User talk:InfectedWithRage

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, InfectedWithRage, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --OpenToppedBus - My Talk 12:33, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

Hello? Fornadan (t) 10:46, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

Joseph Chamberlain[edit]

I've been watching your expansion of Joseph Chamberlain with interest, and I'm very impressed with the detail you've been adding. A few minor quibbles, though; I'm not going to fix them in the article yet, because I suspect you've got better access to the appropriate reference material than I have.

  • Please could you check the date of the founding of the NLF at Bingley Hall? 31 February can't be right!
  • I think you're wrong about Chamberlain's apprenticeship. As I understand it the Cordwainers Company is a livery company - a guild, not a business - and is concerned with all shoemaking, not just "Spanish shoes". They were the governing body of the apprenticeship, not the employer. I have to admit I don't know what sort of shoes the Chamberlain family business made.
  • I see you took out my line about Chamberlain equating Irish Home Rule with the position of London. If you're interested, the exact quote is
"I cannot admit that five millions of Irishmen have any greater right to govern themselves without regard to the rest of the United Kingdom than the five million inhabitants of the metropolis."
...from his speech at Warrington on 8 September 1885 (Chamberlain, Mr Chamberlain's Speeches ed Boyd (1914) vol I p.243.
  • Please could you fill in the edit summary? It makes it a lot easier to make sense of the page history.

Apart from that, keep up the good work. --rbrwr± 19:34, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Joe C and the Cons[edit]

Hi. You wrote in your recent edit of Chamberlain that he was not a member of the Cons. Yet the Lib Unionists and the Cons merged in 1912, and Joe the MP didn't kick the can until 1914. Just wondering if you know any details about 1912-1914, since I do not--longlivefolkmusic 00:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Mine a Million[edit]

Nuvola apps important yellow.svg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mine a Million, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Mine a Million. Mister Senseless (Speak - Contributions) 23:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Mine a Million for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mine a Million is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mine a Million until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StudiesWorld (talk) 11:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)