as the misdirect can easily occur in 2018 2019 2020 as Wikipedia grows. This is one of the issues even when editors have exhaustively checked, they can't know what else is coming out next month. But there's no way King of My Heart (Taylor Swift song) can ever cause a misdirect, and it shows up more visibly on a Google search or Wikipedia search. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:49, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Wishing you both the joy of the feast... "And suddenly there appeared with the angel a great multitude of the heavenly host, praising God and saying: “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace to men of goodwill!” -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:54, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas![edit]

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings". :) BOZ (talk) 01:00, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!![edit]

Merry Christmas, hope you're having a relaxing time during this period and that next year will be even better for us all here.★Trekker (talk) 13:46, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas![edit]

Wikipedia Happy New Year.png Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018!

Hello In ictu oculi, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2018.
Happy editing,
JudeccaXIII (talk) 20:41, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Orphaned non-free image File:Jewelry Box (Shizuka Kudo album).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jewelry Box (Shizuka Kudo album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 30[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited General Terán, Nuevo León, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terán (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

New Years new page backlog drive[edit]

Hello In ictu oculi, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

  • The total number of reviews completed for the month.
  • The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Brother Sister (film)[edit]

I'm confused by the redirect you created at Brother Sister (film). Why does it have 2 names listed in addition to the redirect target? Also, the film doesn't seem to be notable at all...would someone A. really be looking for it and B. be satisfied with the redirect to Helen Slayton-Hughes which makes no mention of the film in the article? only (talk) 15:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

It sometimes is worth leaving a little redundant DNA is a redirect in case anyone wants to change the redirect later. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:48, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

A personal plea[edit]

Please have a look at User:Andrewa/A personal plea and apply it to this edit. TIA

But I thoroughly endorse your comment this is lazy...! Andrewa (talk) 17:34, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Yes, you're right, rose to it, more fool me. Thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:40, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Moves[edit]

I've raised this with you before. Why do you keep moving articles to disambiguated titles than leaving the original title as a redirect to that disambiguated title? What does that achieve? If you have a better target for the original title, fair enough, redirect it somewhere else, but please either do the whole thing or just leave them be. Cases in point just from today: [2], [3], [4], [5]. Please either do something sensible with these, and the others you've moved, or move them back. --Michig (talk) 16:01, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Bedwetters is redirected to bedwetter. What to do with Déborah Rodríguez is more of a problem, a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to Déborah Rodríguez (athlete) makes most sense, but okay have removed (athlete). In ictu oculi (talk) 16:15, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
and now...[6]. --Michig (talk) 16:18, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Fair enough, the category says vocal group but I have removed vocal. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:27, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
and here's some more: [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. I would suggest you stop doing any more page moves until you can get this right. --Michig (talk) 16:35, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Apology for this edit which I cannot explain (which is scary to me obviously). I can't see how best to fix it. (Please feel free to just remove this comment if you do). Andrewa (talk) 15:02, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

That's okay. Seriously though, there are four reasons for not locking ones edits immediately - one is allowing a pause for others to revert, the second is time for the what links here on templates to catch up, the third is WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT, the fourth is toilet breaks. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:19, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

BZN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Singles Collection
Tigrane (Scarlatti) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Michael Schneider

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Move[edit]

Hi, could you please join in this move discussion. Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 17:53, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Is "pączki" an English word?[edit]

Hi, thank you for your participation in the recent requested move discussion at Talk:Pączki. I've posted a follow-up question to better understand what the result of that discussion means not only for the article's title, but also for its content. I'd be very greatful, if you could reply at Talk:Pączki#Follow-up: is "pączki" an_English_word?Kpalion(talk) 18:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Medicine Head, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rising Sun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

So impressive[edit]

Hi In ictu oculi. I must say how staggeringly impressive is you User page. A stunning list. If you would permit me, I could fix 15 DAB page links for you - unless of course you have left them like that deliberately! Kind regards. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:01, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Well I used to keep track of the articles I made. And keep track of changes. But as they've got more random I stopped. No, I don't deliberately link anything to a dab, it has never occurred to me to check the page for dab links. Surprising how many Polish composers have cyclists added now with the same name. :) Thank you. Done it. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:06, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Am just off back to my wiki cave. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:10, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Redirects I created[edit]

