User talk:Ireneshih

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Votestacking in discussion of Articles for deletion/Nigma Talib[edit]

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Nigma Talib. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. User has solicited votes from editors with a known stance on the notability of an article currently considered for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nigma_Talib Delta13C (talk) 09:18, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Notice of incident noticeboard discussion about your votestacking[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Delta13C (talk) 10:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Allude Entertainment[edit]

Hi there! I've edited the talk page for Allude, stating why the content is notable. Did you need more citations to back up the claims? Let me know! Thanks! TinyZee27 (talk) 20:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Olivia Gude[edit]

Hello Ireneshih. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Olivia Gude, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is enough assertion of importance here to pass the low bar of A7. Consider AfD, but perhaps wait to see whether the article developes. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 12:26, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for helping me with AfD[edit]

New to the process.. Thank you for letting me know about the AfD on the Rhonda Patrick article. I'm leaving a comment now. All the best... Snazzywiki (talk) 22:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

A question[edit]

Are you paid for any of your editing, or is your editing in any way related to work for which you are paid? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 22:12, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

JamesBWatson, If I am paid for any editing I will be disclosing it on the relevant page, I want to know which edits looks promotional or paid editing. I will be happy to discuss them. Ireneshih (talk) 06:48, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:This is a logo owned by Supanet Limited for Supanet.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:This is a logo owned by Supanet Limited for Supanet.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Ireneshih. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Old news is new news[edit]

Thought you ought to know you've been mentioned, very indirectly, in an article at Bloomberg, as having tagged a new article for deletion, only five minutes after it was created. It is the central thread in their article. What individual editors do here affects Wikipedia. Shenme (talk) 19:03, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Well, I for one came by to see what was up with that. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 15:05, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Me too, FWIW. I then worked on improving the article in question, Bisi Adeleye-Fayemi. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 22:06, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kavdiamanju, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SmartSE (talk) 21:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)