User talk:JC7V7DC5768

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

La-Chun Lindsay[edit]

Thanks for the name swap - you are fast I had just noticed it and was trying to figure out how to change it. BW Nejaby (talk) 19:55, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

submitting on behalf of another user[edit]

You can put a user= parameter in the submit template. This will cause the review notices to go the user you designate rather than to you. Maybe you already knew this and just forgot in the case of Draft:Pierre O'Rourke, in which case I apologize for the unneeded advice. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 02:50, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

@Jmcgnh: Yeah I made an error with the submitting. I won't let it happen again. Thanks for the feedback. JC7V-constructive zone 03:00, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Maxmoefoe page[edit]

Hey, I just made a page for maxmoefoe on my sandbox but I seem to be having trouble submitting it. Could you possibly read through it and see if there’s any issues, since you seem to active on other YouTuber’s articles and this is my first one. Thanks. Ducktech89 (talk) 11:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

  • Ducktech89 I've move it into draft space (but it's not submitted yet for review). The problem with your draft is there are youtube and twitter sources in it and those are unreliable sources (and primary sources to boot). Please read WP:RS for what sources you can use and read WP:RSP for what sources you can't use. You should find sources from newspapers, books, magazines in particular. The wrestling section draft sources are fine but maybe a few more up there wouldn't hurt. When you've fixed these issues, I'll submit it for you. JC7V-talk 15:28, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

I’ve tried to find reliable sources, but I can’t find many. I mainly just used things Max has said and used those as sources, but there’s no completely stable source stating where he's from, his age just Wikitubia and things of the like. I just had to sort of connect the dots. Ducktech89(talk) 12:05, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

  • Ducktech89 Hello, for Maxmoefoe, on google search there are some references from reliable sources you can use for the draft on him but they are mostly of the passing mention variety (which doesn't establish notability). And another reference to him from the Daily Mail which as a source is blacklisted. If you can't find reliable sources to show that he meets WP:V or to show he meets WP:GNG or any of its sub categories, it means he unfortunately isn't notable enough (at least now) for inclusion. To see what type of sources you need for the Maxmoefoe , see Jenna Marbles's article. She is also a youtuber like Maxmoefoe and yet her article clearly shows notability and the sources provided meet WP:V. Good luck and you are on the right track. I've also split the drafts into two separate drafts since you had Dave Finley III and Max's draft together as one draft which is against policy (I missed that during the user space to draft move). JC7V-talk 00:51 (updated), 23 October 2018 (UTC)

What I'm trying to get at is if Maxmoefoe is trurly notable enough for inclusion, you should be able to find some reliable sources to backup things like where he's from and his age (for the most part.). Check out PewDiePie's article. There is a Washington Post reference to his dad's job, a Rolling Stone reference about his childhood etc. It maybe a case of too soon for Max. JC7V-talk 00:55, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

  • Ducktech89 Also see WP:NOYT, you can use youtube or Twitter as sources rarely and under very specific circumstances, so balance that advice with the advice above I gave you. Good luck. JC7V-talk 18:33, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Ref: Seema Bhatnagar[edit]


There are 2 scientist by the name of Seema Bhatnagar. This one is based out of India, and is in the field of Drug Discovery. here research data is available on

The other one is based is US, and currently working with the Children Hospital in Philadelphia, United States. Her research data is available on

Please do not add here data to this profile, as can create problems to both of them.

Thanks you, — Preceding unsigned comment added by A1bhatna (talkcontribs) 03:22, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. I replied to this on your talk page. Happy editing. JC7V-talk 03:31, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Kendall Vertes[edit]

Hi! This is the first time I've worked on a wikipage, and I was wondering what your deletion reason meant. What is "create portected"? I'd love to create this page if possible. Thanks!--Ameliemacp (talk) 05:24, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. JC7V-talk 06:06, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

New Page Patrol[edit]

