User talk:JL-Bot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

WP:JCW by target[edit]

Would it be possible to have an separate type of 'Popular' pages in WP:JCW?

Something like

Rank Target Entries (Citations, Articles) Total Citations Distinct Articles
1 Astronomy and Astrophysics 3952 2230

The table would be would be populated by

  • Parse and cleanup |journal=foobar as usual. Those are "entries"
  • Determine target of foobar (e.g. follow redirects)
  • Find variants of entries that only differ by punctuation (or at least by , . : -), whitespace, capitalization, "The", or "&" vs "and".
  • Group everything that redirects or matches the target together

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:49, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Would this be a change to the current most popular or a new page? The blue links would be easy. The red links would be a bit more difficult (have to think through all the permutations). I'll give it a look... -- JLaTondre (talk) 12:57, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
This would be a new page Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Journals cited by Wikipedia/Target1, /Target2 etc. Since there will be a lot more entries per page, I suggested capping this at 100/page, and do the 1000 most popular targets. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:45, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
JLaTondre if this is a bit much to code at the moment, running the bot as is would be fine for now. It would be nice to have this running sometimes before August however, if only to help with [1]. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
The May dump is still in progress. I probably will not be able to run it until end of next week. I plan on adding in the new functionality after that run. It will be before August. -- JLaTondre (talk) 16:00, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

@JLaTondre: Any update on this? It would be nice to have a chance to review the output so the logic can be tweaked in time for Wikimania. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:36, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

It is in progress. I hope to have it complete for the July dump. -- JLaTondre (talk) 12:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
@Headbomb: I have completed the initial version. I have not yet integrated it into the main bot run, but instead manually uploaded the top 100 results to Target1. Please review and let me know what you think. If it looks good, I'll integrate into the main bot. -- JLaTondre (talk) 00:51, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Great! Will look into it tonight/over the next few days! Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:46, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
First thing that would be useful, is a breakdown of links for <5 (diff [2]). Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:51, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
That's an easy one. Example updated. -- JLaTondre (talk) 00:59, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
@JLaTondre: After toying with this a bit, I have a few ideas (e.g. color-coding the target/individual links like we do similar to Popular1), but it would require templatifying things and I have no time to do this right now. The logic seems surprisingly solid for a first pass. You can merge this in the bot and do the full run. I may discover logic tweaks when I really have time to sit down and look at things in more details, but I see nothing obviously wrong. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:42, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
What would be nice for this run would be to get the link formatting. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:34, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
I haven't had a chance to do the merge yet so I manually saved the remaining output. When I do the merge, I should be able to apply the formatting w/o much trouble. -- JLaTondre (talk) 01:59, 14 July 2017 (UTC)