User talk:Infantom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

July 2014[edit]

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Infantom (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)


Request reason:

I noticed the accusation was found to be wrong[1], can you please unblock me now? Infantom (talk) 1:14 pm, 15 July 2014, last Tuesday (2 days ago) (UTC+1)

Accept reason:

Given the CU evidence and the fact that Callanecc has chosen to unblock the only alleged sock, I see no reason for this account to remain blocked. Yunshui  10:12, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Infantom. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 02:24, 17 April 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

On Modern Hebrew Origins[edit]

Hey there! I noticed that you made similar comments to mine on Talk:Modern Hebrew, before I did, you and many others. I'm trying to finally resolve the serious problems with the article. I thought you might be interested because your concerns could finally be addressed. --Monochrome_Monitor 21:12, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Reviving the terrible debate at Jews[edit]

Have you thought it through? It would be odd to include all those in Jewish households as Jews, even if they don't identify as such. In contrast, the other figure includes self-identified jews who aren't recongized and people with jewish parents. --Monochrome_Monitor 04:51, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Notification[edit]

Nishidani has continued the debate at Talk:Jews#Cite_grouping at another forum, namely Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#Definition_of_Jews._Gross_original_research.2FWP:SYNTH_violation, the WP:NOR noticeboard. Since you have commented at the first discussion, but not (yet) at the second, I thought I'd bring this to your attention, in case you would like to comment there as well. Debresser (talk) 20:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Reversion at Jews[edit]

Ref your reversion. The Merneptah Stele should not be described as 'discoveries'. The plural reference is incorrect. it is a discovery,Johnmcintyre1959 (talk) 21:48, 8 December 2015 (UTC) singular, and that is why you should restore my improved version.Johnmcintyre1959 (talk) 21:48, 8 December 2015 (UTC)