Hi there,

I got your email and I'm happy to help. While we don't really have a school as such, I'd be happy to help with any questions you might have. I'm available via chatting on my talkpage of course, and I'm also often on the NPP discord channel ([1]). Your CSD log does look quite good, and I think if you went to PERM right now you'd be approved on that alone, so feel free to apply whenever. I'd suggest checking out the list of gadgets and scripts located here: Wikipedia_talk:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers#Full_recommended_gadget/script_list and installing them, as they are quite useful to NPP and AfC, both before and after the userright. My timezone is UTC (United Kingdom), so currently heading off to bed shortly but I'll be available tomorrow if you want to chat. Cheers, — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 21:31, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

I'd suggest spending a bit of time over at WP:AfD. It is the single best place to learn the notability guidelines though and through, and always needs more help. I'd start with older discussions that already have a few !votes. This is probably the most productive way to get up skilled. The only other suggestion is to slow down a bit, be a bit more careful, and always explain yourself in edit summaries as much as possible (which helps eliminate confusion when you make mistakes). Hope to see you at NPP sometime in the future. Always available for a second opinion though. Cheers, — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 21:38, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Request on 11:12:09, 29 October 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by JennS2018[edit]

JennS2018 (talk) 11:12, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I have been editing a page about the company Icecat over and over again, however there seems to be always something missing.Could I please have some help with further editing in according to the rules of Wikipedia.

Replied on your talk page. JC7V-talk 16:16, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Ron S. Jarmin[edit]

Hi - I saw a notation that you edited this article 5 days ago but couldn't tell if you'd made any edits or if it had advanced to acceptance stage. Can you tell me of any status update? --Shel5136 (talk) 18:23, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

  • @Shel5136: Hi, thanks for asking me about it. I just added some sources to the draft to improve it. I am not reviewing it because I can't really tell if it should be accepted or not. When another reviewer accepts, declines or comments further on your draft, you'll be notified. You are free to keep working on your draft in the mean time to find better sources and more sources. Cheers. JC7V-talk 18:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Hi JC7V7DC5768! Thank you for paying attention to my request for help. But so far nobody has told me whether it is notability or not. I will be very grateful to you if you can say your opinion, regarding its notability, whether I should write such articles or not. Thank you! Aspireforintelligence (talk) 21:43, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

@Aspireforintelligence: Hi, a non admin AFC reviewer (like me) can't accept the draft since it is moved protected. While I am glad that you seek feedback, you are forum shopping (asking various editors to review the draft instead of waiting for it to be reviewed the natural way) and that's frowned upon here. Wait for a reviewer to review your draft and if it is declined, follow the advice he or she gives you in the decline/comment section. Thank you. JC7V-talk 22:02, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback. I understand that you cannot move it, but you can appreciate it for notability, for example in this comment, that would be enough for me. Aspireforintelligence (talk) 22:32, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 :: @Aspireforintelligence: Whether I believe the subject of your draft is notable or not doesn't matter since the only thing that matters is if the reviewer who reviews your draft thinks it is notable for inclusion. I appreciate your efforts and you seem like a good writer. If your draft is declined ,don't leave the site ,but read WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG and find subjects which clearly pass at least one of those criterias and that you want to write about. Also you have to write your draft in a NPOV sort of way. If it's biased, even if notable it will be declined. See the template in the decline of your draft from the 25th to see what I mean. Cheers. JC7V-talk 22:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, I do translations articles often, and sometimes I try to write. Here's how in the latter case, my article was checked, and when I turned to the administrator for recommendations, he transferred it to a draft, believing that I was getting paid for the work. I explained that it is not. He agrees to remove the protection if someone also considers the article as Notability. That's why I asked you to rate my article. But it looks like everybody is angry. Thank you for explaining to me why this is happening. Aspireforintelligence (talk) 23:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
@Aspireforintelligence: We're not angry, you just have to wait until a reviewer reviews your draft and either accepts or declines it. If its a decline, you have to follow the advice in the template that is used for draft declines. JC7V-talk 00:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Need help for further editing[edit]

Extended content

Can you please help me out how I can draft it for resubmission. And what this comment means? Symbol opinion vote.svg Comment: Weasel words and words to watch are all over this draft. Please fix these issues. I'll be glad to help if you need it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victorghoshe11 (talkcontribs) 12:56, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. JC7V-talk 15:44, 30 October 2018 (UTC)