You have previously said in December of last year that you would stop editing redirects I created. Less than a month later, it appears this no longer stands. I will get an administrator involved again if you cannot stop this. You said you would, so do it. Don't move this discussion to my talk page. If you want to reply, reply here. If you remove it, then I will take that as an acknowledgement that you have seen it and agree to stop. Ss112 21:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

S112, this is in no way personal, I have not been picking your redirects, I have simply been correcting misdirects in A-I order, I didn't stop to check who created the mislinks, they surely can't all be ones you made? Take an example I see you've put Courtship (song) pointing at Bjork when there are four songs listed at Courtship (disambiguation). With respect perhaps you should consider WP:OWN. If that doesn't apply to articles, then it certainly doesn't apply to misdirects pointing to the wrong article. But if you insist any misdirect you make must stay then I'll pause. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:10, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
How is this a matter of WP:OWN when it was your idea to stop repointing my apparent "misdirects" to avoid conflicts? Ss112 21:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Again I am not repointing your misdirects I've just corrected about a dozen misdirects in A-I order. In a couple of cases I noticed it was yours and left it. But surely the rest aren't all yours are they? (note that I haven't corrected Courtship (song) to point to the dab page). In ictu oculi (talk) 21:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
I didn't say they were all "mine". I believe the only ones I did revert or take issue with were ones I created, aside from Hang on Me, which is not one I created but was still on my watchlist from when I moved it recently. Ss112 21:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
I'm looking at them, seems at least a third of them were in fact yours. I am very sorry but I assure you that there was no targetting involved, as I said I was simply following alphabetical order. Can I suggest something; perhaps if you feel this strongly that particular (song) should redirect to a particular artist or album, then maybe you should create an article on the song? But it's only a suggestion. I will try and check to avoid your redirects where possible. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:22, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
I have to go offline for a day now. All the best. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:23, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Gardel factoid[edit]

Greetings. Just noticed the song info you recently added. It seems more than plausible. If factual, it's a productive edit. BUT. No reference was cited. Could you please remedy the situation? Regards Tapered (talk) 06:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Fixed In ictu oculi (talk) 18:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. Much appreciated. It was my request that protected the page from the 'born in Uruguay' crowd, and I've watched it off and on for years. Have some pasta!
Ravioli Marinara.jpg
Tapered (talk) 08:46, 23 January 2018 (UTC)





Disambiguation link notification for January 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bastards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Letters Home (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Fixed In ictu oculi (talk) 18:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fair & Lovely (cosmetics).png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fair & Lovely (cosmetics).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Fixed In ictu oculi (talk) 18:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Paul Gillette listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul Gillette. Since you had some involvement with the Paul Gillette redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --woodensuperman 15:22, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Tony[edit]

Are you aware of what happened with Tony1? See his Talk page User talk:Tony1. An admin totally misinterpreted something Tony had written to be a legal threat, and, before verifying, immediately put him on indefinite block! Tony was so incensed he quit! Terrible. --В²C 00:52, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Page-move question[edit]

You recently moved MilkandCookies MilkandCookies (website) with no explanation, and you left the non-disambiguated pagename as a redirect with no actual content. Are you planning to write a primary-topic article or DAB page among multiple meanings? Your action appears to have reversed a previous pagemove that was based on some talkpage discussion (Talk:MilkandCookies (website)#Requested move). Could you please leave a note on the talkpage about your plans, and maybe wait for others to chime in before pressing to far ahead? DMacks (talk) 04:21, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

sure In ictu oculi (talk) 10:02, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Edit summaries[edit]

Please ensure you use edit summaries to explain your edits. This is particularly important when putting prod tags on articles or nominating them for deletion in other ways. Thanks. --Michig (talk) 09:00, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NaNa (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page No Depression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lego House (Billund) poster opening 2017.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lego House (Billund) poster opening 2017.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Deccan Park[edit]

Hi, I'm here to request a move. Correct me if I am wrong. The dab Deccan Park has only two entries and both are related to each other - Deccan Park (park) and Deccan Park (building). Per WP:SIMILAR, hatnote is more appropriate instead of dab, and Deccan Park (park) is a weird name it should be moved to Deccan Park. Thanks. Let There Be Sunshine (talk) 15:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Memoirs of a Murderer (2017 film).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Memoirs of a Murderer (2017 film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Response[edit]

