User talk:JJMC89
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JJMC89. |
 | Bot-related queries:
|  |
barnstar for you
[edit]
|
The Copyright Barnstar | |
| Thanks for removing copyrighted images from my Userpage! |
Tornado Elliott (Yelp for help!) 15:02, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
Not sure I understand how an image can be OK for the Hans von Dohnanyi page but that same image is a violation and gets flagged for the Zossen documents page. Can you please clarify, as this is confusing. Thanks Obenritter (talk) 18:35, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
- So I posted what seems appropriate as non-free use rationale for the Hans von Dohnanyi image your bot flagged: (diff: Special:Diff/1353015034) at File:Hans-von-Dohnanyi low res.png.
Respectfully, I note that Dohnanyi is the article's primary subject—the compiler and custodian of the archive the article documents—and that no freely licensed equivalent photograph exists on Wikimedia Commons. The conditions for a valid non-free use rationale under WP:NFCC criterion 1 (no free equivalent), criterion 3 (minimal use), and criterion 8 (significance) are straightforwardly met, as far as I can tell.
I would appreciate your review of the filed rationale and, if acceptable, restoration of the image to the article. If there are specific deficiencies in the rationale as filed, I am happy to address them, with your help perhaps as this is outside my normal area of Wiki-editing. Thank you. --Obenritter (talk) 19:52, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) @Obenritter: I didn't realize you had also asked about this very same thing here when I responded to your question at WP:MCQ#Image usage, but basically I would've posted the same reply here as I did there. If you've got any questions about my MCQ reply, please respond there because it will help keep the discussion from fragmenting. In general, when you post a question on one page first, it's probably a good idea to wait a bit longer than about an hour before re-posting the same question on some other page. Not everyone goes by the same schedule, and sometimes it can take some time for a question to be answered. If you post something but don't get a response within a reasonable amount of time, then re-posting somewhere else might be warranted; however, it's generally always helpful if you include a link to the previous post in your re-post to let others know this has been brought up before. Doing so can help avoid repetition and confusion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:06, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. I am new to such matters on the nuances of photo use and the like. I'll refrain from involving myself in it from here forward. Too much hassle. --Obenritter (talk) 05:04, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
Listing for discussion of Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:Boilerplate text
[edit]
Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:Boilerplate text has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:43, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
Listing for discussion of Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:LaTeX symbols
[edit] Template:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:LaTeX symbols has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:45, 12 May 2026 (UTC)