Hi Darrinisnothere (talk) 19:02, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Not hurrasment[edit]

NOT Darrinisnothere (talk) 19:03, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

@Darrinisnothere: Hello, your message on Dreamy Jazz's talk page violated talk page policies so it was removed, see WP:USERPAGE. JC7V-talk 19:04, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Good to see you on the Huggle IRC. Keep up your great work! I will return to it soon :) Abelmoschus Esculentus 14:32, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
  • @Abelmoschus Esculentus: Thanks for the barnstar, you've been doing great too. Keep up the good work. We can use all the help that we can get. JC7V-talk 14:35, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Your Call Football at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 15:34, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

from my WikiProject Abandoned Drafts days

Your submission at Articles for creation: Holly Farrell has been accepted[edit]

Holly Farrell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ProgrammingGeek talktome 15:49, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Please undelete HPEV Solar Fuel Cell article.[edit]

Kind thanks. RobertBercovitz (talk) 19:39, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

@RobertBercovitz: Hello Robert, thank you for reaching out. Editors who want their articles undeleted go here: Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion and request it with a valid reason. However, HPEV Solar Fuel Cell still exists in draft form. So i suggest you work on that draft until it is ready and then you submit to via WP:Articles for Creation. Instructions on how to do so can be found there. Cheers. JC7V-talk 20:03, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

___ Greatly appreciate the feedback, @JC7V7DC5768:. Will do.


  • @Mz7: Hello, my rollback trial is about to expire and you said to ping you after a month and if everything looked ok, I'd get to keep my rollback rights. So can you please review my counter vandalism work I've done while I've had rollback and then tell me if I can keep it or not? Thank you for your consideration. JC7V-talk 20:35, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
 Done Mz7 (talk) 22:43, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

Re: Suriname at the CONCACAF Gold Cup[edit]

Hi! Thanks for the reply and the suggestion. However, now without the overview it was promptly moved into draftspace due to lack of citations. :D

I think it looks better if the article provides a little more context and is more fleshed out like that, as well. I'll take care of it tomorrow though.

Working on Trinidad already. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Storkenleg (talkcontribs) 22:19, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Good luck on your draft/article work in the future. If you want to find reliable sources, check out this search engine]. JC7V-talk 22:29, 3 November 2018 (UTC)


Hi, you just reject my page (Valentina Lombardo) i read your guidelines: And seems that the subject is notable because follow the criteria 4 in the paragraph "Criteria for musicians". (LA STAMPA one of the most famous italian newspaper) LINK: Can you approve the page? thanks (Valelombardo (talk) 16:53, 6 November 2018 (UTC))

  • @Valelombardo: Hello, thanks for reaching out. While that maybe a reliable source, it is not enough to show notability as it just an announcement of one of Valentina's concerts (ie it's routine coverage). To show that Valentina is notable enough for inclusion, the should mention Valentina a paragraph or more and be independent of her. A story or in dept review of one of her shows for example would be something to show substantial coverage from a reliable source. See this article's references for the type you need to show in Valentina's article. Work on these issues and fix them, resubmit and someone will review the draft again .Cheers. JC7V-talk 16:58, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Excellent job! Jebcubed (talk) 18:18, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank you, keep up the good work too. JC7V-talk 18:20, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

I'll move the links for Desert Gold[edit]

Just to let you know, I'll repoint the links for Desert Gold to Desert Gold (horse) as you don't have AWB perms. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 23:27, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

 Done Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 23:36, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! JC7V-talk 23:55, 6 November 2018 (UTC)


Thanks for your email. I agree that text looks rather suspicious but I can't find a source for it either so I'm not going to do a revdel. The important thing is that it was removed though, so thanks for that. Hut 8.5 21:27, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Revdel request[edit]

Thanks for identifying an article which may need revision deletion:Shattered Grid, but you did not identify the source which had been copied.--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:49, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Sphilbrick, Hi, the copy pasted material in the Shattered Grid plot section came from here and here . Thanks

Article Submit - Musician[edit]