I didn't say I "own" them. I have never said that. You're bringing that policy up as an excuse now to renege on the fact that you said you would leave redirects I created alone to avoid conflicts. You haven't done that. It doesn't matter what the reason is, and "it's a stopgap" doesn't make any sense. Request the move at WP:RM/TR or don't touch it. And perhaps you should start checking to avoid future messages like this or warnings from admins. Ss112 11:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

One way or the other page history needs to be preserved when articles are blanked, as you want to do it yourself, that is fine by me, and I have left you a message at Talk:You Are the Reason (Calum Scott) suggesting that you use a G6 to fix the problem. All the best. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:44, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
That's not the main issue and you know it, so stop deflecting. Leave redirects I created alone and we wouldn't be in this position in the first place. Ss112 11:56, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Again, you are not the only editor who does this. But you are the only one who gets sensitive if they are fixed. Can you at least make an effort that when you blank an article you preserve page history at a more appropriate location and fix resulting dab issues? There's no urgency to do this since it's fair enough to allow other editors some time - even a couple of months - to revert. But sooner or later if nothing happens then the page history should be preserved and the title treated with normal disambiguation you blanked the article 26 Nov, that is 2 months ago. Look I also leave things for a few weeks to allow editors to revert, but sooner or later they need clearing up. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:03, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
What are you talking about? I'm actually confused. There was no article at that time at the namespace "You Are the Reason". I blanked the page for failing WP:NSONGS. I don't know what else you mean that I "needed" to do. It was fine where it was at the time. I couldn't move it to You Are the Reason (Calum Scott song) at the time, because that already existed, as you know. I think you're honestly trying to tell me to remember every single redirect I've created and go back and see if that's also the title of another song in the entirety of music history, so disambiguate it and create a dab page (which takes time to research and do). Nobody is forced to create a dab page for the other number of possibilities there is. I only do it when I think it's obvious. However, I try to be a bit more aware now to avoid you coming along thinking it's your duty to clean up or "housekeep" on Wikipedia/to avoid you moving the page, but that was November 2017. You hadn't made a big deal to me of saying I should do it then. Ss112 12:14, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Okay, well I'm sorry to be confusing. Just to stick to this example. clearly You Are the Reason (Calum Scott song) was non notable, it shouldn't have been created, you were right to blank and redirect to the bio. That cleans up 90% of the problem. What it doesn't do however is restore the original situation where a reader could put in "You Are the Reason" and end up with the search results leading them to Air Supply etc etc. Personally I'm of the view that having moved You Are the Reason page history out of the way to You Are the Reason (Calum Scott song) redirect, the remaining You Are the Reason would be better off deleted, using a CSD7, but there some admins who simply won't do that, which then forces creation of a dab page at the baseline. Does that make sense? In ictu oculi (talk) 12:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Well as I just said in one of my edits to my above message, nobody should be forced to create a dab page for the amount of other possibilities there may be. It's nice and helpful if they do, but it's not required by WP policy. I had no reason to in November 2017 because I didn't know any user would have an issue with it then. That would not have even been on my mind. Ss112 12:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey I'm not forcing you, some of them are not worth it. But I just can't help noticing that some of these generic titles are squatting over other songs - that Tremaine song was a another example. You (again) were right to blank and redirect it, but that still left a 1946 jazz standard that it was usurping. It's just one of those things - a certain number of non-notable articles (be they songs, anime, books, you name it) once deleted then need repointing to the other more historical items. A similar problem with those editors who when a new 2018 album comes out believe they need to redirect every song on their new album to their new article, even if half a dozen other artists have used the title before. I've seen you correct editors who do that, so on this we appear to agree. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Consensus before massive reworking[edit]

My issue with the D.M.Z. album. You've already decided to create a redirect and point all instances of the former link to the latter before consensus has been reached on the move. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:03, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Fixing broken links will need to be done either way. Sorry but the onus is on yourself to provide evidence that DMZ with dots never occurs except for this Christian album. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:05, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. I saw that some pointed to D.M.Z. (album), while others correctly pointed to D.M.Z. I'm not sure why you decided to create a redirect to point back to the album and fix the bad linking (that you created) by pointing to your redirect. It's all poor editing. The fact that the album title has a built-in disambiguation is reason enough to not need another page with your preferred spelling. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:08, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
One way or another, the hard-wiring inside article html would be better done correctly to avoid mislinks. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Help finding entries for Chapter Ten[edit]

Hi IIO. Since you appear to be good at finding topics on such short notice, if you get time, can you help list things that may be known as either "Chapter Ten" or "Chapter 10" at Chapter Ten? It was originally a redirect to a Kendrick Lamar album but it seemed like too generic a title to remain that way. Thanks! Ss112 14:11, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for asking me, I found one more, but think you have already found what there is. Cheers In ictu oculi (talk) 15:46, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Sarah Brown[edit]

I withdrew the RM and am thinking of going with a multi-choice version, using a table. What do you think?

