User talk:Intimidated

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Saddam Hussein[edit]

The repeated use of the full name "Saddam Hussein" every paragaph is bad grammar. RickK 07:53, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)

That works.  :) RickK 08:09, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)

Baked Bean Sandwich[edit]

That's one of the coolest articles I've seen in a long time. Offbeat articles are what make this site fun. - Lucky 6.9 02:17, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Well, thank you :) I have just completed the consumption of one "student style" sandwich with the provided recipe ;)

Communism[edit]

I had already started a discussion on the free market communist section in the discussion portion of the communist page. I believe the part fits quiet well to elucidate the drastic change that communism has made. Especially if communists like Nati can claim that communism as practiced isnt real communism thus skirting any human rights violations that could be blamed upon them. She/he is ignoring the discussion. I re posted my section, after again editing it, and then asked her to see the discussion to express her concerns before deletion. We will see if she/he plays along or just delets what she/he does not like to see. Which makes the deletion a deletion for POV reasons. (Gibby 08:30, 11 December 2005 (UTC))


Tea cake accompaniment anomaly[edit]

Hi. I see that you took the photo of the tea cake (well done), and gave it a caption of "A toasted teacake with tea." That beverage looks more like hot chocolate to me. Would you kindly confirm that it really is tea? --Heron 22:26, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Thompson (2nd nomination)[edit]

Your assertion that the article was to promote the band isn't sound. The band is no longer together, so there's nothing to promote. Either way, the band had multiple singles with a notable label, so the band itself would be notable. Would you consider merging or redirecting instead? (For more info, see my comment at the AFD) - Mgm|(talk) 21:54, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

  • Yes, I agree, a merge would be more appropriate in this case, however we should let the voting complete to get consensus --Intimidatedtalk 07:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)