Recently you have deleted a draft on Ganesh Chandrasekaran citing notability. I went through the references and the person is largely notable with this debut film where he has collaborated with leading artists. Further there are many references where he has been mentioned, not just passing references. As a wikipedian, I request you to go through his profile and consider a submission. Here is another reference I have found on his name.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 15:09, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for reaching out. The article on Ganesh was deleted via a deletion discussion about 2 months ago and since the Ganesh draft was identical to the Ganesh article when it was decided upon by consensus to be deleted, it had to be declined. You can keep adding sources (somewhat more than a few) to ithe draft (WP:RS and WP:IS ie reliable, independent sources) and let another reviewer review it which you should do so it won't be declined again . Good luck. JC7V-talk 16:15, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Genevieve Clarke[edit]

Hello JC7V7DC5768, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Genevieve Clarke, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Remove G12; the aaforringer page is a mirror of Jessica Alba, where this content is copied from, and a "lack of attribution" is not enough for G12 to apply per WP:CSD. Replacing with G3. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:37, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for correcting that. Keep up the good work too!!JC7V-talk 20:43, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Mount Dora High School[edit]

Thanks for creating Mount Dora High School.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 06:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Dorothy Jean Hailes) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Dorothy Jean Hailes.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Good work overall. I've made some copy-edits to the article, mostly grammar fixes and rewordings for clarity and tone. You might want to look at the edits I've made so that your future articles can be even better. Let me know if there are any edits I made that you don't like. :-)

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 18:33, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

WP:RM/TR and page mover right[edit]

I see you close some RM discussion, but you also list some discussion outcome in WP:RM/TR. So I hope you request page mover rights in WP:PERM to reduce these kinds of listings and these mean less arguments in WP:RM/TR, thanks Hhkohh (talk) 08:12, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I've closed a fair amount of Requested moves and subsequently made requests for moves I closed as moves at WP:RM/TR for all of the closed moves I couldn't move myself. I agree that the page mover right would help me in this task, but I haven't met the 6 month minimum requirement for it. JC7V (talk) 22:39, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Ref: Nizar El Fakih[edit]


Thank you for reviewing the article submission of Nizar El Fakih. I appreciate that a lot.

I'm curious about the two things you commented: 1) Drop the high amount of quotes and 2) Trim the interviews and collaboration the subject has had with the media.

I've always thought that everything I write in Wikipedia must come from a proven or legit source, so why you suggest I should drop the amount of quotes? How should I do it? Which criteria you recommend me to use when doing this?

Then, about trimming the interviews and collaborations... why you recommended this? How should I do it?

Thank you very much for your time.

Alams. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:43, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi thanks for reaching out. see WP:QUOTEFARM. While some quotes are fine, long quotations or too much quotations crowd up the article/draft and take away attention to other info Sometimes it better to summarize the paraphrase . Also you want as many independent sources as possible (see WP:IS. Interviews by the subject maybe good for verifying certain things but for notability establishing, you should go for sources which speak about the subject without him being interviewed, sources that aren't press releases (ie a newspaper article about a controversy the subject was involved in, non routine story(s) about the subject etc) If you need more help see the Help Desk. Good luck. JC7V (talk) 15:56, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, JC7V7DC5768. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

November 19 2018[edit]

Thank you for moving Lamella structures to draft space. I'm new to this and didn't really know where to put it as a starting point. Hab044 (talk) 02:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Hab044 No problem, I'm glad to help. If you need anymore help, ask me or see the Teahouse or help desk. JC7V (talk) 02:42, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Stop draftifying junk[edit]