Draft: Talk:Sarah Jane Brown/table

Thanks! --В²C 23:12, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

In ictu oculi, I, for one, would appreciate your input in the current discussion which looks like the best chance for resolution in a long time. --В²C 16:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
In ictu oculi, have you been over there lately? Still think there isn't much opposition to the "wife of" disambiguation? --В²C 16:59, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello In ictu oculi, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!
Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg
The NPP backlog at the end of the drive with the number of unreviewed articles by creation date. Red is older than 90 days, orange is between 90 and 30 days old, and green is younger than 30 days.

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
  • We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

  • We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
  • Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

RMs[edit]

Good job on the video game series RMs. I think cleaning up the existing incomplete DABs will solve most of the problems. -- Netoholic @ 17:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, it clears up 4 howlers, but it's still a classical example of a local consensus. You were right to fix the guideline, though it doesn't surprise me it was rejected. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
The more we can take care of using the existing guideline before raising the question widely (WP:VPP), the better. If we can show that a majority of VG articles already use (video game series), it'll be an argument to make it more consistent. -- Netoholic @ 19:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Primary idea[edit]

Hello. If you want to follow-up on your idea of switching the two primary title criteria I think you have good reasoning to do so. Either a "bold" change or a talk-page discussion may end with that idea being adopted. Randy Kryn (talk) 21:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

I'm a bit wary of initiating a discussion on that. But I believe it makes sense to state the long term serious encyclopaedic view first and the page-counting view second. I will keep on eye on the next discussion there. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Comico moved page.[edit]

Hi, I just wanted to say that I apologize for moving the Comico page (American publisher) without having a discussion about it before hand. I did not mean to cause any trouble. I thought that because that company is now defunct and the NHN's Comico is currently around and much bigger that it made sense to select that as the default Comico. I don't usually move pages without having a discussion first but I personally thought that it wasn't a big deal which is why I went ahead with the move by myself. I will delete the current move discussion on Comico (Korea) and start a move discussion on the U.S. version. Sorry for the mess and the confusion. I did not mean any malice from it. AquilaXIII (talk) 03:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

That's no problem. The other editor reverted you, cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

If you're interested[edit]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzanne Olsson (3rd nomination) Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:00, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Move discussion[edit]

Hi, In ictu, I have archived this somewhat separate discussion and left your comment since you're voting in the move. You may consider moving it to the formal RM started below it. –Ammarpad (talk) 16:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Precious six years![edit]

Precious
Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg
Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:32, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Dolcé[edit]

Please would you read and reply to my message about Dolcé? 151.48.215.96 (talk) 12:36, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Well, you've read my message here. Have you read my explaination in that discussion too? I've written it to clarify your doubts about that name (and also Italian language) so I hope it'd be helpful to you, and since you went to that discussion one hour after it was opened I deduce it's an argument you're interested in. 151.48.215.96 (talk) 11:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

A few days have passed since my last reply to you ([15]), I'd like you to read it and also my replies to another user who joined the discussion, thank you. 151.48.215.96 (talk) 08:08, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much for moving Baselga di Piné! Why didn't you do the same for Ruffré-Mendola? You disagreed to move Dolcé because "the correction should start on the it.wp": well, in it.wikipedia they've corrected the spelling of Ruffré-Mendola, exactly as for Baselga di Piné. Could you move also this page please? I hope that you didn't change your mind because of that article in a local newspaper... In others articles of the same newspaper you read "Ruffré-Mendola" ([16]) but they aren't sufficient as sources anyway. Rather, have a look at one of the main daily national newspapers in Italy, La Stampa: (you have to google the text between Qs: Qsite:lastampa.it "ruffrè mendola" -"ruffré mendola"Q AND Qsite:lastampa.it "ruffré mendola" -"ruffrè mendola"Q) over 655 results for Ruffré-Mendola versus...0 (yes, Z-E-R-O) for Ruffrè-Mendola (because if you open the only 2 results that you see you'll read in both pages "Ruffre'-Mendola" with apotrophe). And even Google Maps spells it "Ruffré"... Besides this, the noted overmentioned DOP and DiPI and, overall, the article in the Italian wiki which was already moved. I don't see which reason there may be not to move this page after moving Piné... 151.48.215.96 (talk) 19:39, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

