User talk:Izac Cobain Johns.

Welcome!

Hello, Izac Cobain Johns., and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as N-O-M-A (band), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Everymorning talk 03:25, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of N-O-M-A (band)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on N-O-M-A (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Everymorning talk 03:25, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of N-O-M-A (band)

Hello Izac Cobain Johns.,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged N-O-M-A (band) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Fylbecatulous talk 13:48, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm Gaff. An edit that you recently made to System of a Down seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Gaff (talk) 04:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Razorblade Suitcase. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Gaff (talk) 05:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of N-O-M-A

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on N-O-M-A requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — MusikAnimal ^talk 19:32, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I know you are creating these articles in good-faith. Unfortunately however, not everything can be on Wikipedia. We have a notability guideline that must be met in order for articles to be retained. Otherwise Wikipedia would grow into a monstrosity of indiscrete information, with bands and companies utilizing its powerful search engine presence for promotion. Your articles also seemed to be a bit promotional, which raises these same concerns. Just understand your willingness and initiative to contribute to this project is still much appreciated. For more information on the notability guideline, see WP:BAND. Thanks and let me know if you have any questions. — MusikAnimal ^talk 19:38, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm Kranix. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nirvana (band), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

February 2016

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Motörhead, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 17:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Paranoid (Black Sabbath song), you may be blocked from editing. Mlpearc (open channel) 17:49, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Genres

Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 17:50, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genre in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Grindcore. Mlpearc (open channel) 17:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 20:48, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Speed metal may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Infobox music genre

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:38, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Hardcore punk, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 22:23, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rock music may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

] (such as [[Crass (band)|Crass]]), [[grindcore]] (such as [[Napalm Death]]), and [[crust punk]] (such as [[Aus-Rotten]].<ref>T. Gosling, "'Not for sale': The Underground network of Anarcho-punk"

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genre in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Hardcore punk. Binksternet (talk) 15:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genre in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Mercyful Fate. Peter Sam Fan 12:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genre in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Aus-Rotten. Peter Sam Fan 12:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to New Wave of British Heavy Metal may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|other_topics = [[NWOAHM]]}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:50, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Findaway (Silverchair song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Findaway (Silverchair song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Findaway (Silverchair song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Binksternet (talk) 13:04, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Hardcore punk with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:24, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hardcore punk with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Raw Power, you may be blocked from editing. Feinoha ^Talk 00:30, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Feinoha ^Talk 00:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 01:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Punk rock

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Punk rock. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:32, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Punk rock. Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:05, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Smells Like Teen Spirit, you may be blocked from editing. Opencooper (talk) 16:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rock music. Sundayclose (talk) 14:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Nirvana (band). Mlpearc Phone (open channel) 03:15, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]