Hi JHCaufield, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled right to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 20:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Your request for rollback
Hi JHCaufield. After reviewing your request for rollback, I haverollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 20:10, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! JHCaufield - talk - 21:38, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi, JHCaufield. You made this edit to correct a misspelling, specifically "focussed"->"focused". This is actually a dialect difference; British English (and some other Englishes, less consistently) double the last consonant when using some suffixes, including "focussing". Now I totally do not care what spelling variants are used, but some editors really, really, really care, so I thought I'd let you know before you run up against one. Official policy is to not edit war about it or gratuitously change style within an article: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Spelling. Since the article in question does not have a consistent dialect, which is my fault, there is nothing wrong with your edit, and this note is in no way intended to criticize you. HLHJ (talk) 04:02, 20 October 2017 (UTC)