In ictu oculi, just as info, this user is an LTA and has been blocked several times for socking, include multiple global locks by Meta. -- ferret (talk) 16:40, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

In Excelsis and Treasure Island (song)[edit]

Any ideas for where these should link or if they can be turned into dabs? I'm sure there's stuff out there under the same or similar names, other than as just redirects to Azealia Banks' "upcoming project" created by Another Believer. Thanks. Ss112 03:41, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

You were right, I've had a word with him. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:51, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Virtual self, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Virtual (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

a heads-up[edit]

Rms125a@hotmail.com started an AFD on Dalia (American singer), an article you started. They should have informed you themselves. Geo Swan (talk) 09:42, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Cadet colleges[edit]

If you still think this is desirable, I have no objection to a formal WP:RM. Just thought I would go ahead with the move to Cadet college for now. Keep in mind that we also have List of cadet colleges in Pakistan and List of cadet colleges in Bangladesh. So wouldn't it be curious if the main article was titled Cadet colleges in Pakistan? EdJohnston (talk) 22:58, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
@EdJohnston: no you've done the right thing there. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:28, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Max Emanuel Cenčić[edit]

The version with only Max was a result of a misunderstanding ;) - I still think "Cencic" is what he now uses, and what you find in programs, bios and the press. Shouldn't we follow? Last word in the review: "Hingehen!" Go see! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:56, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Probably best to discuss on the page. What he uses in German press is really not the issue until he takes Austrian nationality. That's his decision not ours. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:57, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
He uses it on his own personal website. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:00, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Because so many people are anti-Croatian probably. A lot of East Europeans remove on their English or German personal websites. We don't. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:05, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

English terms[edit]

I see that you've been valiantly trying to protect lots of British terms from being gobbled up and spit out as American-centric primaries. You deserve an honor of some kind, from the Crown if need be. In the meantime, would you mind if I made a bold move of Big Ben to Ben Cartwrght? (dibs on that for April Fools Day/Easter) Randy Kryn (talk) 15:46, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Not so much English but Indian sir, as the main form of English by speakers, if it were just the little Brexit island t'wouldn't matter. But also more encyclopaedic usage to entertainment usage. Another foible. :) In ictu oculi (talk) 15:59, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
True. Then an award by a Rajah as well. That's a good point though, from encyclopaedic to entertainment usage might do well as a point in favor of not moving something. I will do that Big Ben to Ben Cartwright RM on April 1, maybe I'll work up a good case with stats beforehand (it will make the point of recent RM's switching to American usage). I don't say hi much, but have enjoyed your RM's and RM comments, as well as other sightings throughout watch-list travels. Randy Kryn (talk) 16:21, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Likewise Randy, you're a pukka fellow. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:24, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, but, hey, how did you guess my off line identity??? Randy Kryn (talk) 16:30, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Hehe. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:30, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Darn, an RM can't be used for an April Fools Day joke because the template notice spills over into visible reader space. Would have been a good one too. Happy holidays to you. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:57, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Spotify Sessions for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spotify Sessions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spotify Sessions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jc86035 (talk) 12:24, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sonder Kfz-1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hartmannsdorf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

New Page Review Newsletter No.10[edit]

Hello In ictu oculi, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

  • ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing

  • Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

  • While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News

  • The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Paloma brava (film) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paloma brava (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paloma brava (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk 15:47, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

9pm listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 9pm. Since you had some involvement with the 9pm redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:47, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Mackey Lomasney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Fleming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Factory (album) listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Factory (album). Since you had some involvement with the Factory (album) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Polyamorph (talk) 17:34, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Move of Transatlanticism[edit]

Quick question – what was the purpose of moving the page Transatlanticism (album) from Transatlanticism to its current location? Seems to me that the extra disambiguation isn't necessary. Conifer (talk) 20:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

