- 1 Votestacking in discussion of Articles for deletion/Nigma Talib
- 2 Notice of incident noticeboard discussion about your votestacking
- 3 Allude Entertainment
- 4 Speedy deletion declined: Olivia Gude
- 5 ArbCom elections are now open!
- 6 Thanks for helping me with AfD
- 7 A question
- 8 Orphaned non-free image File:This is a logo owned by Supanet Limited for Supanet.png
- 9 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
- 10 Old news is new news
- 11 Sockpuppet investigation
Votestacking in discussion of Articles for deletion/Nigma Talib
It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Nigma Talib. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. User has solicited votes from editors with a known stance on the notability of an article currently considered for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nigma_Talib Delta13C (talk) 09:18, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
Notice of incident noticeboard discussion about your votestacking
Hi there! I've edited the talk page for Allude, stating why the content is notable. Did you need more citations to back up the claims? Let me know! Thanks! TinyZee27 (talk) 20:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Olivia Gude
Hello Ireneshih. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Olivia Gude, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is enough assertion of importance here to pass the low bar of A7. Consider AfD, but perhaps wait to see whether the article developes. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 12:26, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for helping me with AfD
Orphaned non-free image File:This is a logo owned by Supanet Limited for Supanet.png
Thanks for uploading File:This is a logo owned by Supanet Limited for Supanet.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Old news is new news
Thought you ought to know you've been mentioned, very indirectly, in an article at Bloomberg, as having tagged a new article for deletion, only five minutes after it was created. It is the central thread in their article. What individual editors do here affects Wikipedia. Shenme (talk) 19:03, 24 December 2016 (UTC)