I've noticed a few problems with article you are draftifying. Let's take Draft:Alice Kimball Smith. First of all, it is completely inappropriate to move this article to draft with the summary "Undersourced, incubate in draftspace". This is obviously not the issue with this page, and using false edit summaries is problematic. Second, the criteria in WP:DRAFTiFY includes "do not draftify junk". This article should have been deleted under CSD A3. It contains nothing but the title repeated as its only content. This is not the only page I've come across today that you have drafitified erroneously. Natureium (talk) 04:04, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your concerns and NPP. Alice Kimball Smith was notable (per searches and criteria) that's why I draftified it. I've fixed the draft up and moved it to mainspace. For Photographic communication, I left the author a note on their talk page asking them to rewrite it in a way to meet Wikipedia's policies. I was going to CSD the draft under G11 if they didn't begin to do so in 3 days. I wouldn't have used 'not an essay' as my CSD criteria in the CSD because CSD doesn't really apply to essays since failed criteria says What Wikipedia is Not articles/drafts aren't really eligible to be deleted under CSD. So I wouldn't have used 'multiple criteria' in my CSD tag of it. Also see User_talk:Sgflowers1#Deleted_page, I was basically giving the user the same advice as Shalor gave to the author, though unlike Shalor, I was going to CSD it in 3 days if it remained promotional. You can see me Draftify log for more on this. I guess blowing it up and starting over right away was probably the better method (ie your way), so I guess that's something I'll look into in the future. My CSD log is filled with more than a few articles I've CSD'd under A3 and G11. With photographic communication, I saw what Shalor saw in it. JC7V (talk) 19:27, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Also, some drafts (or draftified drafts) start out as spam/promotional but eventually became more and more encyclopediac as time goes on. JC7V (talk) 01:17, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
The actual issue with the draftification was that you put a student’s project into draft space 3 minutes after it was created. I know that students aren’t technically graded on the articles they write, but let’s use some common sense here: it makes us look bad and deprived a student of the ability to do something on their own.
Also, on your later point, we delete spam when we see it, even if it is notable: something cannot pass WP:N if it fails WP:NOT, which includes NOTSPAM. We delete spam, we don’t try to make a better advertisement. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:36, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
TonyBallioni, In my comment above your comment, I was simply agreeing with something that SoWhy said last month at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion here Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G11s_in_Draft_Space . I just didn't communicate it the correct way and if I gave out any other impression with my comment above, it wasn't my intention and I apologize. JC7V (talk) 06:47, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
While SoWhy is a dear friend, he an I do often disagree. In that discussion, while I actually do agree with his broader points re: fancruft, which I don’t think qualifies for G11 and I think many people mistake for spam, I strongly disagree with the idea that actual promotional content created with solely promotional intent can be saved, and draft space should not be used as an attempt to save it. If something is promotional but doesn’t meet G11, AfD or PROD are appropriate, especially if it’s borderline or less notability. Sending it to draft for more socks to work on or recreate (which is what happens) helps no one. Natureium’s point, as well as mine, is that taking crap that should be deleted and putting it in draft space to be deleted in 6 months does no one any favours. TonyBallioni (talk) 07:00, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing article: Back_in_Time_(iOS_software)[edit]


Just want to thank you for reviewing my article It is one of my first articles and I would like to make it really good before creating a new one. I will now add some images. Any suggestions you may have on improvements are welcome.

Thanks again, --Coel Jo (talk) 09:01, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Coel Jo, Hi, congrats on your article being accepted. See WP:IUP for image uploading guidelines. You can find links for sites with public domain images at WP:PDI. Good luck JC7V (talk) 14:33, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Bread Charity page[edit]

hello can you help me make a page for our charity — Preceding unsigned comment added by M8ms2 (talkcontribs) 08:43, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

M8ms2, Hi, i'll repost what I said in the decline template to help you with your draft. "This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia." "Need more sources, ones that are reliable ,independent. See WP:RS or drop me a line and I'll point you in the right direction." . To summarize, add sources from newspapers, books ,magazines independent of the subject and non Prish that mention Bread Charity in a paragraph or more (ie more than in passing). Three or more of these sources at minimum. Please follow the above advice on your draft otherwise it will be rejected again if you resubmit it without fixing these issues. Good luck. JC7V (talk) 22:16, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Please provide independent, more than in passing coverage[edit]

Could you please see some additional cite added and see that such coverage is passing coverage! Thank you! Inntoday2018 (talk) 16:34, 25 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inntoday2018 (talkcontribs) 16:32, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Inntoday2018, Hi, another reviewer will review your draft to see if it is notable enough to be accepted (I don't review the same draft twice). Sometimes companies are notable but the draft doesn't show notability with the sourcing and so it's declined for those reasons so I will let another reviewer tell if the sourcing you provided shows if the company is notable or not. In the meantime you can keep updating your draft. A paragraph or more in a independent reliable media is the type of significant coverage in a source that shows notability. JC7V (talk) 16:40, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of PlayStation Portable[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article PlayStation Portable you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 15:40, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Your Call Football[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Your Call Football at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 18:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted[edit]

Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Hi JC7V7DC5768. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Minor user rights can now be accorded on a time limited or probationary period, so do check back at WP:PERM/NPR in case this concerns your application. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance. so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion.  Swarm  talk  00:13, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Your Call Football[edit]

Updated DYK query.svgOn 5 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Your Call Football, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the interactive game Your Call Football allows participants to call real-time plays in games featuring some former NFL and CFL players? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Your Call Football. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Your Call Football), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 12:01, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Removed Content[edit]

Hello there JC7V7DC5768, I wanted to talk to you about my edit that I have recently made. However, it is my first time editing something. The content that I removed is the following: (Lewis has also pioneered the field of onion dildonics, inasmuch as sex toys can be insecurely connected over the Internet.) The content seems like a vandalistic act. This is the reason why I edited the article.

Birdsmired (talk) 21:45, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

  • @Birdsmired: Hi, thanks for reaching out. The info you removed was sourced to UK, so it wasn't a vandalistic info but sourced info. JC7V (talk) 22:08, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

I have made my first contribution.[edit]

My first article Huzlers has been moved but how long would it take for it to be indexed? I was told it would need patrolling.

Thank you. Thelastpharoah (talk) 16:55, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Thelastpharoah, When it's reviewed by a NPR it will be on its way to being indexed. Just be patient. Happy Editing. JC7V (talk) 18:10, 7 December 2018 (UTC)


Hey, JC7V! If you get the page mover right, you can perform these moves yourself without having to rely on WP:RMT. Flooded with them hundreds 17:58, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Flooded with them hundreds, Thanks for the suggestion, I'll keep that in mind. Keep up the good work! JC7V (talk) 18:00, 8 December 2018 (UTC)


FYI, I came across this page as the creator's talk page was on my watchlist. Draft:System 001 seems very notable, lots of good coverage (which was not in the article). I added three or four good sources.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:37, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

ThatMontrealIP, Hi, after seeing the sources you've added I've accepted the draft. Thanks for informing me and helping out. JC7V (talk) 01:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you kindly. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:43, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
It turns out we were wrong on this one... it seems to duplicate The Ocean Cleanup, which contains better infomation the same thing. What do you think, move back to draft, or nominate for speedy as duplicate?
ThatMontrealIP, I suggest we take whatever is in the The Ocean Cleanup article and move it into the System 001 article while giving attrition. JC7V (talk) 05:46, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
ThatMontrealIP, I've moved the content from The Ocean Project into System 001 (while giving attrition in the edit summaries) ,fit said content into what was in the System 001 article already, while also rewriting the System 001 section of The Ocean Project article to be a summary section with a See also link to System 001. Both articles can use more cleanup so maybe you can help? Thank you. JC7V (talk) 06:39, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

WP:RM closures[edit]

Thank you for performing closures of requested move discussions. Please remember to add {{subst:RM bottom}} to the bottom of the RM discussion when performing closures. feminist (talk) 16:43, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Feminist, Sorry, I will do so in the future. Thank you for pointing this out. JC7V (talk) 16:47, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

independent sources (draft: Ritual)[edit]

Hey there,

I'm a tech-enthusiast based in Toronto, ON, Canada and still getting the hang of this Wikipedia thing to make contributions. You mentioned on a page (About Ritual App) that the main sources are Press releases and to provide secondary, independent reliable sources.

Really appreciate any guidance here and support! — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Hoovmeister 0492 (talkcontribs) 19:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

The Hoovmeister 0492, Hi thanks for reaching out. To see what kind of sources you need see WP:IRS and WP:NCORP .You need to show WP:SIGCOV and to provide sources that are independent (see WP:IS) of the Ritual App and its founders. Routine coverage like raising money isn't the type of sources desired to show notability. JC7V (talk) 19:18, 11 December 2018 (UTC)