A 97-charting US Billboard album doesn't displace Transatlanticism (culture) or Transatlanticism (politics) from real world meaning. There are two or more schools of thought about what Wikipedia is however. By all means move the album after checking Google Books is you think justified. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:19, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Okay, it seems like the term is most commonly used when referencing the album – so I'm going to move the album back to Transatlanticism and add a hatnote. [[User:Conifer|<span style="color:forestgreen;font-

Transatlanticism (politics) listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Transatlanticism (politics). Since you had some involvement with the Transatlanticism (politics) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 03:03, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Renaming discussion[edit]

I'd love to get your opinion on this discussion: Talk:Green Park tube station bombing. --Gateshead001 (talk) 23:57, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018[edit]

Hello In ictu oculi, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

  • WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags

  • Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:

  • A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons

  • There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy

  • Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

  • The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
  • Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English

  • A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.

News

  • Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
  • The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Season pass (winter sports) redirect[edit]

Hello again In ictu oculi,

I commented on this in the Season pass requested move, but do you think the redirect you made for winter sports is worthwhile? I'm skeptical, myself - seems to fall afoul of WP:RFD#DELETE "target article contains virtually no information on the subject." Season ticket doesn't currently talk about the likes of seasonal lift passes for a ski resort, and more generally, I don't think it ever will - it's just not a very interesting subject, with little written on it. Would you be willing to reconsider that redirect's creation and {{Db-author}} it? SnowFire (talk) 22:16, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

The bytes you just used to say that no source exists were less than it took to locate an article on the subject and add the main point to the article. I'm just saying :) In ictu oculi (talk) 08:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive[edit]

Hello In ictu oculi, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

  • As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
  • Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: 100 review coin, 250 review coin, 500 review coin, 1000 review certificate.
  • Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

moe. (band) page[edit]

Would you be able to revise your opinion, please? The moe. page should be moved, per Wikipedia's rules (MOS). The band's name is moe., and it is listed in all lowercase letters with the period. It also follows the same rules as bill bissett, danah boyd, k.d. lang, and the example article of deadmau5. Should we instead focus on moving those people to "capitalized" articles? 208.44.170.115 (talk) 17:52, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fallen Angels (Fallen Angels album)[edit]

Notice

The article Fallen Angels (Fallen Angels album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to fail WP:NALBUM and WP:MUSICBIO. The title is a hard one to search for.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:36, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Fallen Angels (Fallen Angels album) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fallen Angels (Fallen Angels album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fallen Angels (Fallen Angels album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:19, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Anaconda (The Sisters Of Mercy song).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anaconda (The Sisters Of Mercy song).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Anaconda (The Sisters of Mercy song) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anaconda (The Sisters of Mercy song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anaconda (The Sisters of Mercy song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 21:41, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Wasfi Kani[edit]

Hello, and well done for starting the article on Wasfi Kani. I have for the time being removed your claim that she was married to Stephen Tumim as I think it is incorrect and I can see no evidence for it at the article you cite. I know WP is not itself an RS but the Tumim article doesn't help in this direction either; finally, his Guardian obit supports the idea that he remained married to Winifred, not Wasfi. Hope this helps, best wishes DBaK (talk) 10:08, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. You're correct. That was a mistake based on an unfortunate misreading of the https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/how-we-met-sir-stephen-tumim-and-wasfi-kani-1172214.html In ictu oculi (talk) 11:48, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you so much for the nice response. Have a great weekend! Cheers DBaK (talk) 17:22, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Modulations.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Modulations.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:05, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Anaconda (The Sisters Of Mercy song).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anaconda (The Sisters Of Mercy song).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018[edit]

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (Purge)

Hello In ictu oculi, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

June backlog drive

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.

New technology, new rules
  • New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
  • Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
  • Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.
Editathons
  • Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
The Signpost
  • The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Excess Baggage (1933 film).jpg[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:14, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Excess Baggage (1933 film).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Excess Baggage (1933 film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

That's It listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect That's It. Since you had some involvement with the That's It redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ssjhowarthisawesome (talk) 14:42, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Memory Man[edit]

There should be no links to disambiguation pages, so now that you made Memory Man a dab page, would you please follow up and fix all the incoming links? (DisamAssist, Dabfix and Dabsolver are helpful.) Thanks. — Gorthian (talk) 21:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Angel (British band) for Deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angel (British band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted, mostly based on the following guidelines: WP:OR, WP:N, WP:NMUSIC, WP:V and WP:GNG.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel (British band) until a consensus is reached, based on opinion and logic, not on tally of votes. Any user (including you) may contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. Please do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Redditaddict69 11:56, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:19th-century Hebrew Christian movement has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:19th-century Hebrew Christian movement, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:24, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fundisha[edit]

Notice

The article Fundisha has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 16:10, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Unlikely[edit]

Do you think this should be a DAB? Crouch, Swale (talk) 07:38, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cuesta abajo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gardel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Fundisha for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fundisha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fundisha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 15:16, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 4[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Rudd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Skinner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Coyright violation?[edit]

Hi, I've just deleted The Cathedral (Honchar novel), a page you created yesterday, as a copyright violation. Please don't copy text without attribution (if attribution is sufficient) or without thoroughly rewriting it (if the text is not released under a license where attribution is enough). You were warned about this by Diannaa in Februari 2017 and in August 2017, so you may consider this a final warning. Fram (talk) 08:43, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

@Fram: You're right. I was intending to rewrite those two sentences from the author article to the book, but got distracted and forgot. My apologies. Are we good? Would you object if I start the book article again? In ictu oculi (talk) 09:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
No, no reason why the book couldn't have an article (or why you couldn't write it), I presume it is notable (haven't really checked it, but the censure thing seemed to point to clear notability). Fram (talk) 09:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
It's Honchar's best known work. Thank you. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:20, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Conclusion - as with previous it was actually goodreads copying the same bit of Wikipedia I had moved, not me copying goodreads In ictu oculi (talk) 11:06, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cathedral (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Tal Vez (Marta Sánchez song) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tal Vez (Marta Sánchez song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tal Vez (Marta Sánchez song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:45, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Columbus[edit]

Is there any other opera named Columbus? If not, please revert the changes. If yes, please move to Columbus (Egk). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:49, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Columbus (Herzogenberg) an oratorio. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:37, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
I don't see why change if there's no other opera. The other could be Columbus (oratorio), as long as only one. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:06, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Well there are other long scale works recorded, and there are other operas. When I created Columbus (Egk) I should have just had it as (Egk) not (opera), and now the Herzogenberg recording is coming out I think it's time to rectify that. Plus the Herzogenberg although an oratorio is technically labelled a choral cantata. So composer names work better. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:23, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
I disagree, because most people will not know these composers, but rather know what to expect when reading opera or oratorio. Or we would have Siegfried (Wagner) as the article title but don't. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:40, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Hoax warning[edit]

Stop icon

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Tal Vez (Marta Sánchez song). If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with blocks or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Fram (talk) 11:22, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

That was a good faith filling of a gap based on available information from Spanish wikipedia. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:24, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Your replies at the AfD and actions to save the article do not indicate any "good faith filing" but a desire to keep incorrect information at all costs. When information is challenged, and you are not trying to protect a hoax, you don't oppose deletion based on "what Spanish-language 90's chart books did you consult?" when you have not consulted any yourself, nor on Wikipedia mirrors / self-published sites like Prezi, not on other languages versions of Wikipedia. You don't dismiss reliable evidence which directly contradicts your info (like the Billboard source, or discogs). Your actions show a very worrying attitude which is not compatible with editing Wikipedia. Fram (talk) 11:40, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
I hope anyone looking at that AfD will see me responding to your initial post in good faith, and then fully retreating, capitulating, and saying God bless you again in good faith. Please have a nice day. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:45, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Your definition of "good faith" is opposing the deletion and asking whether I have consulted sources which you, the creator of the article, obviously never consulted in the first place, and have not provided since? That's not good faith, that's attacking the person actually uncovering the incorrect information you added, adding in your "oppose" a Spanish line which supposedly supports your position ("Un segundo sencillo, "Tal Vez", fue provisto por Thomas Anders") but which seems to come literally out of nowhere, and to the article an unreliable source to do the same. What exactly in all this is a good faith response to my initial post? You didn't address the actual concerns at all, only posted a very defensive "oppose". When you oppose the deletion of unverifiable and apparently wrong contents, then it is no longer a mistake but the defense of your own hoax. Fram (talk) 11:55, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Removal of some of your user rights proposed[edit]

See WP:AN#Proposal to remove some userrights. Fram (talk) 13:42, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018[edit]

Hello In ictu oculi, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.

Project news
As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.
Other
Moving to Draft and Page Mover
  • Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
  • If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
  • Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
  • The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
  • The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.
List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing

  • Twinkle provides a lot of the same functionality as the page curation tools, and some reviewers prefer to use the Twinkle tools for some/all tasks. It can be activated simply in the gadgets section of 'preferences'. There are also a lot of options available at the Twinkle preferences panel after you install the gadget.
  • In terms of other gadgets for NPR, HotCat is worth turning on. It allows you to easily add, remove, and change categories on a page, with name suggestions.
  • MoreMenu also adds a bunch of very useful links for diagnosing and fixing page issues.
  • User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js(info): Installing scripts doesn't have to be complicated. Go to your common.js and copy importScript( 'User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js' ); into an empty line, now you can install all other scripts with the click of a button from the script page! (Note you need to be at the ".js" page for the script for the install button to appear, not the information page)
  • User:TheJosh/Scripts/NewPagePatrol.js(info): Creates a scrolling new pages list at the left side of the page. You can change the number of pages shown by adding the following to the next line on your common.js page (immediately after the line importing this script): npp_num_pages=20; (Recommended 20, but you can use any number from 1 to 50).
  • User:Primefac/revdel.js(info): Is requesting revdel complicated and time consuming? This script helps simplify the process. Just have the Copyvio source URL and go to the history page and collect your diff IDs and you can drop them into the script Popups and it will create a revdel request for you.
  • User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js(info): Creates a "Page Curation" link to Special:NewPagesFeed up near your sandbox link.
  • User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/deletionFinder.js: Creates links next to the title of each page which show up if it has been previously deleted or nominated for deletion.
  • User:Evad37/rater.js(info): A fantastic tool for adding WikiProject templates to article talk pages. If you add: rater_autostartNamespaces = 0; to the next line on your common.js, the prompt will pop up automatically if a page has no Wikiproject templates on the talk page (note: this can be a bit annoying if you review redirects or dab pages commonly).

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

I found a possible Kauffner sock[edit]

Hiya, In ictu oculi - I found a possible Kauffner sock. Could you check that I've not gotten it wrong? The suspected sock in question is: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Nine_Zulu_queens&offset=&limit=500&target=Nine+Zulu+queens - it raises my "sock-radar". They share very similar interests and the jokey username is a staple of Kauffner's socks. Plus, I don't know of any editor aside from Kauffner who has an interest in Christmas, Islam, Asia, and US style conservatism, and certainly not all four at the same time. Lolifan (talk) 19:01, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Good catch. It's quacking pretty loud. I'll start an SPI, please weigh in.--Cúchullain t/c 19:33, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Yes I'd noticed it before but not had the energy or stomach to go after it. The Talk:Anchorage mention of Britannica was obvious enough. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:21, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:WikiProject Senegal[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:WikiProject Senegal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:49, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:WikiProject Mali[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:WikiProject Mali requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:51, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Gambia[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:WikiProject Gambia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:57, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bandito (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mario Merola
TU (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Juan Camacho

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Misdeal (cards)[edit]

Notice

The article Misdeal (cards) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

DICDEF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guy (Help!) 22:01, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Misdeal (cards) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Misdeal (cards) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misdeal (cards) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 09:39, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tal Vez (Marta Sánchez song).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tal Vez (Marta Sánchez song).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Johannes Bünderlin[edit]

Hi, I went to create an article for Johannes Bünderlin, but it seems that you started an article back in 2011 and it is locked in your sandbox. Can you create the article so I can add biographical information to it, based on "Spiritual Reformers in the 16th and 17th Centuries" by Rufus M. Jones. I have the material all written up, just needs to be added to the article. thanks - Epinoia (talk) 03:13, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

It's a stub in article space, go for it. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:29, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! - our sources seem to disagree on a few points - I'll try to do more research and straighten it out - Epinoia (talk) 14:15, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Light Up the Night (Boyzone song).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Light Up the Night (Boyzone song).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ¿Dónde estás corazón? (tango)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ¿Dónde estás corazón? (tango) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ♠PMC(talk) 12:14, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Malena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Río Cuarto
Way (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Way

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of The Performers (band) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Performers (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Performers (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Anne Delong (talk) 02:08, 19 October 2018 (UTC)